A non-invasive micronucleus assay in the rat liver

The potent rat-liver mitogen 4-acetylaminofluorene (4AAF) is shown here to provide an effective replacement for the surgical procedure of 2/3 partial hepatectomy (2/3PH) in the in vivo rat-liver micronucleus assay described by Tates and his colleagues. This protocol modification enables the assay to be conducted on a routine basis. Control observations for both 2/3PH and 4AAF-treated rats are presented, together with evidence indicating 4AAF itself to be without activity in the assay, irrespective of the mitogenic stimulus. The activities of the rat carcinogens DMN, 2AAF, DMH and 6BT, and of the non-carcinogens 4AAF and 4N are demonstrated. Recommendations for the conduct of the modified assay are made.     

Response of three lotic assemblages to riparian and catchment‐scale land use: implications for designing catchment monitoring programmes

1. Although many studies have focussed on the effects of catchment land use on lotic systems, the importance of broad (catchment) and fine (segment/reach) scale effects on stream assemblages remain poorly understood. 2. Nine biological metrics for macrophytes (498 sites), benthic macroinvertebrates (491) and fish (478) of lowland and mountain streams in four ecoregions of France and Germany were related to catchment and riparian buffer land use using partial Redundancy Analysis and Boosted Regression Trees (BRTs). 3. Lotic fauna was better correlated (mean max., r = 0.450) than flora (r = 0.277) to both scales of land use: the strongest correlations were noted for mountain streams. BRTs revealed strong non‐linear relationships between mountain assemblage metrics and land use. Correlations increased with increasing buffer lengths, suggesting the importance of near‐stream land use on biotic assemblages. 4. Several metrics changed markedly between 10–20% (mountain ecoregions) and 40–45% (lowland) of arable land use, irrespective of the buffer size. At mountain sites with >10% catchment arable land use, metric values differed between sites with <30% and sites with >30% forest in the near‐stream riparian area. 5. These findings support the role of riparian land use in catchment management; however, differences between mountain and lowland ecoregions support the need for ecoregion‐specific management.