Cyanobiont specificity in some Nostoc-containing lichens and in a Peltigera aphthosa photosymbiodeme

The cyanobacterial symbionts in some Nostoc -containing lichens were investigated using the nucleotide sequence of the highly variable cyanobacterial tRNA^Leu (UAA) intron. When comparing different Nostoc -containing lichens, identical intron sequences were found in different samples of the same lichen species collected from two remote areas. This was true for all species where this comparison was made ( Peltigera aphthosa (L.) Willd., P. canina (L.) Willd. and Nephroma arcticum (L.) Torss.). With one exception, a specific intron sequence was never found in more than one lichen species. However, for two of the species, Peltigera aphthosa and Nephroma arcticum , two different cyanobionts were found in different samples. By examining a P. aphthosa photosymbiodeme it could be shown that the same Nostoc is present in both bipartite and tripartite lobes of this lichen. It is thus possible for one cyanobiont/ Nostoc to form the physiologically different symbioses that are found in bipartite and tripartite lichens. The connection between photobiont identity and secondary chemistry is discussed, as a correlation between differences in secondary chemistry and different cyanobionts/ Nostoc s in the species Peltigera neopolydactyla (Gyeln.) Gyeln. was observed. It is concluded that more knowledge concerning the photobiont will give us valuable information on many aspects of lichen biology.     

Methane (CH4) release from littoral wetlands of Boreal lakes during an extended flooding period

Lake littoral zones have a transitional nature and dynamic conditions, which are reflected in their CH₄ emissions. Thus, detailed studies are needed to assess the littoral CH₄ emissions in a regional scale. In this study, CH₄ fluxes were followed during the ice‐free seasons in 1998 and 1999 by using the static chamber method in the littoral zone of two lakes in Finland. An exceptionally high water level in 1998 caused an unusually long inundation in otherwise ephemerally flooded zone. The flooding was normal in year 1999. The factors controlling CH₄ emissions were examined and statistical response functions were constructed. Further, the effect of extended flooding on the littoral CH₄ budged was estimated. The methane flux was primarily regulated by the water level in grass and sedge dominated eulittoral zone, but not in infralittoral reed and water lily stands. Methane emissions in the sedge dominated zone decreased significantly, when the flood was high enough to submerge the venting structures of the plants. Besides water level, sediment temperature determined CH₄ emission. The cumulative CH₄ emissions from the whole littoral wetlands in wet year were 1.1 times (L. Kevätön), or 0.61 and 0.79 times (L. Mekrijärvi) those in dry year. The crucial factor was the discrepancy between the exceptional and the average water level. The extension of inundated area does not necessarily increase CH₄ emissions if the flood reaches infrequently inundated areas, which apparently have low CH₄ production potential. This is the case especially, if the emissions in lower zones simultaneously decrease due to high water level. Our study analyses these complex responses between CH₄ emissions and water level.