Decision analysis for the planning and assessment of ex situ management: An application to the endangered mahogany glider

Ex situ (‘off-site’) management refers to keeping species in artificial conditions away from their natural habitat and includes captive breeding facilities, botanical gardens and seed banks. There is scope for ex situ programmes to be more commonly used for supplementing or establishing wild populations. However, undertaking ex situ management comes with risks, costs and uncertainties, which must be assessed in the context of available in situ (‘on-site’) management options. The PACES (Planning and Assessment for Conservation through Ex situ management) tool tailors the principles of structured decision-making to the specific problem of assessing and comparing ex situ and in situ management options. We applied the PACES tool to the mahogany glider (Petaurus gracilis), a threatened arboreal marsupial endemic to north Queensland, Australia. Through an expert elicitation process, we predicted the likely benefits of an ex situ and two in situ management options, as compared to a baseline ‘do-nothing’ scenario. The ‘in situ plus’ alternative (where extra resources are dedicated to in situ management) was predicted to result in the largest population increase according to the participants' best estimates. However, this benefit came at a much larger cost than the ex situ alternative, and without the benefit of an ex situ insurance population. The PACES tool assessment allowed the Mahogany Glider Recovery Team to document and plan the financial costs, risks and benefits of potential future management options for the mahogany glider, laying a transparent basis for future assessment and decision-making.     

Detecting invertebrate ecosystem service providers in orchards: traditional methods versus barcoding of environmental DNA in soil

1. The objective of this study was to assess barcoding of environmental DNA as a method for monitoring invertebrate ecosystem service providers in soil samples.
2. We selected 26 invertebrate ecosystem service providers that occur in New Zealand kiwifruit or apple orchards and produced mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase gene subunit I (cytochrome oxidase I) and/or 28S ribosomal DNA sequences for each. Specific barcode primers were designed for each invertebrate ecosystem service provider and tested, along with generic barcoding cytochrome oxidase I primers, for their ability to detect DNA from invertebrate ecosystem service providers that had been added to sterilized and unsterilized soil samples.
3. Although the specific primers accurately detected the invertebrate ecosystem service providers in more than 96% of the samples, the generic cytochrome oxidase I primers detected only 37% of the invertebrate ecosystem service providers added to the sterilized samples and 2.5% in the unsterilized samples.
4. In a field test, we compared metabarcoding with traditional invertebrate trapping methods to detect the invertebrate ecosystem service providers in 10 kiwifruit and 10 apple orchards. All invertebrate ecosystem service providers were collected in traps in at least one orchard, but very few were identified by metabarcoding of soil environmental DNA.
5. Although the specific primers can be used as a tool for monitoring invertebrate ecosystem service providers in soil samples, methodological improvements are needed before metabarcoding of soil environmental DNA can be used to monitor these taxa.