Inter-Tributary Movements by Resident Salmonids across a Boreal Riverscape

Stream-dwelling fishes inhabit river networks where resources are distributed heterogeneously across space and time. Current theory emphasizes that fishes often perform large-scale movements among habitat patches for reproduction and seeking refugia, but assumes that fish are relatively sedentary during growth phases of their life cycle. Using stationary passive integrated transponder (PIT)-tag antennas and snorkel surveys, we assessed the individual and population level movement patterns of two species of fish across a network of tributaries within the Wood River basin in southwestern Alaska where summer foraging opportunities vary substantially among streams, seasons, and years. Across two years, Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exhibited kilometer-scale movements among streams during the summer growing season. Although we monitored movements at a small fraction of all tributaries used by grayling and rainbow trout, approximately 50% of individuals moved among two or more streams separated by at least 7 km within a single summer. Movements were concentrated in June and July, and subsided by early August. The decline in movements coincided with spawning by anadromous sockeye salmon, which offer a high-quality resource pulse of food to resident species. Inter-stream movements may represent prospecting behavior as individuals seek out the most profitable foraging opportunities that are patchily distributed across space and time. Our results highlight that large-scale movements may not only be necessary for individuals to fulfill their life-cycle, but also to exploit heterogeneously spaced trophic resources. Therefore, habitat fragmentation and homogenization may have strong, but currently undescribed, ecological effects on the access to critical food resources in stream-dwelling fish populations.     

Development and evaluation of high‐density Axiom®CicerSNP Array for high‐resolution genetic mapping and breeding applications in chickpea

To accelerate genomics research and molecular breeding applications in chickpea, a high‐throughput SNP genotyping platform ‘Axiom^®CicerSNP Array’ has been designed, developed and validated. Screening of whole‐genome resequencing data from 429 chickpea lines identified 4.9 million SNPs, from which a subset of 70 463 high‐quality nonredundant SNPs was selected using different stringent filter criteria. This was further narrowed down to 61 174 SNPs based on p‐convert score ≥0.3, of which 50 590 SNPs could be tiled on array. Among these tiled SNPs, a total of 11 245 SNPs (22.23%) were from the coding regions of 3673 different genes. The developed Axiom^®CicerSNP Array was used for genotyping two recombinant inbred line populations, namely ICCRIL03 (ICC 4958 × ICC 1882) and ICCRIL04 (ICC 283 × ICC 8261). Genotyping data reflected high success and polymorphic rate, with 15 140 (29.93%; ICCRIL03) and 20 018 (39.57%; ICCRIL04) polymorphic SNPs. High‐density genetic maps comprising 13 679 SNPs spanning 1033.67 cM and 7769 SNPs spanning 1076.35 cM were developed for ICCRIL03 and ICCRIL04 populations, respectively. QTL analysis using multilocation, multiseason phenotyping data on these RILs identified 70 (ICCRIL03) and 120 (ICCRIL04) main‐effect QTLs on genetic map. Higher precision and potential of this array is expected to advance chickpea genetics and breeding applications.     

Oomycete and fungal effector entry, a microbial Trojan horse

Oomycete and fungal symbionts have significant impacts on most commercially important crop and forest species, and on natural ecosystems, both negatively as pathogens and positively as mutualists. Symbiosis may be facilitated through the secretion of effector proteins, some of which modulate a variety of host defense mechanisms. A subset of these secreted proteins are able to translocate into host cells. In the oomycete pathogens, two conserved N-terminal motifs, RXLR and dEER, mediate translocation of effector proteins into host cells independent of any pathogen-encoded machinery. An expanded 'RXLR-like' motif [R/K/H]X[L/M/I/F/Y/W]X has been used to identify functional translocation motifs in host-cell-entering fungal effector proteins from pathogens and a mutualist. The RXLR-like translocation motifs were required for the fungal effectors to enter host cells in the absence of any pathogen-encoded machinery. Oomycete and fungal effectors with RXLR and RXLR-like motifs can bind phospholipids, specifically phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PtdIns-3-P). Effector-PtdIns-3-P binding appears to mediate cell entry via lipid raft-mediated endocytosis, and could be blocked by sequestering cell surface PtdIns-3-P or by utilizing inositides that competitively inhibit effector binding to PtdIns-3-P. These findings suggest that effector blocking technologies could be developed and utilized in a variety of important crop species against a broad spectrum of plant pathogens.     

