Demonstration of an “Excitation-Contraction Recoupling” Mechanism in Mammalian Ventricular Myocardium

A PROCESS called “excitation-contraction coupling” has been generally accepted to take place only in the direction of excitation to contraction. Through this mechanism a propagated action potential initiates an active state in skeletal or cardiac muscle and the muscle contracts. We propose that, in the mammalian ventricular myocardium at least, the process is not unidirectional and an important reverse coupling between the contractile system and the excitable plasma membrane has been overlooked. Through this feedback interaction the mode of contraction (that is, isotonic or isometric) not only determines the instantaneous electrical state of the plasma membrane, but also influences the mechanical events of the subsequent beats. Thus when Kaufmann et al.¹ recorded intracellular action potentials from cat papillary muscle, the time course of the repolarization was altered depending on the mode of contraction. Some kind of contraction-excitation feedback has also been suggested by Stauch² and Lab^3,4. They showed a difference in the shape of the monophasic action potential, as recorded by a suction electrode, when comparing isotonic and isovolumic contraction of the intact ventricle. But their experimental conditions did not allow satisfactory analysis of the phenomenon.     

The Structure of Calf Liver Cytochrome <Emphasis Type="Italic">b</Emphasis><Subscript>5</Subscript> at 2.8 Å Resolution

CYTOCHROME b₅ is a haem-containing protein in the microsomes of liver tissue. It interacts specifically with a flavo-protein, cytochrome b₅ reductase, which catalyses the transfer of electrons from NADH to the haem iron of the cytochrome¹. The microsomal cytochrome b₅ system has been implicated in fatty acid desaturation reactions² and a similar system in erythrocytes may catalyse the reduction of methaemoglobin³. Calf liver cytochrome b₅, solubilized by pancreatic lipase, has a molecular weight of 11,000 and consists of ninety-three amino-acids in the sequence shown in Fig. 1 (refs. 4 and 5). The haem group is non-covalently bound to the protein and can be removed reversibly by acid acetone treatment⁶.     

Role of the Galactose Binding Protein in Chemotaxis of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> toward Galactose

The galactose binding protein is the part of the galactose chemoreceptor which recognizes the attractants galactose, glucose and a number of structurally related chemicals.     

Ribosomes,G-factor and Siomycin

G-factor interacts with the 50S ribo-somal subunit at a site which is distinct from the peptidyl transferase centre and which is inactivated by siomycin.     

Failure of Neuraminidase to unmask Histocompatibility Antigens on Trophoblast

DURING outbred pregnancy the mother is exposed to genetically foreign tissue because the offspring inherits transplantation antigens from the father. The survival of the foetus is ensured by the intervention of the trophoblast which does not express transplantation antigens between mother and foetus: mouse trophoblast is not rejected even when transplanted into immune recipients^1,3. The mechanism of this failure to express histocompatibility antigens is not understood^1–4, but Kirby et al. have suggested that the extracellular fibrinoid surrounding trophoblast cells is involved^5,6. Currie has suggested that the thick sialomucinous glycocalyx of the trophoblast cell might “mask” the histocompatibility antigens on the trophoblast^7,8 and has demonstrated that neuraminidase unmasked these antigens⁸. Our experiments, however, show that trophoblast incubated with neuraminidase cannot sensitize allogeneic mice to donor histocompatibility antigens. Furthermore, pretreatment of trophoblastic implants with neuraminidase did not interfere with their proliferation and growth in highly immune allogeneic recipients.     

Binding of Radioactively Labelled Concanavalin A and Wheat Germ Agglutinin to Normal and Virus-transformed Cells

VARIOUS substances isolated from plants cause animal cells to clump. Several of these lectins¹ preferentially agglutinate cells which have been transformed spontaneously or by chemicals or viruses^2–7. The best known lectins of this class are concanavalin A (Con A) isolated from jack beans⁸ and wheat germ agglutinin⁴, which seem to bind to carbohydrate groups on the cell surface. The determinants recognized by the lectins seem to be N-acetyl-D-glucosamine for WGA⁴ and probably α-methyl-D-glucopyranoside for Con A⁶.     

Cell-free Studies on the Regulation of the Arabinose Operon

A DNA directed, cell-free system which synthesized L-ribulokinase coded by the L-arabinose operon ara OIBAD, has been developed. L-arabinose but not the araC gene product is required for the expression of this operon and, in addition, cyclic AMP and guanosine tetraphosphate are needed for optimal synthesis.     

Cooperation between Carrier-reactive and Hapten-sensitive Cells <Emphasis Type="Italic">in vitro</Emphasis>

THE mechanism, known as the carrier effect, whereby immunity to one or more determinant groups enhances the response to other determinants on the same multivalent antigen, was first recognized in delayed hypersensitivity to haptens, in which, for an appreciable response, the hapten must be coupled to the same protein carrier for priming and challenge^{1, 2}. Carrier specificity has also been demonstrated in the secondary antibody responses to hapten protein conjugates³. Two alternative hypotheses have been advanced to explain this specificity. The “local environment” hypothesis supposes that the hapten-sensitive cell recognizes both the hapten and the carrier determinants. However, the antihapten antibodies produced do not distinguish details of the carrier molecule and so do not reflect the specificity of the cellular receptor. Furthermore, inert spacer molecules inserted between hapten and carrier do not interfere with carrier specificity in the antibody response³. Reflecting current views on the cooperation between thymus-derived (T) and bone marrow derived (B) lymphocytes in the antibody response to various antigens⁴, the second hypothesis invokes two or more cells, one with receptors directed towards the hapten (hapten-sensitive cell), the others specific for the carrier molecule proper (carrier-reactive cells). Supporting this is the observation that pre-immunization to a particular protein carrier alone could potentiate the primary or secondary antihapten response to a hapten conjugated to that protein⁵. In an adoptive transfer system, moreover, the efficiency of antihapten antibody production by cells primed to a particular hapten-protein conjugate and stimulated with the hapten conjugated on a heterologous protein, is significantly enhanced by the introduction of cells primed to the heterologous carrier alone. Anti-carrier serum antibody does not cause such enhancement⁶. The carrier-reactive cells must therefore cooperate in increasing the efficiency of the hapten-sensitive cells in some way other than by providing humoral anti-carrier antibody. Recent work strongly suggests that carrier reactive cells are thymus-derived^{6, 7}.