Environmental history and physiological state influence feeding responses of Atrina zelandica to suspended sediment concentrations

Epifaunal suspension-feeding bivalves can play important roles in marine ecosystems affecting macrobenthic communities, benthic boundary layers and benthic-pelagic coupling, not just by their presence but also by any changes in feeding behaviour. While seston quality and quantity have consistently been found to be important influences on the feeding rates of suspension-feeding bivalves, factors stressing individuals are also likely to be important, as they may affect energy-dependent thresholds of response. We postulated that (1) history of seston quantity would affect how suspension feeders deal with increases in total suspended particulates, and (2) high-seston concentrations would affect feeding rates more in individuals whose energy reserves were low after spawning. Three sites were selected for short-term (1 day) feeding experiments on the pinnid bivalve, Atrina zelandica. At one site, the experiment was run pre-and postspawning. Atrina exhibited high rejection of filtered particles (mostly 75% to 100%) and high organic absorption efficiencies (0.9-1) at all seston levels. Strong differences in the response of feeding behaviour to increased seston concentrations were observed between A. zelandica from the different sites, with lesser differences observed between times. The site-specific feeding responses to seston concentrations observed are likely to affect our ability to model responses of A. zelandica to sediment loading and to influence the importance of A. zelandica to benthic-pelagic coupling.     

mTORC1 activity is supported by spatial association with focal adhesions

The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) integrates mitogenic and stress signals to control growth and metabolism. Activation of mTORC1 by amino acids and growth factors involves recruitment of the complex to the lysosomal membrane and is further supported by lysosome distribution to the cell periphery. Here, we show that translocation of lysosomes toward the cell periphery brings mTORC1 into proximity with focal adhesions (FAs). We demonstrate that FAs constitute discrete plasma membrane hubs mediating growth factor signaling and amino acid input into the cell. FAs, as well as the translocation of lysosome-bound mTORC1 to their vicinity, contribute to both peripheral and intracellular mTORC1 activity. Conversely, lysosomal distribution to the cell periphery is dispensable for the activation of mTORC1 constitutively targeted to FAs. This study advances our understanding of spatial mTORC1 regulation by demonstrating that the localization of mTORC1 to FAs is both necessary and sufficient for its activation by growth-promoting stimuli.     

Hybridization and speciation

Hybridization has many and varied impacts on the process of speciation. Hybridization may slow or reverse differentiation by allowing gene flow and recombination. It may accelerate speciation via adaptive introgression or cause near‐instantaneous speciation by allopolyploidization. It may have multiple effects at different stages and in different spatial contexts within a single speciation event. We offer a perspective on the context and evolutionary significance of hybridization during speciation, highlighting issues of current interest and debate. In secondary contact zones, it is uncertain if barriers to gene flow will be strengthened or broken down due to recombination and gene flow. Theory and empirical evidence suggest the latter is more likely, except within and around strongly selected genomic regions. Hybridization may contribute to speciation through the formation of new hybrid taxa, whereas introgression of a few loci may promote adaptive divergence and so facilitate speciation. Gene regulatory networks, epigenetic effects and the evolution of selfish genetic material in the genome suggest that the Dobzhansky–Muller model of hybrid incompatibilities requires a broader interpretation. Finally, although the incidence of reinforcement remains uncertain, this and other interactions in areas of sympatry may have knock‐on effects on speciation both within and outside regions of hybridization.     

Opportunistic Predation of Wild Turkey Nests by Wild Pigs

Wild pigs (Sus scrofa; i.e., feral hogs, feral swine) are considered an invasive species in the United States. Where they occur, they damage agricultural crops and wildlife habitat. Wild pigs also depredate native wildlife, particularly ground-nesting bird species during nesting season. In areas inhabited by wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo), nest destruction caused by wild pigs may affect recruitment. There is debate whether wild pigs actively seek ground-nesting bird nests or depredate them opportunistically. To address this debate, in 2016 we examined the movements of wild pigs relative to artificial wild turkey nests (i.e., control [no artificial nests], moderate density [12.5–25 nests/km²], and high density [25–50 nests/km²]) throughout the nesting season (i.e., early, peak, and late) in south-central Texas, USA. We found no evidence that wild pigs learned to seek and depredate wild turkey nests relative to nest density or nesting periods. Despite wild pigs being important nest predators, depredation was not a functional response to a pulsed food resource and can only be associated with overlapping densities of wild pigs and nests. Protecting reproductive success of wild turkeys will require reducing wild pig densities in nesting habitat prior to nesting season. © 2019 The Wildlife Society.