Establishment and characterization of a primary canine duodenal epithelial cell culture

Many mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of chronic enteropathies or host–pathogen interactions in canine intestine have not been elucidated so far. Next to the clinical and in vivo research tools, an in vitro model of canine intestinal cell culture would be very helpful for studies at the cellular level. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to establish and characterize a primary canine duodenal epithelial cell culture. Neonatal duodenum was disrupted with trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and the mucosa scraped off and digested with collagenase and dispase. After centrifugation on a 2% sorbitol gradient, the cells were incubated at 37° C in OptiMEM supplemented with Primocin, epidermal growth factor, insulin, hydrocortisone, and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). After 24 h, the FCS concentration was reduced to 2.5%, and the temperature decreased to 33° C. With this method, the cultures were growing to confluent monolayers within 5–6 d and remained viable for an average of 2 wk. Their epithelial nature was confirmed by electron microscopy and immunofluorescence staining using antibodies directed against specific cytokeratins, desmosomes, and tight junctions. The intestinal cells proliferated, as evidenced by immunolabeling with a Ki-67 antibody, and cryptal cell subpopulations could be identified. Furthermore, alkaline phosphatase and sucrase activity were detected. Presented in part at the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Forum in Louisville, Kentucky, May 31–June 3, 2006. Julia L. Golaz and Nathalie Vonlaufen contributed equally to this work and are joint first authors. Supported in part by the Vetsuisse research foundation, the Foundation Research 3R (project No. 85/03), and the Swiss National Science Foundation (3100A0-112532).     

Echinococcus multilocularis: the parasite-host interplay

Alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is a severe chronic helminthic disease caused by the intrahepatic tumor-like growth of the metacestode of Echinococcus multilocularis. Metacestodes are fluid-filled, asexually proliferating vesicles, which are entirely covered by the laminated layer, an acellular carbohydrate-rich surface structure that protects the parasite from immunological and physiological reactions on part of the host. The E. multilocularis metacestode has acquired specific means of manipulating and using the immunological host response to its own advantage. These include the expression of distinct immunoregulatory parasite molecules that manipulate and interfere in the functional activity of macrophages and T cells. Recent research findings have led to a better understanding of the protein- and glycoprotein composition of the laminated layer and the E/S fraction of the metacestode, including Em2- and Em492-antigens, two metacestode antigen fractions that exhibit immunosuppressive or -modulatory properties. Understanding of the events taking place at the host-parasite interface is the key for development of novel immuno-therapeutical and/or chemotherapeutical tools.     

Neospora caninum: functional inhibition of protein disulfide isomerase by the broad-spectrum anti-parasitic drug nitazoxanide and other thiazolides

Nitazoxanide (NTZ) and several NTZ-derivatives (thiazolides) have been shown to exhibit considerable anti-Neospora caninum tachyzoite activity in vitro. We coupled tizoxanide (TIZ), the deacetylated metabolite, to epoxy-agarose-resin and performed affinity chromatography with N. caninum tachyzoite extracts. Two main protein bands of 52 and 43kDa were isolated. The 52kDa protein was readily recognized by antibodies directed against NcPDI, and mass spectrometry confirmed its identity. Poly-histidine-tagged NcPDI-cDNA was expressed in Escherichia coli and recombinant NcPDI (recNcPDI) was purified by Co2+-affinity chromatography. By applying an enzyme assay based on the measurement of insulin crosslinking activity, recNcPDI exhibited properties reminiscent for PDIs, and its activity was impaired upon the addition of classical PDI inhibitors such as bacitracin (1-2mM), para-chloromercuribenzoic acid (0.1-1mM) and tocinoic acid (0.1-1mM). RecNcPDI-mediated insulin crosslinking was inhibited by NTZ (5-100 microM) in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, the enzymatic activity of recNcPDI was inhibited by those thiazolides that also affected parasite proliferation. Thus, thiazolides readily interfere with NcPDI, and possibly also with PDIs from other microorganisms susceptible to thiazolides.     