Conserved C-terminal motifs required for avirulence and suppression of cell death by Phytophthora sojae effector Avr1b

The sequenced genomes of oomycete plant pathogens contain large superfamilies of effector proteins containing the protein translocation motif RXLR-dEER. However, the contributions of these effectors to pathogenicity remain poorly understood. Here, we show that the Phytophthora sojae effector protein Avr1b can contribute positively to virulence and can suppress programmed cell death (PCD) triggered by the mouse BAX protein in yeast, soybean (Glycine max), and Nicotiana benthamiana cells. We identify three conserved motifs (K, W, and Y) in the C terminus of the Avr1b protein and show that mutations in the conserved residues of the W and Y motifs reduce or abolish the ability of Avr1b to suppress PCD and also abolish the avirulence interaction of Avr1b with the Rps1b resistance gene in soybean. W and Y motifs are present in at least half of the identified oomycete RXLR-dEER effector candidates, and we show that three of these candidates also suppress PCD in soybean. Together, these results indicate that the W and Y motifs are critical for the interaction of Avr1b with host plant target proteins and support the hypothesis that these motifs are critical for the functions of the very large number of predicted oomycete effectors that contain them.     

Separation-of-function mutants reveal critical roles for RAG2 in both the cleavage and joining steps of V(D)J recombination

The only established physiological function of the V(D)J recombinase, comprising RAG1 and RAG2, is to perform DNA cleavage. The molecular roles of RAG2 in cleavage, the mechanisms used to join the broken DNA ends, and the identity of nuclease(s) that open the hairpin coding ends have been unknown. Site-directed mutagenesis targeting each conserved basic amino acid in RAG2 revealed several separation-of-function mutants that address these questions. Analysis of these mutants reveals that RAG2 helps recognize or cleave distorted DNA intermediates and plays an essential role in the joining step of V(D)J recombination. Moreover, the discovery that some mutants block RAG-mediated hairpin opening in vitro provides a critical link between this biochemical activity and coding joint formation in vivo.     

Conditional RAG-1 mutants block the hairpin formation step of V(D)J recombination

Hairpin formation serves an important regulatory role in V(D)J recombination because it requires synapsis of an appropriate pair of recombination sites. How hairpin formation is regulated and which regions of the RAG proteins perform this step remain unknown. We analyzed two conditional RAG-1 mutants that affect residues quite close in the primary sequence to an active site amino acid (D600), and we found that they exhibit severely impaired recombination in the presence of certain cleavage site sequences. These mutants are specifically defective for the formation of hairpins, providing the first identification of a region of the V(D)J recombinase necessary for this reaction. Substrates containing mismatched bases at the cleavage site rescued hairpin formation by both mutants, which suggests that the mutations affect the generation of a distorted or unwound DNA intermediate that has been implicated in hairpin formation. Our results also indicate that this region of RAG-1 may be important for coupling hairpin formation to synapsis.     

A Simple Preparative Method for the Isolation of Amylose and Amylopectin from Potato Starch

The defatted starch was dispersed in NaOH (1 M) and neutralized with HCl (1 M). The amylose 1-butanol complex is adsorbed on defatted cellulose powder in the solvent system containing acetate buffer (pH 4.8, 0.1 M) ± urea (2 M) ± 1-butanol (8.5 %, v/v). The complex adsorbed on cellulose powder is separated by centrifugation (2418 g). The sediment is washed with the solvent system-I to obtain the intermediate fraction. The adsorbed amylose is eluted with urea (2 M) in acetate buffer (pH 4.8, 0.1 M). The amylose, intermediate fraction and amylopectin were precipitated with ethanol, washed free of urea and air dried. They were characterized by determining their blue value and β -amylolysis limit.     

