Overexpression of GCN2-type protein kinase in wheat has profound effects on free amino acid concentration and gene expression

A key point of regulation of protein synthesis and amino acid homoeostasis in eukaryotes is the phosphorylation of the α subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) by protein kinase general control nonderepressible (GCN)-2. In this study, a GCN2-type PCR product (TaGCN2) was amplified from wheat (Triticum aestivum) RNA, while a wheat eIF2α homologue was identified in wheat genome data and found to contain a conserved target site for phosphorylation by GCN2. TaGCN2 overexpression in transgenic wheat resulted in significant decreases in total free amino acid concentration in the grain, with free asparagine concentration in particular being much lower than in controls. There were significant increases in the expression of eIF2α and protein phosphatase PP2A, as well as a nitrate reductase gene and genes encoding phosphoserine phosphatase and dihydrodipicolinate synthase, while the expression of an asparagine synthetase (AS1) gene and genes encoding cystathionine gamma-synthase and sulphur-deficiency-induced-1 all decreased significantly. Sulphur deficiency-induced activation of these genes occurred in wild-type plants but not in TaGCN2 overexpressing lines. Under sulphur deprivation, the expression of genes encoding aspartate kinase/homoserine dehydrogenase and 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase was also lower than in controls. The study demonstrates that TaGCN2 plays an important role in the regulation of genes encoding enzymes of amino acid biosynthesis in wheat and is the first to implicate GCN2-type protein kinases so clearly in sulphur signalling in any organism. It shows that manipulation of TaGCN2 gene expression could be used to reduce free asparagine accumulation in wheat grain and the risk of acrylamide formation in wheat products.     

The role of protein kinases in the regulation of plant growth and development

We review the role of protein kinases in plant hormone-mediatedsignalling, nutrient signalling and cell cycle control and in the crosstalkbetween these different contributors to plant growth regulation. The areas ofhormone-mediated signalling covered include ABA-mediated responses to osmoticstress, wounding and pathogen attack, as well as ethylene and cytokininsignalling pathways. These areas involve members of several major protein kinasefamilies, including the SNFl-related protein kinase-2 (SnRK2) subfamily, thecalcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) family, the mitogen activated protein(MAP) kinase family, the glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)- 3/shaggy family and thereceptor-like protein kinase (RPK) family. In the section on nutrient signallingwe review the role of SnRK1 protein kinases in the global regulation of carbonmetabolism, including aspects of sugar sensing and assimilate partitioning, andwhat is known about nitrogen and sulphur nutrient signalling. In the cell cyclesection, we summarise progress in the elucidation of cell cycle control systemsin plants and discuss the interaction between cell cycle control anddevelopment. We expand further on the hypothesis of crosstalk between differentsignalling pathways in a separate section in which we discuss evidence forinteraction between plant growth regulators and the cell cycle, betweendifferent nutrient signalling pathways, between nutrient and cell cyclesignalling and between nutrient and ABA signalling.     

Specificity from the synapsis of DNA elements by the Sfi I endonuclease.

The synapsis of DNA sites is a prerequisite for the reactions of many proteins that act at specific DNA sequences. The requirement for synapsis was investigated by analysing the reactions of Sfi I, a tetrameric restriction enzyme that cleaves DNA only after interacting with two recognition sites. In the presence of Mg2+, oligonucleotide duplexes with the cognate recognition sequence were cleaved rapidly, with cooperative kinetics, while non-cognate duplexes were not cleaved. In the absence of Mg2+, the primary complex formed by Sfi I with cognate DNA contained two duplexes synapsed by the tetramer: a secondary complex containing one duplex was seen only at elevated Sfi I concentrations. In contrast, the principal complex with non-cognate DNA contained one duplex bound to Sfi I. Pairs of non-cognate duplexes, or one cognate and one non-cognate duplex, generally failed to form synaptic complexes. On adding Mg2+to complexes with cognate DNA, cleavage occurred much more rapidly in the synaptic complex than in the secondary complex. DNA synapsis thus acts to enhance the specificity of Sfi I for its recognition sequence, by demanding two cognate sites for a catalytically active complex and by excluding non-cognate sites from the synaptic complex.     

Differences between Ca2+ and Mg2+ in DNA binding and release by the SfiI restriction endonuclease: implications for DNA looping

Many enzymes acting on DNA require Mg²⁺ ions not only for catalysis but also to bind DNA. Binding studies often employ Ca²⁺ as a substitute for Mg²⁺, to promote DNA binding whilst disallowing catalysis. The SfiI endonuclease requires divalent metal ions to bind DNA but, in contrast to many systems where Ca²⁺ mimics Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺ causes SfiI to bind DNA almost irreversibly. Equilibrium binding by wild-type SfiI cannot be conducted with Mg²⁺ present as the DNA is cleaved so, to study the effect of Mg²⁺ on DNA binding, two catalytically-inactive mutants were constructed. The mutants bound DNA in the presence of either Ca²⁺ or Mg²⁺ but, unlike wild-type SfiI with Ca²⁺, the binding was reversible. With both mutants, dissociation was slow with Ca²⁺ but was in one case much faster with Mg²⁺. Hence, Ca²⁺ can affect DNA binding differently from Mg²⁺. Moreover, SfiI is an archetypal system for DNA looping; on DNA with two recognition sites, it binds to both sites and loops out the intervening DNA. While the dynamics of looping cannot be measured with wild-type SfiI and Ca²⁺, it becomes accessible with the mutant and Mg²⁺.     

Molecular phylogenetics and generic assessment in the tribe Morindeae (Rubiaceae–Rubioideae): How to circumscribe Morinda L. to be monophyletic?

Most of the species of the family Rubiaceae with flowers arranged in head inflorescences are currently classified in three distantly related tribes, Naucleeae (subfamily Cinchonoideae) and Morindeae and Schradereae (subfamily Rubioideae). Within Morindeae the type genus Morinda is traditionally and currently circumscribed based on its head inflorescences and syncarpous fruits (syncarps). These characters are also present in some members of its allied genera, raising doubts about the monophyly of Morinda. We perform Bayesian phylogenetic analyses using combined nrETS/nrITS/trnT-F data for 67 Morindeae taxa and five outgroups from the closely related tribes Mitchelleae and Gaertnereae to rigorously test the monophyly of Morinda as currently delimited and assess the phylogenetic value of head inflorescences and syncarps in Morinda and Morindeae and to evaluate generic relationships and limits in Morindeae. Our analyses demonstrate that head inflorescences and syncarps in Morinda and Morindeae are evolutionarily labile. Morinda is highly paraphyletic, unless the genera Coelospermum, Gynochthodes, Pogonolobus, and Sarcopygme are also included. Morindeae comprises four well-supported and morphologically distinct major lineages: Appunia clade, Morinda clade (including Sarcopygme and the lectotype M. royoc), Coelospermum clade (containing Pogonolobus and Morinda reticulata), and Gynochthodes–Morinda clade. Four possible alternatives for revising generic boundaries are presented to establish monophyletic units. We favor the recognition of the four major lineages of Morindeae as separate genera, because this classification reflects the occurrence of a considerable morphological diversity in the tribe and the phylogenetic and taxonomic distinctness of its newly delimited genera.