Where Is the Theory in Visual Anthropology?

Is there a real theoretical underpinning for visual anthropology? Or are we just borrowing theoretical concepts, as needed, from other disciplines? Here eight visual anthropologists offer their thoughts on this fundamental question succinctly.     

Surviving at the extreme: Chimpanzee ranging is not restricted in a deforested human‐dominated landscape in Uganda

Endangered wildlife increasingly inhabits human‐dominated landscapes outside protected areas. Large‐bodied mammals require large spaces, and their ranging may be especially impacted by landscape modifications including farming, road development and urbanisation. We studied the Wagaisa community of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in Uganda, which inhabit a landscape characterised by high human population density, widespread deforestation, and rapid agricultural and infrastructural development. We aimed to assess whether this dynamic, fragmented environment constrains the chimpanzees’ ranging, and to identify critical habitat patches to aid their conservation. During March–May 2018, we assessed range use from locations of direct observations and indirect signs, corroborated by longer‐term behavioural monitoring of the chimpanzees (June 2018–December 2019). No evidence of limited ranging was found. The Wagaisa chimpanzees used an area measuring ≥ 43 km² (100% MCP) and ranged extensively in the anthropogenic matrix. Most frequently used parts of the range (‘core habitat areas’) centred around small (5–20 acres), widely dispersed remnant forest patches and exotic eucalyptus plantations. Forty per cent of chimpanzee nests were constructed in eucalyptus trees, suggesting a behavioural adjustment to landscape changes. Actions to facilitate conservation of these ‘village chimpanzees’ and others surviving in transformed human‐dominated habitat need not conflict with the sustainable development of the region.     

From forest to farm: systematic review of cultivar feeding by chimpanzees--management implications for wildlife in anthropogenic landscapes

Crop-raiding is a major source of conflict between people and wildlife globally, impacting local livelihoods and impeding conservation. Conflict mitigation strategies that target problematic wildlife behaviours such as crop-raiding are notoriously difficult to develop for large-bodied, cognitively complex species. Many crop-raiders are generalist feeders. In more ecologically specialised species crop-type selection is not random and evidence-based management requires a good understanding of species' ecology and crop feeding habits. Comprehensive species-wide studies of crop consumption by endangered wildlife are lacking but are important for managing human-wildlife conflict. We conducted a comprehensive literature search of crop feeding records by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), a ripe-fruit specialist. We assessed quantitatively patterns of crop selection in relation to species-specific feeding behaviour, agricultural exposure, and crop availability. Crop consumption by chimpanzees is widespread in tropical Africa. Chimpanzees were recorded to eat a considerable range of cultivars (51 plant parts from 36 species). Crop part selection reflected a species-typical preference for fruit. Crops widely distributed in chimpanzee range countries were eaten at more sites than sparsely distributed crops. We identified 'high' and 'low' conflict crops according to their attractiveness to chimpanzees, taking account of their importance as cash crops and/or staple foods to people. Most (86%) high conflict crops were fruits, compared to 13% of low conflict crops. Some widely farmed cash or staple crops were seldom or never eaten by chimpanzees. Information about which crops are most frequently consumed and which are ignored has enormous potential for aiding on-the-ground stakeholders (i.e. farmers, wildlife managers, and conservation and agricultural extension practitioners) develop sustainable wildlife management schemes for ecologically specialised and protected species in anthropogenic habitats. However, the economic and subsistence needs of local people, and the crop-raiding behaviour of sympatric wildlife, must be considered when assessing suitability of particular crops for conflict prevention and mitigation.     

Dispersal of a Human-Cultivated Crop by Wild Chimpanzees (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Pan troglodytes verus</Emphasis>) in a Forest–Farm Matrix

With the conversion of natural habitats to farmland, nonhuman primates (hereafter primates) are increasingly exposed to agricultural crops. Although frugivorous primates are important seed dispersers that sometimes feed on agricultural fruits, evidence for dispersal of crops by primates is lacking. Here, we examine flexible feeding on cacao (Theobroma cacao) fruit and seed dispersal patterns by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) at Bossou in Guinea, and consequent cacao germination and survival. From direct observations, we confirm that cacao fruit is not an important food to chimpanzees, representing 0.23 % of focal animal feeding time. Chimpanzees ingest cacao pulp and either spit out the large seeds intact from unripe cacao fruit or swallow the seeds from ripe cacao fruits, which are consequently deposited in feces. From ecological surveys we show that chimpanzees distributed cacao extensively throughout their home range, at a mean distance of 407 m?±?SE 0.6 (N?=?90 clusters, range: 4–1130 m) from cacao plantations. As distance from the cacao plantation increased, cacao plants were more likely to survive. Other factors, including number of cacao plants in a cluster, plant height, and openness of the understory did not predict short-term cacao survival. Cacao plants within the forest did not produce fruit. By contrast, when chimpanzees deposited seeds in a plantation, cacao plants produced fruits as a result of farmers’ maintenance of the area. Our local-scale findings emphasize the complex behavioral and ecological interconnections between coexisting humans and primates in agricultural landscapes and generate interesting questions regarding primate niche construction and crop “ownership” related to who “plants” the crop.     

