Rash Associated with Coxsackie A9 Infection

Coxsackie A9 virus was identified by the authors during the fall of 1965 in Montreal in six children with fever and exanthem. Three of the six children were siblings. The exanthem was centrally distributed as described by Lerner et al. and consisted of discrete maculopapules 3 to 4 mm. in diameter. The viral agent was recovered and identified in tissue culture in five cases, while in the sixth Coxsackie type-A lesions were produced in suckling mice. Serological confirmation was obtained in two patients from whom sera were available. In contrast, no exanthem was observed in three older patients with a diagnosis of aseptic meningitis associated with Coxsackie A9 virus. In only one of 16 patients with Coxsackie B virus infection was an exanthem observed during the same period.The true incidence of Coxsackie A9-associated exanthems is difficult to determine because of the benign nature of the disease.     

A study on the in vivo digestibility of retrograded starch

The digestibility of different forms of starch was examined in an ileostomy model. Six otherwise healthy ileostomists were fed a controlled polysaccharide-free diet for four days, on three of which a test starch was added at breakfast. 50 g starch was fed as either whole or homogenized chick peas or as a retrograded starch gel. A readily digestible wheat starch biscuit was used as a control. Ileostomy effluent was collected every 2 hours over a 16 hour period and a final collection made at 24 hours after the test meal. The monosaccharide composition and glycosyl linkages of the residual carbohydrate in the 2 hour peak period following the test meal was determined. Following consumption of the starch gel, poly- and oligo-saccharides from mucin and starch were identified in the effluent. At the peak of effluent production following the test meal, the average ratio of starch polysaccharide to mucin was 1:0.4. Of the 50 g of starch consumed, 7% of the starch escaped digestion in this fraction. Following consumption of cooked, cooled chick peas, which were fed whole or homogenized, polysaccharides deriving from starch, mucin and the cell wall were detected in the effluent. It was estimated from comparison of the composition of the food and effluent that 14% and 16% of the ingested starch in the form of homogenized and whole chick peas had escaped digestion in the small intestine. Linkage analysis showed the chemical structure of the starch escaping digestion after feeding the whole and homogenized chick peas was similar to that obtained after feeding the starch gel.     

Micropropagation of Cowania subintegra and Cowania stansburiana

Both Cowania subintegra Kearney and C. stansburiana Torr. were successfully propagated in vitro. Shoot proliferation occurred from shoot tips of green-house grown C. subintegra using a modified Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 4.4 M 6-benzyladenine and 0.5 M indole butyric acid. Excised microshoots (1.5–3.0 cm long) of both species were rooted using a two-step process in which they were cultured for 3 days in a root initiation medium with 2.7 M naphthaleneacetic acid and then transferred to a low nitrogen root elongation medium without auxin. Plantlets were successfully transferred to soilless potting mix.     

Rank relations among sisters in semi-free-ranging Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus)

Although semi-free-ranging Barbary macaque females are able to outrank older females from lower-ranking matrilines (matrilineal rank acquisition), they do not systematically outrank their older sisters, as is known to be the case for semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). We test the hypothesis that differences in the support received by younger sisters against their older sisters and against older lower-ranking females might account for this interspecific difference. Thirty-one sister dyads, members of a group of 109 Barbary macaques living at La Montagne des Singes, France, were observed during 16 months. The results indicate that (1) all females were dominant to their younger sisters, and the latter were never observed to challenge their older sisters; (2) younger sisters received as much kin support against their older sisters as against older lower-ranking females; (3) only very young females received support from their kin against their older sisters; (4) younger sisters received much more support from nonkin females against lower-ranking females than against their older sisters; and (5) Barbary macaque females appear to be supported against their older sisters less frequently than rhesus macaque females are. We conclude that the lack of nonkin support is the main factor accounting for the failure of younger sisters to outrank their older sisters in Barbary macaques. Initially this might result from kin support not being sufficient to induce younger sisters to challenge and to solicit support against their older sisters.