The oncolytic peptide LTX-315 triggers necrotic cell death

The oncolytic peptide LTX-315 has been designed for killing human cancer cells and turned out to stimulate anti-cancer immune responses when locally injected into tumors established in immunocompetent mice. Here, we investigated the question whether LTX-315 induces apoptosis or necrosis. Transmission electron microscopy or morphometric analysis of chromatin-stained tumor cells revealed that LTX-315 failed to induce apoptotic nuclear condensation and rather induced a necrotic phenotype. Accordingly, LTX-315 failed to stimulate the activation of caspase-3, and inhibition of caspases by means of Z-VAD-fmk was unable to reduce cell killing by LTX-315. In addition, 2 prominent inhibitors of regulated necrosis (necroptosis), namely, necrostatin-1 and cycosporin A, failed to reduce LTX-315-induced cell death. In conclusion, it appears that LTX-315 triggers unregulated necrosis, which may contribute to its pro-inflammatory and pro-immune effects.     

Shell form,behaviour, and tolerance to water movement in the limpet Patina pellucida (L.) (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia)

The diotocardian gastropod Patina pellucida (L.) is a macro-herbivore common upon the fronds of laminarian algae. Considerations of shell shape, adhesive tenacity, and current tolerance, together with calculations of expected hydrodynamic drag, indicate that this limpet is effectively streamlined. Smaller individuals are relatively more resistant to dislodgement than are larger ones. Experimental animals of 6.0–13.5 mm shell length resisted constant flows of up to 0.9-1.3 m s^?1. An orientation, in which the longitudinal axis of a limpet is aligned parallel to the direction of the prevailing flow, is induced by currents faster than ≈ 0.5 m s^?1, and is an adaptation to conditions of directional water streaming. P. pellucida appears to show a seasonal change in orientatory preference, individuals tending to point distally with respect to the algal lamina in spring and proximally in autumn: this change may be associated with the annual growth cycle of the host plant.     

Comparison of different methods of determining cell viability after exposure to cytotoxic compounds

Cell-survival (of DON and L1210 cells) after treatment with cytotoxic compounds was assessed by measuring cloning efficiency, exclusion of trypan blue and erythrosin B, [⁵¹Cr] release, and attachment of DON cells to glass. Cell survival as measured by cloning efficiency did not correlate with survival measured by any of the other methods. We found that the stainability of cells after drug exposure depended on the cell line used. For example, after 3 h exposure to tubercidin although 100% of both DON and L1210 cells were killed (on basis of cloning efficiency), only 11% of DON cells and 68% of L1210 cells were dead as indicated by staining with erythrosin B. The stainability of cells also depended on the particular drug used. For example, after 24 h exposure of L1210 cells to adriamycin and tubercidin (both killed >99% of cells on basis of cloning efficiency) 21% of cells exposed to adriamycin and 99% of cells exposed to tubercidin were stained. The results obtained with several other cytotoxic compounds are discussed.     

... and goodbye for now!

I have been the Executive Editor of the Journal of PlanktonResearch (JPR) for three years (even if it feels like longer)but from January 2008 the baton is passed over to Roger Harris. My association with JPR started in earnest in the early 1990's;I was doing so much reviewing for the Journal that David Cushing,the then Editor (and, of     

Small hosts infrequently disrupt laying by Brown-headed Cowbirds and Bronzed Cowbirds

ABSTRACT Brood parasites often must overcome host defenses that may include behaviors that serve other functions, such as deterrence of predators and nest attendance during laying and incubation. Host use by brood parasites may also be influenced by competitors in areas where more than one parasitic species occurs. We identified the degree to which behavior of potential hosts and potential competitors affected laying by Brown‐headed Cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and Bronzed Cowbirds (M. aeneus) at a site in south Texas where they co‐occur. We watched potential host nests during the presunrise period to record cowbird laying and document nest visitation, laying, cowbird‐host encounters, and nest attentiveness by hosts. Hosts were frequently at their nests when cowbirds laid eggs (83% of 121 watches among nests of five host species) and cowbirds regularly encountered hosts (43–74% and 40–77% of watches per species of host for Brown‐headed and Bronzed cowbirds, respectively). Host nest defense infrequently interfered with cowbird laying and cowbirds rarely interacted with one another during laying. Overall, 12% of the 42 cowbird laying attempts that elicited host nest defense failed, resulting in cowbird eggs either laid atop hosts as they sat in nests or laid outside the nest cup. We clearly documented that relatively small hosts can thwart parasitism by cowbirds. Thus, the potential for successful defense of nests should be considered when assessing the evolution of behaviors to deter the removal of host eggs by cowbirds and mechanisms leading to nest abandonment. Regarding the latter, the presence of a cowbird at a nest would be a poor indicator for parasitism as some laying attempts were thwarted and unparasitized broods were reared at those nests. Despite the potential for nest defense to affect host use by cowbirds, we did not detect an effect of nest defense. Because most host defense was ineffective, we examined hypotheses for the timing of cowbird laying and host nest attendance. Our analysis of time of day of laying by Brown‐headed Cowbirds at our site and data compiled from the literature suggests that laying time is best predicted by the time of civil twilight (first light) rather than sunrise.