Identification of four GyrA residues involved in the DNA breakage-reunion reaction of DNA gyrase

DNA supercoiling by DNA gyrase involves the cleavage of a DNA helix, the passage of another helix through the break, and the religation of the first helix. The cleavage-religation reaction involves the formation of a 5'-phosphotyrosine intermediate with the GyrA subunit of the gyrase (A(2)B(2)) complex. We report the characterization of mutations near the active-site tyrosine residue in GyrA predicted to affect the cleavage-religation reaction of gyrase. We find that mutations at Arg32, Arg47, His78 and His80 inhibit DNA supercoiling and other reactions of gyrase. These effects are caused by the involvement of these residues in the DNA cleavage reaction; religation is largely unaffected by these mutations. We show that these residues cooperate with the active-site tyrosine residue on the opposite subunit of the GyrA dimer during the cleavage-religation reaction.     

Extended acclimatization is required to eliminate stress effects of periodic blood-sampling procedures on vasoactive hormones and blood volume in beagle dogs

Important in all experimental animal studies is the need to control stress stimuli associated with environmental change and experimental procedures. As the stress response involves alterations in levels of vasoactive hormones, ensuing changes in cardiovascular parameters may confound experimental outcomes. Accordingly, we evaluated the duration required for dogs (n = 4) to acclimatized to frequent blood sampling that involved different procedures. On each sampling occasion during a 6-week period, dogs were removed from their pen to a laboratory area and blood was collected either by venepuncture (days 2, 15, 34, 41) for plasma renin activity (PRA), epinephrine (EPI), norepinephrine, aldosterone, insulin, and atrial natriuretic peptide, or by cannulation (dogs restrained in slings; days 1, 8, 14, 22, 30, 33, 37, 40) for determination of haematocrit (HCT) alone (days 1 to 22) or HCT with plasma volume (PV; days 30 to 40). PRA was higher on days 2 and 15 compared with days 34 and 41 and had decreased by up to 48% by the end of the study (day 41 vs day 15; mean/SEM: 1.18/0.27 vs 2.88/0.79 ng ANG I/ml/h, respectively). EPI showed a time-related decrease from days 2 to 34, during which mean values had decreased by 51% (mean/SEM: 279/29 vs 134/20.9 pg/ml for days 2 and 34, respectively), but appeared stable from then on. None of the other hormones showed any significant variability throughout the course of the study. HCT was relatively variable between days 1 to 22 but stabilized from day 30, after which all mean values were approximately 6% lower than those between days 1 and 8. We conclude that an acclimatization period of at least 4 weeks is required to eliminate stress-related effects in dogs associated with periodic blood sampling.     

Bid chimeras indicate that most BH3-only proteins can directly activate Bak and Bax,and show no preference for Bak versus Bax

The mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis is initiated by Bcl-2 homology region 3 (BH3)-only members of the Bcl-2 protein family. On upregulation or activation, certain BH3-only proteins can directly bind and activate Bak and Bax to induce conformation change, oligomerization and pore formation in mitochondria. BH3-only proteins, with the exception of Bid, are intrinsically disordered and therefore, functional studies often utilize peptides based on just their BH3 domains. However, these reagents do not possess the hydrophobic membrane targeting domains found on the native BH3-only molecule. To generate each BH3-only protein as a recombinant protein that could efficiently target mitochondria, we developed recombinant Bid chimeras in which the BH3 domain was replaced with that of other BH3-only proteins (Bim, Puma, Noxa, Bad, Bmf, Bik and Hrk). The chimeras were stable following purification, and each immunoprecipitated with full-length Bcl-x_L according to the specificity reported for the related BH3 peptide. When tested for activation of Bak and Bax in mitochondrial permeabilization assays, Bid chimeras were ~1000-fold more effective than the related BH3 peptides. BH3 sequences from Bid and Bim were the strongest activators, followed by Puma, Hrk, Bmf and Bik, while Bad and Noxa were not activators. Notably, chimeras and peptides showed no apparent preference for activating Bak or Bax. In addition, within the BH3 domain, the h0 position recently found to be important for Bax activation, was important also for Bak activation. Together, our data with full-length proteins indicate that most BH3-only proteins can directly activate both Bak and Bax.The Bcl-2 family of proteins controls the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis, a process often dysregulated in cancer and other diseases.^{1, 2, 3} Apoptotic triggers including DNA damage and oncogene activation cause the synthesis or activation of one or more pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 homology region 3 (BH3)-only proteins,^{1, 2, 3, 4} a subfamily that includes Bid, Bim, Puma, Noxa, Bad, Bik, Bmf and Hrk. These proteins then engage via their BH3 domain with other Bcl-2 family members. BH3-only proteins that can directly bind and activate the Bcl-2 effector proteins Bak or Bax are called ‘activators''.⁵ When Bak or Bax become activated and oligomerize in the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM), the apoptotic ‘switch'' has flipped and the cell is committed to cell death. The prosurvival members (Bcl-2, Bcl-x_L, Mcl-1, Bcl-w, Bfl-1/A1 and Bcl-B) inhibit apoptosis by specifically binding both the BH3-only proteins and activated Bak and Bax.^{6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11} Thus, the cell''s complement of prosurvival proteins, Bak, and Bax, determines the sensitivity of that cell to each BH3-only protein, and by extension to each type of pro-apoptotic stimulus.A thorough understanding of BH3-only proteins is crucial for the development of cancer therapeutics such as the new class of anti-cancer molecules called BH3 mimetics that are showing significant promise in clinical trials.^{12, 13} The binding of BH3-only proteins to prosurvival proteins has been well-characterized and revealed significant preferences for engaging different members.^{6, 8, 9} How BH3-only proteins bind and activate Bak and Bax remains less understood for several reasons. First, generating stable recombinant BH3-only proteins is difficult because, except for Bid, they are intrinsically disordered^{14, 15, 16} and because most contain hydrophobic C-terminal membrane anchors.¹⁷ Thus, most in vitro studies of BH3-only proteins have used synthetic peptides corresponding to the BH3 domains, C-terminally truncated recombinant proteins or in vitro translated (IVT) proteins. Second, BH3-only reagents bind poorly to recombinant Bak and Bax in the absence of membranes, although detergents and liposomes may substitute for the MOM.^{18, 19, 20} Third, activation of Bak and Bax on mitochondria can be complicated by the presence of other proteins such as prosurvival proteins. Indeed, genetically altering BH3-only protein levels in mice resulted in complex phenotypes due to multiple interactions between family members, precluding firm conclusions as to which BH3-only proteins are direct activators.^{18, 21, 22}Bid and Bim are direct activators according to a variety of approaches,^{5, 8, 9, 23, 24} and were recently proposed to be specific for Bak and Bax, respectively.²⁵ Early studies using Noxa BH3 peptides^{5, 8} and IVT Noxa⁹ concluded that Noxa was not an activator. However, in more recent studies a Noxa BH3 peptide²³ and purified recombinant NoxaΔC²⁰ were found to be activators of both Bak and Bax. Puma has also been described as both an activator^{26, 27} and not an activator.^{8, 28} Du et al.²³ analyzed the full panel of BH3 peptides and classified Bim as a strong activator, Bid, Noxa and Bmf as moderate activators, and Puma, Bik and Hrk as weak activators. The only BH3-only member that has never been described as an activator is Bad.While BH3 peptides and recombinant truncated BH3-only proteins have been useful for in vitro studies, new reagents that target mitochondria may better reflect the behavior of the parent proteins. As Bid is stable as a recombinant protein, we generated chimeras of Bid in which the BH3 domain of Bid was replaced with that of seven other BH3-only proteins. This is a similar approach to the Bim chimeras used for expression in cells¹⁸ and in mice.²⁹ More recently, truncated Bid (tBid) chimeras containing the BH3 domains of Bim, Bak and Bax as well as those of the prosurvival proteins, have been generated as IVT proteins.¹¹To compare the ability of BH3-only proteins to activate Bak and Bax in vitro, we incubated Bid chimeras and BH3 peptides with mitochondria containing either Bak or Bax. We found that the membrane-targeted Bid chimeras were much more potent activators than their related BH3 peptides, and that all BH3 domains except for Bad and Noxa were activators to some extent. We conclude that activation of Bak and Bax may be underestimated by studies using BH3 peptides, and that even BH3-only proteins such as Bik, Bmf and Hrk that are often considered unable to activate Bak or Bax, may act as activators under certain conditions.