Novel methoxy-carotenoids from the burgundy-colored plumage of the Pompadour Cotinga Xipholena punicea

Recent advances in the fields of chromatography, mass spectrometry, and chemical analysis have greatly improved the efficiency with which carotenoids can be extracted and analyzed from avian plumage. Prior to these technological developments, Brush (1968) [1] concluded that the burgundy-colored plumage of the male pompadour Cotinga Xipholena punicea is produced by a combination of blue structural color and red carotenoids, including astaxanthin, canthaxanthin, isozeaxanthin, and a fourth unidentified, polar carotenoid. However, X. punicea does not in fact exhibit any structural coloration. This work aims to elucidate the carotenoid pigments of the burgundy color of X. punicea plumage using advanced analytical methodology. Feathers were collected from two burgundy male specimens and from a third aberrant orange-colored specimen. Pigments were extracted using a previously published technique (McGraw et al. (2005) [2]), separated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and analyzed by UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy, chemical analysis, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and comparison with direct synthetic products. Our investigation revealed the presence of eight ketocarotenoids, including astaxanthin and canthaxanthin as reported previously by Brush (1968) [1]. Six of the ketocarotenoids contained methoxyl groups, which is rare for naturally-occurring carotenoids and a novel finding in birds. Interestingly, the carotenoid composition was the same in both the burgundy and orange feathers, indicating that feather coloration in X. punicea is determined not only by the presence of carotenoids, but also by interactions between the bound carotenoid pigments and their protein environment in the barb rami and barbules. This paper presents the first evidence of metabolically-derived methoxy-carotenoids in birds.     

Determinants of growth-promoting activity reside in the A-domain of insulin-like growth factor I

A two-chain, disulfide linked, insulin-like compound embodying the A-domain of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and the B-chain of insulin has been synthesized and characterized with respect to insulin-like biological activity and growth-promoting potency. The compound displays a potency of ca. 41% relative to insulin in assays for insulin-like activity (e.g., lipogenesis) but significantly higher activity than insulin, ca. 730% relative to insulin, in growth factor assays (e.g., thymidine incorporation). The compound is, however, a less potent growth factor than IGF-I itself, ca. 26.5% relative to IGF-I, and is not recognized by IGF carrier proteins. We conclude that structural features contained in the A-domain of IGF-I are primarily responsible for the growth-promoting ability displayed by IGF-I, while features in the B-domain are responsible for recognition by IGF carrier proteins.     

Molecular and cellular aspects of nerve regeneration

Injury of an axon leads to at least four independent events, summarized in Figure 1: first, deprivation of the nerve cell body from target-derived or mediated substances, which leads to a derepressed or a permissive state; second, disruption of anterograde transport, with a resultant accumulation of anterogradely transported molecules; third, environmental response with possible consequent changes in constituents of the extracellular matrix and substances secreted from the surrounding cells; and fourth, appearance of growth inhibitors and modified protease activity. It seems that the first three of these events are obligatory, but not sufficient, i.e., they lead to a growth state only if the cell body is able to respond to the injury-induced signals from the environment (a and b). The regenerative state is characterized by alterations in protein synthesis and axonal transport and by sprouting activity. The subsequent elongation of the growing fibers depends on a continuous supply of appropriate growth factors. These factors are presumably anchored to the appropriate extracellular matrix that serves as a substratum for elongating fibers. It should be mentioned that the proliferating nonneuronal cells have a conducive effect on regeneration by forming a scaffold for the growing fibers. Accordingly, the lack of regeneration may stem from a deficiency in the ability of glial cells to provide the appropriate soluble components or from insufficient formation of extracellular matrix. In this respect, one may consider regeneration of an injured axon as a process which involves regeneration of both the nonneuronal cells and the supported axons. The regeneration of glial cells may fulfill the rules which are applied to regeneration of any other proliferating tissue. Furthermore, the processes of regeneration in the axon and the glial cells are mutually dependent. Perhaps the triggering factors provided by the nonneuronal cells affect the nonneuronal cells themselves by modulating their postlesion gliosis and thereby inducing their appropriate activation. In such a case, regeneration of nonneuronal cells may resemble an autocrine type of regulation that exists also during ontogeny. The growth regulation is shifted back to the paracrine type upon neuronal maturation or cessation of axonal growth. When the elongating fibers reach the vicinity of the target organ, they are under the influence of the target-derived factors, which guide the fibers and eventually cease their elongation.     

Differential effect of glucocorticoids on synthesis and secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)

Our previous work has suggested that glucocorticoid pretreatment suppresses the enhanced responsiveness to GnRH seen in serum LH 12 h after castration. By contrast, serum FSH continues to show the castration-induced hypersensitivity to GnRH. Our attempts to replicate this LH suppression in static pituitary culture in vitro were not successful. This suggested to us the possibility that corticoids in vivo might be preventing castration-induced increases in pituitary GnRH receptor levels. We tested this at 24 h post-castration and, in fact, corticoids did not suppress the increase in GnRH receptors. In addition to the aforementioned effects of corticoids, we have seen that cortisol reverses the castration-induced drop in pituitary FSH content. It does this for 7 days post-castration, even though it no longer has an effect in suppressing serum LH. Thus, our accumulated data reveal that glucocorticoids have a differential effect on LH and FSH synthesis and secretion. Further studies are needed to clarify the site(s) of action of glucocorticoids in gonadotropin secretion and synthesis. Glucocorticoids may well prove to be a key in unlocking the mystery of the mechanism of differential control of regulation of LH and FSH.