Evaluation of Buprenorphine in a Postoperative Pain Model in Rats

We evaluated the commonly prescribed analgesic buprenorphine in a postoperative pain model in rats, assessing acute postoperative pain relief, rebound hyperalgesia, and the long-term effects of postoperative opioid treatment on subsequent opioid exposure. Rats received surgery (paw incision under isoflurane anesthesia), sham surgery (anesthesia only), or neither and were treated postoperatively with 1 of several doses of subcutaneous buprenorphine. Pain sensitivity to noxious and nonnoxious mechanical stimuli at the site of injury (primary pain) was assessed at 1, 4, 24, and 72 h after surgery. Pain sensitivity at a site distal to the injury (secondary pain) was assessed at 24 and 72 h after surgery. Rats were tested for their sensitivity to the analgesic and locomotor effects of morphine 9 to 10 d after surgery. Buprenorphine at 0.05 mg/kg SC was determined to be the most effective; this dose induced isoalgesia during the acute postoperative period and the longest period of pain relief, and it did not induce long-term changes in opioid sensitivity in 2 functional measures of the opioid system. A lower dose of buprenorphine (0.01 mg/kg SC) did not meet the criterion for isoalgesia, and a higher dose (0.1 mg/kg SC) was less effective in pain relief at later recovery periods and induced a long-lasting opioid tolerance, indicating greater neural adaptations. These results support the use of 0.05 mg/kg SC buprenorphine as the upper dose limit for effective treatment of postoperative pain in rats and suggest that higher doses produce long-term effects on opioid sensitivity.Relief of postoperative pain is mandated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Animals¹⁸ and the Public Health Service Policy¹⁷ and is a major objective of laboratory animal medicine. Buprenorphine is one of the most commonly used opioid analgesics for postoperative pain in laboratory animals, mainly because of its long duration of action.¹⁰ The typical recommended dose range of buprenorphine in rats is 0.02 to 0.05 mg/kg SC.¹⁰ The upper end of this range, although effective at relieving acute postoperative pain in rats, is associated with side effects such as enhanced postoperative pain after the drug has worn off (rebound hyperalgesia),²³ respiratory depression,²¹ nausea or gastrointestinal distress and pica,²⁵ and neural adaptations (for example, sensitization) that may lead to long-term changes in neural function in the central nervous system and consequent changes in behavior.¹⁴ Central sensitization is a well-studied neural adaptation expressed in the brain and spinal cord and induced by nociceptive stimulation (that is, pain-induced by surgical manipulation) that manifests as hyperalgesia (decreased pain threshold to noxious stimuli) and allodynia (appearance of pain-like responses to nonnoxious tactile stimuli) during the recovery period.^16,29 Central sensitization contributes to persistent pain during the postoperative recovery period (that is, maintenance of increased pain sensitivity during tissue recovery) and chronic pain in some pathologic conditions (that is, persistent pain sensitivity after full tissue recovery). Central sensitization also accounts for the spread of hyperalgesia and allodynia to noninjured areas of the body distal to the injury.³¹ This phenomenon is referred to as ‘secondary pain’ (secondary hyperalgesia and allodynia), because it is not directly associated with the primary injury site.Opioid analgesics inhibit pain by acting on the nervous system to block transduction of pain signals traveling in sensory neurons toward the central nervous system and by facilitating activity of the descending pain inhibition neural pathway.¹⁶ Opioid analgesics also induce neural adaptations in the nervous system, phenomena that underlie the pronounced changes in behavior associated with addiction to narcotics.² Notably, opioid analgesics have been shown to enhance central sensitization initiated by pain transmission.^6,8,14,20 This property means that opiate analgesics facilitate both the inhibition of pain and central sensitization that leads to the enhancement of pain. Because central sensitization is a neural adaptation, the interaction of opiates on this pain mechanism outlasts the presence of the drug; in contrast, opiate effects on pain inhibition are limited to the presence of the drug. This arrangement is thought to account for rebound pain, that is, increased pain sensitivity after the opiate analgesic has worn off. Opiate side effects can compromise the success of recovery by increasing the level of distress experienced during recovery (for example, inducing nausea) and possibly increasing the duration of distress during recovery (for example, allowing for rebound pain). Moreover, and of importance specifically to laboratory animal medicine, the general neural adaptations induced by even a single dose of an opiate analgesic²⁶ may induce changes in the nervous system that alter and therefore compromise the validity of the animal model under study (for example, opioid mechanisms involved in behavioral control).We previously evaluated the feasibility of oral administration of buprenorphine.^15,25 As a basis for comparison, we used the ‘gold-standard’ postoperative buprenorphine dose of 0.05 mg/kg SC. The results of those studies showed that oral administration of buprenorphine was not feasible because the dose necessary to produce analgesia comparable to the standard dose of 0.05 mg/kg SC was 10 times the oral dose recommended in the literature and because the resulting concentration of oral buprenorphine was too bitter for rats to ingest voluntarily in a volume of flavored foodstuff that they could eat in a single meal.^15,25 We also observed that both subcutaneous and oral buprenorphine caused conditioned aversion to flavors,²⁵ suggestive of gastrointestinal distress⁵, with a greater effect for the oral route. Our conclusions and the associated clinical recommendation were limited by our presumption that buprenorphine at 0.05 mg/kg SC was the ideal postsurgical dose.An assessment of the literature that established this dose identified 2 problems. First, little or no research had directly assessed the effect of buprenorphine on pain sensitivity in animals in the hyperalgesic state that characterized the postoperative period,²³ and to our knowledge, no study has directly assessed the dose–response function of postsurgical buprenorphine on hyperalgesia. We hypothesized that endogenous opioids activated during the postoperative period²⁴ might act synergistically with buprenorphine to allow adequate relief of postoperative pain with a lower dose of buprenorphine than is necessary in an algesiometric test, thereby making predictions and extrapolations from algesiometric tests inaccurate. Second, we found that little consideration had been given to the consequences of other physiologic effects of buprenorphine on the recovery process (for example, gastrointestinal distress⁵, rebound hyperalgesia, and allodynia). As stated earlier, recent research on central sensitization has determined that although opioid analgesics inhibit pain sensation acutely, they also enhance neural adaptations that account for rebound pain and other long-term chronic pain conditions.^16,28,29,31 We hypothesized secondarily that a lower dose of buprenorphine, if effective acutely, would result in reduced side effects and be less likely to initiate or enhance neural adaptations, such as rebound hyperalgesia and allodynia.The current study had 2 goals. The first was to establish the minimum dose of buprenorphine needed to relieve acute postoperative pain effectively in rats. As a starting point, we defined effective relief of acute pain as the induction of isoalgesia during the postoperative period; isoalgesia is the normal level of pain sensation, in contrast to analgesia (absence of pain sensation) or hypoalgesia (lower-than-normal pain sensation). The second goal was to evaluate the effect of postoperative buprenorphine on factors that slow recovery (that is, rebound hyperalgesia and allodynia) or create long-term changes (that is, sensitization or tolerance to opiates). We tested our hypothesis by using various doses of buprenorphine in a rat model of incisional pain.^3,4,31 This model was selected because it induces cutaneous and muscular pain common to most surgery and generates mild to moderate persistent pain so that both the acute inhibitory effects of the buprenorphine (that is, pain relief) and the lasting effects of buprenorphine (that is, rebound hyperalgesia) could be studied.     

