Discordant results obtained for different methods of HER-2/neu testing in breast cancer--a question of standardization, automation and timing

BACKGROUND: HER-2/neu positivity is required for the selection of stage IV breast cancer patients for trastuzumab therapy. We compared the results of the recommended immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation with the automated ACIS IHC system and with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These HER-2/neu tissue results were correlated with the serum HER-2/neu (sHER-2/neu) levels at the time of metastatic spread. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 61 IHC slides from 30 patients were stained using the HercepTest. HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined using the Ventana FISH assay. sHER-2/neu levels were measured with the Oncogene Science" ELISA kit. The concordance of HER-2/neu results was determined using the concordance index Kappa (kappa). RESULTS: The best concordance between any IHC and FISH was found for the automated ACIS system (88.5%, kappa=0.68, category "good"). The comparison between the manual interpretations and the automated IHC was categorized as "very good" (95.1%, kappa=0.85). The median sHER-2/neu level of FISH positive patients was significantly higher (67 ng/mL) than that of FISH negative patients (17 ng/mL, p=0.018). The increase in HER-2/neu positivity comparing tissue to stage IV serum was statistically significant (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance between conventional IHC and computerized analysis was very good. The number of patients with stage IV breast cancer with an elevated sHER-2/neu level was much higher than HER-2/neu positivity in tissue. This discrepancy is only partially explained by the influence of tumor load. Patients with an elevated sHER-2/neu level and no tissue overexpression should be considered for retesting of tissue or a new biopsy.     

An international proficiency study with the tumor marker CA 125

A strict and adequate quality assurance program is the only real guarantee of the reliability of laboratory test results. Such proficiency testing was carried out for the CA 125 test system in five university laboratories over a period of three years (1984-1987) using five different reference materials (BIOREF, FRG). A concentration-dependent performance profile could thus be established evaluating a total of 301 assays. Intra-assay precision of the test ranged between 4.8 and 11.5%, and interassay precision between 13.6 and 19.1%. Laboratory specific average values of the individual reference materials ranged between 26 and 32 U/ml for reference 1, 51 and 59 U/ml for reference 2, 109 and 121 U/ml and 193 to 240 U/ml for references 3 and 4, respectively. Mean values for reference 5 ranged between 401 and 458 U/ml. There was no significant difference between mean values for the laboratories. Considerable batch-dependent variations of values became evident during the study but these were not indicated by the kit control supplied by the manufacturer. During the whole investigation period no systematic drift in values could be observed using trend analysis, indicating excellent stability of the reference material if stored frozen (-20 degrees C).