目的:探讨CT灌注成像在兔早期肝硬化诊断中的应用价值。方法:将55只新西兰大白兔随机分为2组,其中实验组45只,对照组10只。实验组给予皮下注射葡萄籽油稀释的50%CCL4,1次/4天,前4次剂量为1.0 m L/kg,第5次剂量为1.35 m L/kg,共注射20次。对照组采用同样方法只注射相同剂量的生理盐水。每注射4次后分别对实验组兔7只和正常对照组兔2只做螺旋CT灌注扫描,分析灌注参数,同时做相应的病理学观察,将二者进行比较及统计学分析。结果:注药4次末,兔血清ALT及AST明显高于注药前,注药8次末,兔血清ALT及AST最高,之后兔血清ALT及AST轻度减低,注药前后兔血清ALT及AST的变化有统计学意义(P0.05)。而血清(ALB)水平变化不明显,仅在注药16次末后,ALB水平稍减低,但差异无统计学意义。对照组肝脏灌注参数正常,实验组从注药4次开始,HAP呈上升趋势,但注药4次末及注药8次末,实验组及对照组之间差异无统计学意义(P0.1),注药12次末后二者之间差异有统计学意义(P0.05);而HPP、HBF及HBV呈下降趋势,MTT逐渐延长,与对照组的差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。随兔血清ALT及AST的升高,HAP逐渐升高,MTT逐渐延长,而HPP、HBF及HBV逐渐减低。实验组肝小叶正常结构破坏,肝实质被纤维组织分割成大小不一、圆形或近圆形结节(假小叶),间隔较窄,炎症轻,结节边界尚整齐;汇管区内门脉小支扩张,壁增厚。对照组肝小叶结构规整,肝板排列有序,汇管区无扩大,其内个别炎细胞浸润,肝小叶内偶见点灶状坏死。结论:全肝CT灌注功能成像可为早期肝硬化的诊断提供影像学依据,将灌注征象与病理学变化结合有利于肝硬化的早期诊断和治疗。 相似文献
The plasma level of the inflammatory biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a strong predictor of disease development and premature mortality in the general population. Unhealthy lifestyle habits such as smoking or unhealthy eating is known to elevate the suPAR level. We aimed to investigate whether change in lifestyle habits impact on the suPAR level, and whether the resultant levels are associated with mortality.
Results
Paired suPAR measurements from baseline- and the 5-year visit of the population-based Inter99 study were compared with the habits of diet, smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity. Paired suPAR measurements for 3225 individuals were analyzed by linear regression, adjusted for demographics and lifestyle habits. Compared to individuals with a healthy lifestyle, an unhealthy diet, low physical activity, and daily smoking were associated with a 5.9, 12.8, and 17.6% higher 5-year suPAR, respectively. During 6.1 years of follow-up after the 5-year visit, 1.6% of those with a low suPAR (mean 2.93 ng/ml) died compared with 3.8% of individuals with a high suPAR (mean 4.73 ng/ml), P < 0.001. In Cox regression analysis, adjusted for demographics and lifestyle, the hazard ratio for mortality per 5-year suPAR doubling was 2.03 (95% CI: 1.22–3.37).
Conclusion
Lifestyle has a considerable impact on suPAR levels; the combination of unhealthy habits was associated with 44% higher 5-year suPAR values and the 5-year suPAR was a strong predictor of mortality. We propose suPAR as a candidate biomarker for lifestyle changes as well as the subsequent risk of mortality.