How reliable are dung counts for estimating elephant numbers?

Dung counts are the most commonly used techniques for estimating elephant numbers in forests, yet there is considerable scepticism concerning their accuracy. Published accounts of dung counts show that they give estimates similar to those from other methods for vertebrates ranging in size from lizards to elephants. For ungulates, macropods and elephants there are strong correlations between estimates from dung counts and other methods. Thus, dung counts are as accurate or inaccurate as other methods for estimating vertebrate numbers, including elephants. Dung counts for elephants give estimates that are as precise as, and sometimes more precise than, those from aerial surveys of elephants. This is because the variance in dung density is usually low and results in a lower than expected variance for the final elephant estimate when combined with the variances of defecation and decay rates. Dung counts may be more appropriate than aerial surveys for monitoring small or declining elephant populations.     

Comparison of the roles of neurohormones in the regulation of blood distribution from the hearts of American and Japanese lobsters

The decapod cardiovascular system consists of a single ventricle that pumps blood into seven arteries; previous work has shown that the outflow distribution patterns of intact animals are variable. In the present study, flow recordings were made from pairs of arteries in semi-isolated hearts whilst different cardioactive hormones were infused into the heart. Each hormone (5-hydroxytryptamine, octopamine, dopamine, proctolin and F1) changed the outflow pattern, heart rate and ventricular pressure in a unique way. The probable sites of hormone action are the cardioarterial valves located at the origin of each artery except one, the dorsal abdominal. Outflow from the dorsal abdominal is controlled downstream by valves located at the origin of the segmental lateral arteries. The responses to a particular hormone were sometimes different between the hearts of American and Japanese lobsters. Accepted: 11 May 1998     

Population cycles can maintain foraging polymorphism

The maintenance of genetic variability in morphological traits that affect fitness is poorly understood. We present a simple Mendelian model of genetic traits affecting foraging efficiency in grazing ungulates, based on a trade-off between rates of energy extraction at low versus high levels of plant abundance. The model suggests that variation in foraging efficiency could be maintained via lottery competition arising as a direct consequence of dynamically unstable interactions between consumers and their food resources. Lottery competition is a plausible mechanism for explaining wide variability in foraging efficiency, such as that documented in unstable Soay sheep populations on the St Kilda archipelago.