Nuclear membranous whorls

Summary Membranous whorls have been seen in the nuclei of peritoneal and testicular cells which had been subjected to various experimental manoeuvres. It seems likely that this is an early manifestation of cell degeneration which is demonstrated readily only by glutaraldehyde fixation, and to that extent can be regarded as a glutaraldehyde artifact. Acknowledgements. This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council, and the University of Sheffield Tuberculosis Research Fund, and by a grant to the Department from Unilever Ltd.I am grateful to Professor R. Barer for his advice and criticism, to Dr. G. A. Meek for guidance on electron microscopy, to Dr. E. J. Clegg for permission to use material from joint experiments. Technical and photographic assistance was provided by Messrs. P. GarLick and L. Murgatroyd and by Miss M. Tune.     

A fluorescence depolarization study of the orientational distribution of crossbridges in muscle fibres

A fluorescence depolarization study of the orientational distribution of crossbridges in dye-labelled muscle fibres is presented. The characterization of this distribution is important since the rotation of crossbridges is a key element in the theory of muscle contraction. In this study we exploited the advantages of angle-resolved experiments to characterize the principal features of the orientational distribution of the crossbridges in the muscle fibre. The directions of the transition dipole moments in the frame of the dye and the orientation and motion of the dye relative to the crossbridge determined previously were explicitly incorporated into the analysis of the experimental data. This afforded the unequivocal determination of all the second and fourth rank order parameters. Moreover, this additional information provided discrimination between different models for the orientational behaviour of the crossbridges. Our results indicate that no change of orientation takes place upon a transition from rigor to relaxation. The experiments, however, do no rule out a conformational change of the myosin S 1 during the transition. Correspondence to: Y. K. Levine