Structural basis of blocking integrin activation and deactivation for anti-inflammation

Integrins mediate leukocyte accumulation to the sites of inflammation, thereby enhancing their potential as an important therapeutic target for inflammatory disorders. Integrin activation triggered by inflammatory mediators or signaling pathway is a key step to initiate leukocyte migration to inflamed tissues; however, an appropriately regulated integrin deactivation is indispensable for maintaining productive leukocyte migration. While typical integrin antagonists that block integrin activation target the initiation of leukocyte migration, a novel class of experimental compounds has been designed to block integrin deactivation, thereby perturbing the progression of cell migration. Current review discusses the mechanisms by which integrin is activated and subsequently deactivated by focusing on its structure-function relationship.     

USP11-dependent selective cIAP2 deubiquitylation and stabilization determine sensitivity to Smac mimetics

Given their crucial role in apoptosis suppression, inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) have recently become attractive targets for cancer therapy. Here, we report that cellular IAP2 (cIAP2) is specifically stabilized in several cancer cell lines, leading to resistance to Smac mimetics, such as BV6 and birinapant. In particular, our results showed that cIAP2 depletion, but not cIAP1 depletion, sensitized cancer cells to Smac mimetic-induced apoptosis. Ubiquitin-specific protease 11 (USP11) is a deubiquitylase that directly stabilizes cIAP2. USP11 overexpression is frequently found in colorectal cancer and melanoma and is correlated with poor survival. In our study, cancer cell lines expressing high levels of USP11 exhibited strong resistance to Smac mimetic-induced cIAP2 degradation. Furthermore, USP11 downregulation sensitized these cells to apoptosis induced by TRAIL and BV6 and suppressed tumor growth in a xenograft model. Finally, the TNFα/JNK pathway induced USP11 expression and maintained cIAP2 stability, suggesting an alternative TNFα-dependent cell survival pathway. Collectively, our data suggest that USP11-stabilized cIAP2 may serve as a barrier against IAP-targeted clinical approaches.Apoptosis is an inherent cell death program that is crucial for various physiological processes such as development, the immune response, and tumorigenesis.¹ This process is finely tuned by numerous cellular signaling pathways involving hundreds of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic factors.^{2, 3} Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) are a conserved protein family containing the baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domain.⁴ There are eight human IAP proteins, including cellular IAP1 (cIAP1/BIRC2), cIAP2/BIRC3, X chromosome-linked IAP (XIAP/BIRC4), and melanoma IAP (ML-IAP/BIRC7).⁵ IAPs such as XIAP can exert their anti-apoptotic function through the BIR domain, which directly interacts with caspases.⁵ In addition, several IAPs contain a RING domain with E3 ubiquitin ligase activities, which are crucial for apoptosis suppression. In particular, the E3 ligase activities of cIAP1/2 are necessary to regulate tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) signaling.⁶ Upon TNFR activation, cIAP1/2 is recruited to TNFR through TNFα receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2), leading to K63-linked polyubiquitylation of receptor interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), which is essential for NF-κB-mediated cell survival.⁷ The lack of RIPK1 polyubiquitylation via cIAP1/2 depletion or the presence of CYLD deubiquitylase triggers TNFR complex IIa formation, thereby inducing caspase-8-dependent apoptosis.⁸ In addition, cIAP1/2 prevents the formation of the RIPK1-containing death complex ripoptosome in response to several stimuli including CD95, TNFα-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), genotoxic stress, and Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation.^{9, 10, 11, 12, 13}IAPs are frequently overexpressed in various human cancers, and their expression is associated with chemoresistance and poor clinical outcome.⁶ Therefore, inhibiting IAP function is an attractive strategy to treat cancer through the induction of apoptosis.^{5, 14} Upon apoptotic stimuli, IAPs are inhibited by the second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac),⁵ and this discovery led to the development of Smac mimetic peptides using the IAP binding motif containing four amino acids (Ala-Val-Pro-Ile). These peptides were shown to sensitize cells to apoptotic stimuli and efficiently suppress tumor growth in a xenograft model.^{15, 16} Subsequently, a number of small-molecule compounds mimicking the Smac mimetic peptide (Smac mimetics) were developed with improved pharmacological properties and IAP-binding affinity. Interestingly, Smac mimetics, such as BV6 and compound A, were found to induce autoubiquitylation and degradation of cIAP1/2.^{17, 18} Furthermore, cIAP1/2 depletion with Smac mimetics activates the non-canonical NF-κB pathway to induce autocrine TNFα production, which is essential for Smac mimetic-induced apoptotic cell death.^{18, 19}Because cIAP1 and cIAP2 show functional redundancy in TNFα-mediated survival, the depletion of both proteins is usually required for effective induction of cell death upon TNFα treatment.^{20, 21} However, there are several reports showing that cIAP2 expression, but not cIAP1 expression, renders cells resistant to Smac mimetic-induced cell death.^{20, 21} For example, cIAP2 upregulation via phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) upon compound 3 treatment in certain cell lines was shown to facilitate apoptosis evasion.²² In addition, treatment with compounds A and C led to cIAP1 dimerization, without cIAP2 dimerization, resulting in the autoubiquitylation and subsequent degradation of cIAP1. These findings may explain why cIAP1 is degraded more efficiently than cIAP2 upon treatment with Smac mimetics.²³ Alternatively, because cIAP2 degradation requires cIAP1, cIAP2 may become more stable when cIAP1 is depleted using Smac mimetics.²⁴ Direct cIAP deubiquitylation by OTUB1 or USP19 has been suggested to be responsible for cIAP stabilization;^{25, 26} however, these previous studies did not focus on the difference in stabilization between cIAP1 and cIAP2 and only provided general deubiquitylation-dependent mechanisms.^{25, 26}While several studies have supported hypotheses for how cIAP2 survives in the presence of Smac mimetics, numerous independent studies have also shown that cIAP2 can be efficiently degraded by Smac mimetics in various cell lines.^{27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32} These observations suggest the existence of other factors that specifically regulate cIAP2 stability upon Smac mimetic treatment. In this study, we propose a new mechanism involving USP11-mediated cIAP2 regulation. We found that the differential destabilization of cIAP1 and cIAP2 is dependent on the presence of the cIAP2-specific deubiquitylase USP11. Mechanistically, USP11 can protect cIAP2 from Smac mimetic-mediated degradation, rendering cell lines with high USP11 expression unresponsive to Smac mimetic treatment. However, USP11 downregulation sensitized these cells to TNFα- or TRAIL-induced apoptosis in the presence of Smac mimetic and further suppressed tumor growth in a xenograft model. Corroborating these data, USP11 overexpression was observed in colon cancer and melanoma patients with poor clinical outcome. Finally, the TNFα/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway induced USP11 expression, which was necessary for cIAP2 protein stabilization and its anti-apoptotic function. Thus, the identification of cIAP2-specific deubiquitylation indicates that more elaborate strategies should be developed for pharmaceutical therapies targeting cIAPs.     

