Effects of Simultaneous Deletion of pUL11 and Glycoprotein M on Virion Maturation of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1

The conserved membrane-associated tegument protein pUL11 and envelope glycoprotein M (gM) are involved in secondary envelopment of herpesvirus nucleocapsids in the cytoplasm. Although deletion of either gene had only moderate effects on replication of the related alphaherpesviruses herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and pseudorabies virus (PrV) in cell culture, simultaneous deletion of both genes resulted in a severe impairment in virion morphogenesis of PrV coinciding with the formation of huge inclusions in the cytoplasm containing nucleocapsids embedded in tegument (M. Kopp, H. Granzow, W. Fuchs, B. G. Klupp, and T. C. Mettenleiter, J. Virol. 78:3024-3034, 2004). To test whether a similar phenotype occurs in HSV-1, a gM and pUL11 double deletion mutant was generated based on a newly established bacterial artificial chromosome clone of HSV-1 strain KOS. Since gM-negative HSV-1 has not been thoroughly investigated ultrastructurally and different phenotypes have been ascribed to pUL11-negative HSV-1, single gene deletion mutants were also constructed and analyzed. On monkey kidney (Vero) cells, deletion of either pUL11 or gM resulted in ca.-fivefold-reduced titers and 40- to 50%-reduced plaque diameters compared to those of wild-type HSV-1 KOS, while on rabbit kidney (RK13) cells the defects were more pronounced, resulting in ca.-50-fold titer and 70% plaque size reduction for either mutant. Electron microscopy revealed that in the absence of either pUL11 or gM virion formation in the cytoplasm was inhibited, whereas nuclear stages were not visibly affected, which is in line with the phenotypes of corresponding PrV mutants. Simultaneous deletion of pUL11 and gM led to additive growth defects and, in RK13 cells, to the formation of large intracytoplasmic inclusions of capsids and tegument material, comparable to those in PrV-ΔUL11/gM-infected RK13 cells. The defects of HSV-1ΔUL11 and HSV-1ΔUL11/gM could be partially corrected in trans by pUL11 of PrV. Thus, our data indicate that PrV and HSV-1 pUL11 and gM exhibit similar functions in cytoplasmic steps of virion assembly.     

The Genetic Basis of Phenotypic Adaptation II: The Distribution of Adaptive Substitutions in the Moving Optimum Model

