Physiological properties of newly formed synapses between sympathetic preganglionic neurons and sympathetic ganglion neurons.

We have examined the physiological properties of transmission at newly formed synapses between sympathetic preganglionic neurons and sympathetic ganglion neurons in vitro. Chick neurons were labeled with fluorescent carbocyanine dyes before they were placed into culture (Honig and Hume, 1986), and were studied by making intracellular recordings during the first 2 weeks of coculture. Evoked monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were not observed until 48 h of coculture. Beyond this time, the frequency with which connected pairs could be found did not vary greatly with time. With repetitive stimulation, the evoked monosynaptic EPSPs fluctuated in amplitude from trial to trial and showed depression at frequencies as low as 1 Hz. To gain further information about the quantitative properties of transmission at newly formed synapses, we analyzed the pattern of fluctuations of delayed release EPSPs. In mature systems, delayed release EPSPs are known to represent responses to single quanta, or to the synchronous release of a small number of quanta. For more than half of the connections we studied, the histograms of delayed release EPSPs were extremely broad. This result suggested that either quantal responses are drawn from a continuous distribution that has a large coefficient of variation or that there are several distinct size classes of quantal responses. The pattern of fluctuations of monosynaptic EPSPs was consistent with both of these possibilities, and was inconsistent with the possibility that monosynaptic EPSPs are composed of quantal subunits with very little intrinsic variation. Although variation in the size of responses to single quanta might arise in a number of ways, one attractive explanation for our results is that the density and type of acetylcholine receptors varies among the different synaptic sites on the surface of developing sympathetic ganglion neurons.     

Quantifying Characters: Polygenist Anthropologists and the Hardening of Heredity

Scholars studying the history of heredity suggest that during the 19th-century biologists and anthropologists viewed characteristics as a collection of blended qualities passed on from the parents. Many argued that those characteristics could be very much affected by environmental circumstances, which scholars call the inheritance of acquired characteristics or “soft” heredity. According to these accounts, Gregor Mendel reconceived heredity – seeing distinct hereditary units that remain unchanged by the environment. This resulted in particular traits that breed true in succeeding generations, or “hard” heredity. The author argues that polygenist anthropology (an argument that humanity consisted of many species) and anthropometry in general should be seen as a hardening of heredity. Using a debate between Philadelphia anthropologist and physician, Samuel G. Morton, and Charleston naturalist and reverend, John Bachman, as a springboard, the author contends that polygenist anthropologists hardened heredity by conceiving of durable traits that might reappear even after a race has been eliminated. Polygenists saw anthropometry (the measurement of humans) as one method of quantifying hereditary qualities. These statistical ranges were ostensibly characteristics that bred true and that defined racial groups. Further, Morton’s interest in hybridity and racial mixing demonstrates that the polygenists focused as much on the transmission and recognition of “amalgamations” of characters as they did on racial categories themselves. The author suggests that seeing race science as the study of heritable, statistical characteristics rather than broad categories helps explain why “race” is such a persistent cultural phenomenon.