Monoclonal antibody directed against Neospora caninum tachyzoite carbohydrate epitope reacts specifically with apical complex-associated sialylated beta tubulin

Monoclonal antibodies (mabs) were generated against whole sonicated Neospora caninum tachyzoites as immunogen. Initial ELISA screening of the reactivity of hybridoma culture supernatants using the same antigen and antigen treated with sodium periodate prior to antibody binding resulted in the identification of 8 supernatants with reactivity against putative carbohydrate epitopes. Following immunoblotting, mab6D12 (IgG1), binding a 52/48-kDa doublet, and mab6C6 (IgM), binding a 190/180-kDa doublet, were selected for further studies. Immunofluorescence of tachyzoite-infected cultures localized the corresponding epitopes not to the surface, but to interior epitopes at the apical part of N. caninum tachyzoites. During in vitro tachyzoite to bradyzoite stage conversion, mab6C6 labeling translocated toward the cyst periphery, while for mab6D12 no changes in localization were noted. Upon extraction of tachyzoites with the nonionic detergent Triton-X-100, the 52-kDa band recognized by mab6D12 was present exclusively in the insoluble, cytoskeletal fraction of both N. caninum and Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites. Tandem mass spectrometry analysis identified this protein as N. caninum beta tubulin. The 48-kDa band labeled by mab6D12 was a Vero cell protein contamination. The protein(s) reacting with mab6C6 could not be conclusively identified by mass spectrometry. Immunofluorescence consistently failed to label T. gondii tachyzoites, indicating that beta tubulin in T. gondii and N. caninum could be differentially modified or that the reactive epitope in T. gondii is masked. Immunogold TEM of isolated apical cytoskeletal preparations and dual immunofluorescence with antibody to tubulin confirmed that mab6D12 binds to the anterior part of apical complex-associated microtubules. The sodium periodate sensitivity of the beta tubulin associated epitope was confirmed by immunoblotting and ELISA, and treatment of N. caninum cytoskeletal proteins with sialidase prior to mab6D12 labeling resulted in a profound loss of antibody binding, suggesting that mab6D12 reacts with sialylated beta tubulin.