Mechanisms of Action of Bcl-2 Family Proteins

The Bcl-2 family of proteins controls a critical step in commitment to apoptosis by regulating permeabilization of the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM). The family is divided into three classes: multiregion proapoptotic proteins that directly permeabilize the MOM; BH3 proteins that directly or indirectly activate the pore-forming class members; and the antiapoptotic proteins that inhibit this process at several steps. Different experimental approaches have led to several models, each proposed to explain the interactions between Bcl-2 family proteins. The discovery that many of these interactions occur at or in membranes as well as in the cytoplasm, and are governed by the concentrations and relative binding affinities of the proteins, provides a new basis for rationalizing these models. Furthermore, these dynamic interactions cause conformational changes in the Bcl-2 proteins that modulate their apoptotic function, providing additional potential modes of regulation.Apoptosis was formally described and named in 1972 as a unique morphological response to many different kinds of cell stress that was distinct from necrosis. However, despite the novelty and utility of the concept, little experimental work was performed during the following 20 years because no tools existed to manipulate the process. In the early 1990s, two seminal observations changed the landscape. First, as the complete developmental sequence of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans was painstakingly elucidated at the single-cell level, it was noted that a fixed, predictable number of “intermediate” cells were destined to die, and that this process was positively and negatively regulated by specific genes. Second, a novel gene called B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2; encoded by BCL2) that was discovered as a partner in a reciprocal chromosomal translocation in a human tumor turned out to function not as a classic oncogene by driving cell division, but rather by preventing apoptosis. When it was discovered that the mammalian BCL2 could substitute for CED-9, the C. elegans gene that inhibits cell death, the generality of the process was recognized, and the scientific literature exploded with now well over 10⁵ publications on apoptosis. However, it is ironic to note that after a further 20 years of intensive investigation, it is clear that the mechanism of action of Bcl-2 is quite distinct from Ced-9, which sequesters the activator of the caspase protease that is the ultimate effector of apoptosis. In contrast, Bcl-2 works primarily by binding to other related proteins that regulate permeabilization of the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM).This review examines how apoptosis is regulated by the members of the (now very large) Bcl-2 family, composed of three groups related by structure and function (illustrated in Fig. 1): (1) the BH3 proteins that sense cellular stress and activate (either directly or indirectly); (2) the executioner proteins Bax or Bak that oligomerize in and permeabilize the MOM, thereby releasing components of the intermembrane space that activate the final, effector caspases of apoptosis; and (3) the antiapoptotic members like Bcl-2 that impede the overall process by inhibiting both the BH3 and the executioner proteins. To understand the consequence of the interactions among the three subgroups, several models have been proposed (“direct activation,” “displacement,” “embedded together,” and “unified” models; illustrated in Fig. 2) that are briefly described here before a more detailed discussion of the Bcl-2 families.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Schematic overview of the Bcl-2 family of proteins. The family is divided into two subgroups containing proteins that either inhibit apoptosis or promote apoptosis. The proapoptotic proteins are further subdivided functionally into those that oligomerize and permeabilize the MOM, such as Bax and Bak, or those that promote apoptosis through either activating Bax or Bak or inhibiting the antiapoptotic proteins, such as tBid, Bim, Bad, and Noxa. Proteins are included in the Bcl-2 family based on sequence homology to the founding member, Bcl-2, in one of the four Bcl-2 homology (BH) regions. All the antiapoptotic proteins, as well as Bax, Bak, and Bid, have multiple BH regions, are evolutionarily related, and share a three-dimensional (3D) structural fold. The BH3 proteins contain only the BH3 region, are evolutionarily distant from the multiregion proteins, and are intrinsically unstructured. Most members of the Bcl-2 family proteins contain a membrane-binding region (MBR) on their carboxyl termini in the form of a tail anchor, mitochondrial-targeting sequence, or as a hydrophobic amino acid sequence that facilitates binding and localization of these proteins to the MOM or to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.Schematics of the core mechanisms proposed by various models for the regulation of MOMP by Bcl-2 proteins. (↑) Activation; (⊥) inhibition; (⊥↑) mutual recruitment/sequestration. Paired forward and reverse symbols indicate the model makes explicit reference to equilibria. (A) The direct activation model divides the different BH3 proteins by qualitative differences in function. The BH3 proteins with high affinity for binding and activating Bax and Bak are termed as “activators,” whereas those that only bind the antiapoptotic proteins are termed “sensitizers.” The activator BH3 proteins directly interact with and activate Bax and Bak to promote MOMP. The antiapoptotic proteins inhibit MOMP by specifically sequestering the BH3 activators. The BH3 sensitizer proteins can compete for binding with the antiapoptotic proteins, thus releasing the BH3 activator proteins to avidly promote MOMP through activation and oligomerization of Bax and Bak. (B) The displacement model categorizes the BH3 proteins solely based on their affinities of binding for the antiapoptotic proteins (hence, does not recognize them as activators). In this model, Bax and Bak are constitutively active and oligomerize and induce MOMP unless held in check by the antiapoptotic proteins. Therefore, for a cell to undergo apoptosis, the correct combination of BH3 proteins must compete for binding for the different antiapoptotic proteins to liberate Bax and Bak and for MOMP to ensue. (C) The embedded together model introduces an active role for the membrane and combines the major aspects of the previous models. The interactions between members of the Bcl-2 family are governed by equlibria and therefore are contingent on the relative protein concentrations as well as their binding affinities. The latter are determined by posttranslational modifications, fraction of protein bound to the membrane, and cellular physiology. At membranes, the activator BH3 proteins directly activate Bax and Bak, which then oligomerize, inducing MOMP. Both activator and sensitizer BH3 proteins can recruit and sequester antiapoptotic proteins in the membrane. The antiapoptotic proteins inhibit apoptosis by sequestering the BH3 proteins and Bax and Bak in the membrane or by preventing their binding to membranes. At different intracellular membranes, the local concentrations of specific subsets of Bcl-2 family members alter the binding of Bcl-2 proteins to the membrane and the binding equilibria between family members. As a result, Bcl-2 family proteins have distinct but overlapping functions at different cellular locations. (D) The unified model builds on the embedded together model by proposing that the antiapoptotic proteins sequester the activator BH3 proteins (mode 1) and sequester Bax and Bak (mode 2). It differs in that in the unified model, inhibition of apoptosis through mode 1 is less efficient (smaller arrow in panel D) and therefore easier to overcome by sensitizer BH3 proteins. In addition, the unified model extends the role of Bcl-2 family proteins and the regulation of MOMP to mitochondria dynamics (not shown).