Replisome pausing in mutagenesis

E. coli cells containing a temperature-sensitivednaE mutation, in the α-subunit of holoenzyme DNA polymerase III, do not survive at the restrictive temperature. Such cells may survive in the presence of thepcbA1 mutation, an allele of thegyrB gene. Such survival is dependent on an active DNA polymerase I. Evidence indicates that DNA polymerase I interacts directly in the replisome (REP·A). Despite normal survival for cells using thepcbA replication pathway after some type of DNA damage, we have noted a failure of damage-induced mutagenesis. Here we present evidence supporting a model of replisome pausing in cells dependent upon thepcbA replication pathway. The model argues that the (REP·A) complex pauses longer at the site of the lesion, allowing excision repair to occur completely. In the normal replication pathway (REP·E) bypass of the lesion occurs, fixing the mutation.     

Kinetics of deactivation for thermostable DNA polymerase enzymes

Summary The kinetics of thermal deactivation for thermostable DNA polymerase enzymes were investigated by using the experimental data published elsewhere (Nielson et al. 1996. Strategies. 9, 7–8). The order of deactivation (a) and the deactivation rate constants (k _d) were determined for different Taq DNA polymerase enzymes and were found to be of first order.     

Phylogenetic comparative analysis of RNA structure on Macintosh computers

A Macintosh Hypertalk program (Hypercard ‘stack’)for use in phylogenetic comparative analysis of RNA structureis described. The program identifies covariations and compensatorychanges in RNA sequence alignments, for use in the constructionof secondary structure models or the identification of tertiaryinteractions. The results of an analysis are presented eitheras a list of positions in the alignment which covary, or asa 2-dimensional matrix in which potential helices in the secondarystructure appear as diagonal patterns. Received on January 7, 1991; accepted on March 19, 1991     

Convergence in foraging strategies by two morphologically and phylogenetically distinct nocturnal aerial insectivores

We used measurements of morphological parameters of common nighthawks ( Chordeiles minor ) and big brown bats ( Eptesicus fuscus )to derive predictions about foraging behaviour based on the animals foraging at the same site. We tested the predictions using data from direct observation, radio telemetry and diet analysis and found a high degree of convergence in behaviour by these two species.     

LEFKOVITCH'S ERROR

Abstract — Lefkovitch's formula for the probability of incompatibility between two binary characters can give incorrect results because it redundantly counts some possible compatibilities. The inaccuracy occurs when the characters have the same number of terminals showing the apomorphic state.     

Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of the rap-1A protein from its homology to theras-gene-encoded p21 protein

rap-1A, an anti-oncogene-encoded protein, is aras-p21-like protein whose sequence is over 80% homologous to p21 and which interacts with the same intracellular target proteins and is activated by the same mechanisms as p21, e.g., by binding GTP in place of GDP. Both interact with effector proteins in the same region, involving residues 32–47. However, activated rap-1A blocks the mitogenic signal transducing effects of p21. Optimal sequence alignment of p21 and rap-1A shows two insertions of rap-1A atras positions 120 and 138. We have constructed the three-dimensional structure of rap-1A bound to GTP by using the energy-minimized three-dimensional structure ofras-p21 as the basis for the modeling using a stepwise procedure in which identical and homologous amino acid residues in rap-1A are assumed to adopt the same conformation as the corresponding residues in p21. Side-chain conformations for homologous and nonhomologous residues are generated in conformations that are as close as possible to those of the corresponding side chains in p21. The entire structure has been subjected to a nested series of energy minimizations. The final predicted structure has an overall backbone deviation of 0.7 å from that ofras-p21. The effector binding domains from residues 32–47 are identical in both proteins (except for different side chains of different residues at position 45). A major difference occurs in the insertion region at residue 120. This region is in the middle of another effector loop of the p21 protein involving residues 115–126. Differences in sequence and structure in this region may contribute to the differences in cellular functions of these two proteins.