Generalizable brain network markers of major depressive disorder across multiple imaging sites

Many studies have highlighted the difficulty inherent to the clinical application of fundamental neuroscience knowledge based on machine learning techniques. It is difficult to generalize machine learning brain markers to the data acquired from independent imaging sites, mainly due to large site differences in functional magnetic resonance imaging. We address the difficulty of finding a generalizable marker of major depressive disorder (MDD) that would distinguish patients from healthy controls based on resting-state functional connectivity patterns. For the discovery dataset with 713 participants from 4 imaging sites, we removed site differences using our recently developed harmonization method and developed a machine learning MDD classifier. The classifier achieved an approximately 70% generalization accuracy for an independent validation dataset with 521 participants from 5 different imaging sites. The successful generalization to a perfectly independent dataset acquired from multiple imaging sites is novel and ensures scientific reproducibility and clinical applicability.

Biomarkers for psychiatric disorders based on neuroimaging data have yet to be put to practical use. This study overcomes the problems of inter-site differences in fMRI data by using a novel harmonization method, thereby successfully constructing a generalizable brain network marker of major depressive disorder across multiple imaging sites.     

JDD1, a novel member of the DnaJ family, is expressed in the germinal zone of the rat brain.

We identified a novel gene encoding a new member of the DnaJ family, JDD1 (J domain of DnaJ-like-protein 1), from the rat. The cloned JDD1 cDNA is 1689 bp in size and its deduced amino acid sequence consists of 259 amino acid residues. Immunoblot analysis revealed that JDD1 protein is approximately 30 kDa in size. JDD1 has a J domain that is unique to the DnaJ family but lacks the G/F region (a region that is rich in the amino acids glycine and phenylalanine) and the zinc finger region (also known as the cysteine-rich region)-both characteristic to the DnaJ. JDD1 mRNA is expressed heterogeneously in vivo. In the central nervous system, JDD1 mRNA expression is confined to the germinal (ventricular and subventricular) zone where, except for cells situated deepest in the ventricular zone, neurons and glias are generated and then differentiate during the embryonic period. Expression of JDD1 mRNA in the subventricular zone persists after birth. In addition to the brain, its robust expression is notable in the liver, lung, cortex of the kidney, and several other tissues in the embryo.     

The amplitude of circadian oscillations: temperature dependence, latitudinal clines, and the photoperiodic time measurement.

This paper develops several propositions concerning the lability of the amplitude of Drosophila circadian pacemakers. The first is that the amplitude of the pacemaker's motion, unlike its period, is markedly temperature-dependent. The second is that latitudinal variation in pacemaker amplitude (higher in the north) is responsible for two very different sets of observations on Drosophila circadian systems at successively higher latitudes. One of these is a cline in D. auraria's phase-shifting response to light, which steadily weakens in a succession of more northerly strains. The other, concerning D. littoralis in the very far north, is a cline in the rate at which eclosion activity becomes arrhythmic (the circadian rhythm damps out) in constant darkness; damping is faster in the north. The third proposition concerns a plausible selection pressure for the cline in pacemaker amplitude that we propose underlies the two directly observed clines. Two points are emphasized: (1) The amplitude of the pacemaker's daily oscillation declines as the duration of the entraining light pulse (photoperiod) is increased; and (2) the duration of the daily photoperiods throughout the breeding season is steadily increased as one moves toward the poles. Selection for conservation of pacemaker amplitude (during the breeding season) would produce the latitudinal cline we propose. The fourth, and final proposition is that since the amplitude of the pacemaker's daily motion responds systematically to change in photoperiod, amplitude is clearly one way--and a temperature-dependent way--in which insect circadian systems may sense seasonal change. These propositions concerning the temperature and latitude dependence of pacemaker amplitude may be relevant to a wider array of circadian pacemakers than Drosophila.