The 1.688 repetitive DNA of Drosophila: concerted evolution at different genomic scales and association with genes

Concerted evolution leading to homogenization of tandemly repeated DNA arrays is widespread and important for genome evolution. We investigated the range and nature of the process at chromosomal and array levels using the 1.688 tandem repeats of Drosophila melanogaster where large arrays are present in the heterochromatin of chromosomes 2, 3, and X, and short arrays are found in the euchromatin of the same chromosomes. Analysis of 326 euchromatic and heterochromatic repeats from 52 arrays showed that the homogenization of 1.688 repeats occurred differentially for distinct genomic regions, from euchromatin to heterochromatin and from local arrays to chromosomes. We further found that most euchromatic arrays are either close to, or are within introns of, genes. The short size of euchromatic arrays (one to five repeats) could be selectively constrained by their role as gene regulators, a situation similar to the so-called "tuning knobs."     

Molecular cytogenetic analysis of durum wheat x tritordeum hybrids.

Southern and in situ hybridization were used to examine the chromosome constitution, genomic relationships, repetitive DNA sequences, and nuclear architecture in durum wheat x tritordeum hybrids (2n = 5x = 35), where tritordeum is the fertile amphiploid (2n = 6x = 42) between Hordeum chilense and durum wheat. Using in situ hybridization, H. chilense total genomic DNA hybridized strongly to the H. chilense chromosomes and weakly to the wheat chromosomes, which showed some strongly labelled bands. pHcKB6, a cloned repetitive sequence isolated from H. chilense, enabled the unequivocal identification of each H. chilense chromosome at metaphase. Analysis of chromosome disposition in prophase nuclei, using the same probes, showed that the chromosomes of H. chilense origin were in individual domains with only limited intermixing with chromosomes of wheat origin. Six major sites of 18S-26S rDNA genes were detected on the chromosomes of the hybrids. Hybridization to Southern transfers of restriction enzyme digests using genomic DNA showed some variants of tandem repeats, perhaps owing to methylation. Both techniques gave complementary information, extending that available from phenotypic, chromosome morphology, or isozyme analysis, and perhaps are useful for following chromosomes or chromosome segments during further crossing of the lines in plant breeding programs.     

Influenza H5N1 virus infection of polarized human alveolar epithelial cells and lung microvascular endothelial cells

Background

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus is entrenched in poultry in Asia and Africa and continues to infect humans zoonotically causing acute respiratory disease syndrome and death. There is evidence that the virus may sometimes spread beyond respiratory tract to cause disseminated infection. The primary target cell for HPAI H5N1 virus in human lung is the alveolar epithelial cell. Alveolar epithelium and its adjacent lung microvascular endothelium form host barriers to the initiation of infection and dissemination of influenza H5N1 infection in humans. These are polarized cells and the polarity of influenza virus entry and egress as well as the secretion of cytokines and chemokines from the virus infected cells are likely to be central to the pathogenesis of human H5N1 disease.

Aim

To study influenza A (H5N1) virus replication and host innate immune responses in polarized primary human alveolar epithelial cells and lung microvascular endothelial cells and its relevance to the pathogenesis of human H5N1 disease.

Methods

We use an in vitro model of polarized primary human alveolar epithelial cells and lung microvascular endothelial cells grown in transwell culture inserts to compare infection with influenza A subtype H1N1 and H5N1 viruses via the apical or basolateral surfaces.

Results

We demonstrate that both influenza H1N1 and H5N1 viruses efficiently infect alveolar epithelial cells from both apical and basolateral surface of the epithelium but release of newly formed virus is mainly from the apical side of the epithelium. In contrast, influenza H5N1 virus, but not H1N1 virus, efficiently infected polarized microvascular endothelial cells from both apical and basolateral aspects. This provides a mechanistic explanation for how H5N1 virus may infect the lung from systemic circulation. Epidemiological evidence has implicated ingestion of virus-contaminated foods as the source of infection in some instances and our data suggests that viremia, secondary to, for example, gastro-intestinal infection, can potentially lead to infection of the lung. HPAI H5N1 virus was a more potent inducer of cytokines (e.g. IP-10, RANTES, IL-6) in comparison to H1N1 virus in alveolar epithelial cells, and these virus-induced chemokines were secreted onto both the apical and basolateral aspects of the polarized alveolar epithelium.

Conclusion

The predilection of viruses for different routes of entry and egress from the infected cell is important in understanding the pathogenesis of influenza H5N1 infection and may help unravel the pathogenesis of human H5N1 disease.     

The self-incompatibility mating system of the olive (Olea europaea L.) functions with dominance between S-alleles

The self-incompatibility type is of key importance to understanding pollination in orchards, because most olive cultivars are partially self-incompatible and thus require pollinizers to ensure fruit set. The gametophytic model has been advocated to function in the olive, but no allele pair has been attributed to any variety. The GSI model failed in most combinations to explain fruit set. Olive growers must screen experimentally and empirically to look for inter-compatible pair-wise combinations of varieties for optimum pollination. The sporophytic model, with given dominance relationships for six S-alleles matches 98 % of the experimental data of the two sets investigated. We propose a method to analyze data from controlled crosses between olive cultivars applied to two experiments for varieties crossed in a diallel design. Furthermore, the dominance between the S-allele pair allows rational prediction of olive variety self-incompatibility levels. The S-allele pairs were unraveled for more than 60 cultivars. To go further, crosses between reference varieties—those in which the S-allele pair was unraveled—and varieties under experimentation (VarE) with an unknown S-allele pair will enable an increase in knowledge and the choice of the best pollinizers in silico. Nevertheless, we pose outstanding questions in orchards where open-pollination efficiency with varieties harboring the R2R3, R1R3, R1R5, or R3R5 pairs. These S-allele pairs require pollen grains without R2 or R3 , R1 or R3, and R3 or R5 determinants. Such pollinizer varieties are not abundant in France and Italy, and this questions whether their spread is sufficient for optimal pollination of main varieties.