We consider a population that adapts to a gradually changing environment. Our aim is to describe how ecological and genetic factors combine to determine the genetic basis of adaptation. Specifically, we consider the evolution of a polygenic trait that is under stabilizing selection with a moving optimum. The ecological dynamics are defined by the strength of selection, , and the speed of the optimum, ; the key genetic parameters are the mutation rate Θ and the variance of the effects of new mutations, ω. We develop analytical approximations within an “adaptive-walk” framework and describe how selection acts as a sieve that transforms a given distribution of new mutations into the distribution of adaptive substitutions. Our analytical results are complemented by individual-based simulations. We find that (i) the ecological dynamics have a strong effect on the distribution of adaptive substitutions and their impact depends largely on a single composite measure , which combines the ecological and genetic parameters; (ii) depending on γ, we can distinguish two distinct adaptive regimes: for large γ the adaptive process is mutation limited and dominated by genetic constraints, whereas for small γ it is environmentally limited and dominated by the external ecological dynamics; (iii) deviations from the adaptive-walk approximation occur for large mutation rates, when different mutant alleles interact via linkage or epistasis; and (iv) in contrast to predictions from previous models assuming constant selection, the distribution of adaptive substitutions is generally not exponential.AN important aim for both empirical and theoretical evolutionary biologists is to better understand the genetics of adaptation (e.g., Orr 2005a). For example, among the multitude of mutations that arise in a population, which ones are eventually fixed and contribute to evolutionary change? That is, given a distribution of new mutations, what is the distribution of adaptive substitutions (or fixed mutations)? Here, distribution means the probability distribution of the effects of mutations on either the phenotype or the fitness of their carriers. In principle, both the distribution of new mutations and the distribution of adaptive substitutions can be measured empirically, the former from mutation accumulation experiments (Eyre-Walker and Keightley 2007) and the latter from QTL (e.g., Bradshaw et al. 1998) or experimental evolution (Elena and Lenski 2003) studies. However, as only a small subset of all mutations is beneficial, such measurements are difficult. Therefore, a large role in studying the genetics of adaptation has to be played by theoretical modeling.In recent years, several different approaches have emerged for modeling the process of adaptation. Considerable work exists, in particular, in the context of Fisher''s geometric model (e.g., Fisher 1930; Kimura 1983; Orr 1998; Welch and Waxman 2005; Martin and Lenormand 2006), Gillespie''s mutational landscape model (e.g., Gillespie 1983, 1984; Orr 2002), various models of so-called “adaptive walks” on rugged fitness landscapes (e.g., Kauffman and Levin 1987; Kauffman 1993), and models of clonal interference in asexual populations (e.g., Gerrish and Lenski 1998; Park and Krug 2007). Together, these models have yielded several robust predictions. For example, both Fisher''s geometric model and the mutational landscape model predict that the distribution of adaptive substitutions should be approximately exponential (with respect to either phenotype or fitness) (Orr 1998, 2002, 2005a,b). This means that most substitutions have little effect, but that a significant fraction of the overall evolutionary change is due to a small number of substitutions with large effects. These results are in qualitative agreement with empirical data (Orr 2005a; Elena and Lenski 2003) and have shed new light on the classical debate about micro- vs. macromutationalism (Fisher 1930; Provine 2001).One way to look at adaptation is to view selection as a sieve that transforms the distribution of new mutations into the distribution of adaptive substitutions (Turner 1981; Orr and Betancourt 2001). This perspective emphasizes the role of environmental factors and directly leads to the question of how different selective regimes (sieves) affect the adaptive process. Yet, almost all studies to date have focused on the simplest possible ecological scenario: a population that, after a sudden change in the environment, is now under constant stabilizing selection.In reality, however, environmental change is often gradual rather than sudden (e.g., Hairston et al. 2005; Thompson 2005; Parmesan 2006; Perron et al. 2008). To account for this possibility, several authors (Bello and Waxman 2006; Collins et al. 2007; Kopp and Hermisson 2007; Sato and Waxman 2008; Kopp and Hermisson 2009) have recently turned to the so-called moving optimum model, which was originally devised in the field of quantitative genetics (e.g., Lynch et al. 1991; Lynch and Lande 1993; Bürger and Lynch 1995; Bürger 1999; Waxman and Peck 1999; Bürger and Gimelfarb 2002; Nunney 2003; Jones et al. 2004). In this model, the selectively favored value of a quantitative trait changes over time, such that the trait is under a mixture of stabilizing and directional selection. An important aspect of the moving optimum model is that it introduces an additional timescale (the timescale of environmental change), which is absent in the previous models.In a recent article (Kopp and Hermisson 2009) and a previous note (Kopp and Hermisson 2007), we have used the moving optimum model to investigate the time to fixation of a single mutation and the order in which mutations of different phenotypic effect go to fixation. However, the fastest mutations in the short term are not necessarily those that dominate evolution in the long term. The present article focuses on this long-term evolution, which can be characterized by the distribution of adaptive substitutions.     

Trophic ecology of the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in its introduced areas: a stable isotope approach in southwestern France

During the last decades, non-native predatory fish species have been largely introduced in European lakes and rivers, calling for detailed information on the trophic ecology of co-existing native and non-native predators. The present study describes the trophic ecology of the introduced pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in two southwestern French rivers, using stable isotope analysis. Pikeperch could be categorized as a top-predator, and had a significantly higher trophic position (TP, mean±SE=4.2±0.1) compared to other predatory fish such as the native pike (Esox lucius, TP=3.7±0.1) and the introduced European catfish (Silurus glanis, TP=3.8±0.1). Most studies of resource use in freshwaters consider predatory fish as ecologically equivalent; however, this study showed that the pikeperch occupied a higher trophic niche compared to other predatory species in the Lot and Tarn rivers (Garonne River basin). This apparent specialization may thus have consequences upon interspecific relationships within the predatory guild and upon the functional organization of biological communities. To cite this article: D. Kopp et al., C. R. Biologies 332 (2009).     