Preparation of cell-permeable Cre recombinase by expressed protein ligation

Background

Protein transduction is safer than viral vector-mediated transduction for the delivery of a therapeutic protein into a cell. Fusion proteins with an arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptide have been produced in E. coli, but the low solubility of the fusion protein expressed in E. coli impedes the large-scale production of fusion proteins from E. coli.

Results

Expressed protein ligation is a semisynthetic method to ligate a bacterially expressed protein with a chemically synthesized peptide. In this study, we developed expressed protein ligation-based techniques to conjugate synthetic polyarginine peptides to Cre recombinase. The conjugation efficiency of this technique was higher than 80%. Using this method, we prepared semisynthetic Cre with poly-L-arginine (ssCre-R9), poly-D-arginine (ssCre-dR9) and biotin (ssCre-dR9-biotin). We found that ssCre-R9 was delivered to the cell to a comparable level or more efficiently compared with Cre-R11 and TAT-Cre expressed as recombinant fusion proteins in E. coli. We also found that the poly-D-arginine cell-penetrating peptide was more effective than the poly-L-arginine cell-penetrating peptide for the delivery of Cre into cell. We visualized the cell transduced with ssCre-dR9-biotin using avidin-FITC.

Conclusions

Collectively, the results demonstrate that expressed protein ligation is an excellent technique for the production of cell-permeable Cre recombinase with polyarginine cell-penetrating peptides. In addition, this approach will extend the use of cell-permeable proteins to more sophisticated applications, such as cell imaging.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12896-015-0126-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Structural importance of the C-terminal region in pig aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C1 and their effects on enzymatic activity

Background

Pig aldo-keto reductase family 1 member C1 (AKR1C1) belongs to AKR superfamily which catalyzes the NAD(P)H-dependent reduction of various substrates including steroid hormones. Previously we have reported two paralogous pig AKR1C1s, wild-type AKR1C1 (C-type) and C-terminal-truncated AKR1C1 (T-type). Also, the C-terminal region significantly contributes to the NADPH-dependent reductase activity for 5α-DHT reduction. Molecular modeling studies combined with kinetic experiments were performed to investigate structural and enzymatic differences between wild-type AKR1C1 C-type and T-type.

Results

The results of the enzyme kinetics revealed that V _max and k _cat values of the T-type were 2.9 and 1.6 folds higher than those of the C-type. Moreover, catalytic efficiency was also 1.9 fold higher in T-type compared to C-type. Since x-ray crystal structures of pig AKR1C1 were not available, three dimensional structures of the both types of the protein were predicted using homology modeling methodology and they were used for molecular dynamics simulations. The structural comparisons between C-type and T-type showed that 5α-DHT formed strong hydrogen bonds with catalytic residues such as Tyr55 and His117 in T-type. In particular, C3 ketone group of the substrate was close to Tyr55 and NADPH in T-type.

Conclusions

Our results showed that 5α-DHT binding in T-type was more favorable for catalytic reaction to facilitate hydride transfer from the cofactor, and were consistent with experimental results. We believe that our study provides valuable information to understand important role of C-terminal region that affects enzymatic properties for 5α-DHT, and further molecular mechanism for the enzyme kinetics of AKR1C1 proteins.

     

Association of CXCL10 and CXCL13 levels with disease activity and cutaneous manifestation in active adult-onset Still’s disease

IntroductionC-X-C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10) is produced in response to interferon-γ, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) triggers the accumulation of activated lymphocytes. CXCL13 is constitutively expressed in secondary lymphoid tissues, and the expression is upregulated by TNF-α, via T cell stimulation. It appears that CXCL10 and CXCL13 could play a potential role in the pathogenesis of adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD), therefore, we investigated the associations between CXCL10 and CXCL13 levels and clinical manifestations in patients with active AOSD.MethodsBlood samples were collected from 39 active AOSD patients, 32 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and 40 healthy controls (HC). Of the AOSD patients, follow-up samples were collected from 15 9.6 ± 9.2 months later. Serum levels of CXCL10 and CXCL13 were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. CXCL10, CXCL13, and C-X-C chemokine receptor type 3 (CXCR3) expression levels in biopsy specimens obtained from 26 AOSD patients with skin rashes were investigated via immunohistochemistry.ResultsThe CXCL10 levels in AOSD patients (1,031.3 ± 2,019.6 pg/mL) were higher than in RA (146.3 ± 91.4 pg/mL, p = 0.008) and HC (104.4 ± 47.9 pg/mL, p = 0.006). Also, the CXCL13 levels of AOSD patients (158.8 ± 151.2 pg/mL) were higher than those of RA (54.4 ± 61.1 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and HC (23.5 ± 18.1 pg/mL, p < 0.001). Serum CXCL10 levels correlated with ferritin and systemic scores. Serum CXCL13 levels correlated with those of hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, ferritin, and albumin, and systemic scores. In follow-up AOSD patients, the levels of CXCL10 and CXCL13 fell significantly (153.7 ± 130.1 pg/mL, p = 0.002, and 89.1 ± 117.4 pg/mL, p = 0.001, respectively). On immunohistochemistry, the percentages of inflammatory cells expressing CXCL10 ranged from 1 to 85 %, CXCL13 from 1 to 72 %, and CXCR3 from 2 to 65 %. The percentage of CXCL10-positive inflammatory cells was higher in skin biopsy samples exhibiting mucin deposition than in those that did not (p = 0.01). CXCL13 levels were correlated with those of CD4 and CD68.ConclusionsSerum CXCL10 and CXCL13 levels may serve as clinical markers for assessment of disease activity in AOSD. CXCL10/CXCR3 and CXCL13 may contribute to the inflammatory response, especially skin manifestations thereof, in AOSD.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0773-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.