Histopathological effects of cisplatin,doxorubicin and 5-flurouracil (5-FU) on the liver of male albino rats

Cisplatin, doxorubicin and fluorouracil (5-FU), drugs belonging to different chemical classes, have been extensively used for chemotherapy of various cancers. Despite extensive investigations into their hepatotoxicity, there is very limited information on their effects on the structure and ultra-structure of liver cells in vivo. Here, we demonstrate for the first time, the effects of these three anticancer drugs on rat liver toxicity using both light and electron microscopy. Light microscopic observations revealed that higher doses of cisplatin and doxorubicin caused massive hepatotoxicity compared to 5-FU treatment, including dissolution of hepatic cords, focal inflammation and necrotic tissues. Interestingly, low doses also exhibited abnormal changes, including periportal fibrosis, degeneration of hepatic cords and increased apoptosis. These changes were confirmed at ultrastructural level, including vesiculated rough endoplasmic reticulum and atrophied mitochondria with ill-differentiated cisternae, dense collection of macrophages and lymphocytes as well as fibrocytes with collagenous fibrils manifesting early sign of fibrosis, especially in response to cisplatin and doxorubicin -treatment. Our results provide in vivo evidence, at ultrastructural level, of direct hepatotoxicity caused by cisplatin, doxorubicin and 5-FU at both light and electron microscopi. These results can guide the design of appropriate treatment regimen to reduce the hepatotoxic effects of these anticancer drugs.     

The Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factor RasGRF1 promotes matrix metalloproteinase-3 production in rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue

Introduction  

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients share many similarities with transformed cancer cells, including spontaneous production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Altered or chronic activation of proto-oncogenic Ras family GTPases is thought to contribute to inflammation and joint destruction in RA, and abrogation of Ras family signaling is therapeutic in animal models of RA. Recently, expression and post-translational modification of Ras guanine nucleotide releasing factor 1 (RasGRF1) was found to contribute to spontaneous MMP production in melanoma cancer cells. Here, we examine the potential relationship between RasGRF1 expression and MMP production in RA, reactive arthritis, and inflammatory osteoarthritis synovial tissue and FLS.     

Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare?

Speciation with gene flow is greatly facilitated when traits subject to divergent selection also contribute to non-random mating. Such traits have been called 'magic traits', which could be interpreted to imply that they are rare, special, or unrealistic. Here, we question this assumption by illustrating that magic traits can be produced by a variety of mechanisms, including ones in which reproductive isolation arises as an automatic by-product of adaptive divergence. We also draw upon the theoretical literature to explore whether magic traits have a unique role in speciation or can be mimicked in their effects by physically linked trait-complexes. We conclude that magic traits are more frequent than previously perceived, but further work is needed to clarify their importance.     

Interaction of calmodulin with Sec61α limits Ca2+ leakage from the endoplasmic reticulum

In eukaryotes, protein transport into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is facilitated by a protein-conducting channel, the Sec61 complex. The presence of large, water-filled pores with uncontrolled ion permeability, as formed by Sec61 complexes in the ER membrane, would seriously interfere with the regulated release of calcium from the ER lumen into the cytosol, an essential mechanism for intracellular signalling. We identified a calmodulin (CaM)-binding motif in the cytosolic N-terminus of mammalian Sec61α that bound CaM but not Ca2+-free apocalmodulin with nanomolar affinity and sequence specificity. In single-channel measurements, CaM potently mediated Sec61-channel closure in Ca2+-dependent manner. At the cellular level, two different CaM antagonists stimulated calcium release from the ER through Sec61 channels. However, protein transport into microsomes was not modulated by Ca2+-CaM. Molecular modelling of the ribosome/Sec61/CaM complexes supports the view that simultaneous ribosome and CaM binding to the Sec61 complex may be possible. Overall, CaM is involved in limiting Ca2+ leakage from the ER.     

Molecular basis for the unique role of the AAA+ chaperone ClpV in type VI protein secretion

Ring-forming AAA(+) ATPases act in a plethora of cellular processes by remodeling macromolecules. The specificity of individual AAA(+) proteins is achieved by direct or adaptor-mediated association with substrates via distinct recognition domains. We investigated the molecular basis of substrate interaction for Vibrio cholerae ClpV, which disassembles tubular VipA/VipB complexes, an essential step of type VI protein secretion and bacterial virulence. We identified the ClpV recognition site within VipB, showed that productive ClpV-VipB interaction requires the oligomeric state of both proteins, solved the crystal structure of a ClpV N-domain-VipB peptide complex, and verified the interaction surface by mutant analysis. Our results show that the substrate is bound to a hydrophobic groove, which is formed by the addition of a single α-helix to the core N-domain. This helix is absent from homologous N-domains, explaining the unique substrate specificity of ClpV. A limited interaction surface between both proteins accounts for the dramatic increase in binding affinity upon ATP-driven ClpV hexamerization and VipA/VipB tubule assembly by coupling multiple weak interactions. This principle ensures ClpV selectivity toward the VipA/VipB macromolecular complex.