Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption

Purpose

Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) and Social Life Cycle Analysis (SLCA) are tools acknowledged to have a role to play in the transition towards Sustainable Production and Consumption patterns (SPC). However, the role they play in this transition is seldom discussed, especially for SLCA. In addition, although the importance of taking a life cycle thinking (LCT) in the progression towards SPC seems indisputable, its added value is seldom made explicit. This article wishes to highlight the role of SLCA in the transition towards more sustainable production and consumption patterns and questions the relevance of LCT in this role.

Methods

To answer this question, we first identify the applications of SLCA that correspond to actions that have to be taken in the transition towards SPC based on the SPC and SLCA literature. Then, the relevance of LCT in the context of the different applications identified previously is questioned through a qualitative discursive analysis approach.

Results

The social goal of SPC is poorly discussed, and the SLCA literature can be one source of inspiration to define what this goal could be. On the basis of the UNEP-SETAC (2009) Guidelines’ SLCA ultimate goal, SPC could be a means to improve stakeholders’ social conditions through the improvement of enterprises’ behaviours. The intended applications of SLCA for potentially supporting the improvement of enterprises’ behaviours are found to be the identification of hotspots in order to highlight areas of improvement inside the sphere of influence of the SLCA user and the guidance of purchasing and substitution choices on the basis of enterprises’ behaviours. In this article, it is suggested that, for SLCA to deserve the “LCT label”, it has to capture impact transfers along the products’ life cycle. Otherwise, an “ability-to-act-on” perspective is the proper angle to adopt in the identification of areas of improvement inside the sphere of influence and a “cradle-to-retailer”, the one to adopt when SLCA is used to guide buy/boycott.

Conclusions

Aside from revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in SPC and the raison d’être of LCT, we discuss some considerations which we believe should be taken into account when developing SLCA in the context of SPC. In conclusion, this article points to the importance of framing the use of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment tools in their context of use.     

A Physiological and Behavioral Mechanism for Leaf Herbivore-Induced Systemic Root Resistance

Indirect plant-mediated interactions between herbivores are important drivers of community composition in terrestrial ecosystems. Among the most striking examples are the strong indirect interactions between spatially separated leaf- and root-feeding insects sharing a host plant. Although leaf feeders generally reduce the performance of root herbivores, little is known about the underlying systemic changes in root physiology and the associated behavioral responses of the root feeders. We investigated the consequences of maize (Zea mays) leaf infestation by Spodoptera littoralis caterpillars for the root-feeding larvae of the beetle Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, a major pest of maize. D. virgifera strongly avoided leaf-infested plants by recognizing systemic changes in soluble root components. The avoidance response occurred within 12 h and was induced by real and mimicked herbivory, but not wounding alone. Roots of leaf-infested plants showed altered patterns in soluble free and soluble conjugated phenolic acids. Biochemical inhibition and genetic manipulation of phenolic acid biosynthesis led to a complete disappearance of the avoidance response of D. virgifera. Furthermore, bioactivity-guided fractionation revealed a direct link between the avoidance response of D. virgifera and changes in soluble conjugated phenolic acids in the roots of leaf-attacked plants. Our study provides a physiological mechanism for a behavioral pattern that explains the negative effect of leaf attack on a root-feeding insect. Furthermore, it opens up the possibility to control D. virgifera in the field by genetically mimicking leaf herbivore-induced changes in root phenylpropanoid patterns.Insect herbivores constantly compete for plants as a primary terrestrial source of organic carbon and nitrogen (Denno et al., 1995). Consequently, resource competition is thought to be a major determinant of the distribution and abundance of insects in natural and agricultural systems (Begon et al., 2006). Recent evidence suggests, however, that in many cases, insect herbivore competition may not follow the traditional theoretical assumptions of direct interference and/or resource exploitation, but may be determined by indirect plant-mediated effects (Kaplan and Denno, 2007; Poelman et al., 2008). Among the most striking examples of indirect plant-mediated interactions is the interplay between root- and leaf-feeding insects (Blossey and Hunt-Joshi, 2003). Despite their nonoverlapping feeding niches, leaf and root herbivores determine each other’s performance through shared host plants (Bezemer and van Dam, 2005). Although root feeders can have positive or negative effects on leaf feeders (van Dam and Heil, 2011), the effect of leaf herbivores on root consumers is predominantly negative (Johnson et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2014).Despite the increasing number of examples demonstrating negative effects of leaf attack on root herbivores (Tindall and Stout, 2001; Blossey and Hunt-Joshi, 2003; Soler et al., 2007; Gill et al., 2011), the mechanisms underlying this form of systemic induced resistance remain poorly understood (Erb et al., 2008; Rasmann and Agrawal, 2008). Pieris brassicae, for instance, was found to increase glucosinolate levels in the roots, which correlated with a reduced survival of the root feeder Delia radicum (Soler et al., 2007). Understanding why root feeders perform worse on leaf-infested plants would allow for more detailed investigations regarding the adaptive and evolutionary context of the phenomenon, and may allow for its exploitation in agriculture (for instance, by triggering root resistance through targeted leaf treatments).A promising system to study the mechanisms and agroecological consequences of plant-mediated interactions between herbivores is maize (Zea mays) and its associated pests. In the field, maize is attacked by a suite of herbivores, including leaf feeders, stem borers, and root feeders. The highly specialized root-feeding larvae of the western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera cause significant plant damage and yield loss in the United States and Eastern Europe. Earlier studies demonstrated that D. virgifera attack increases leaf resistance against Spodoptera spp. by triggering drought stress responses (Erb et al., 2009, 2011b). In the opposite direction, leaf feeding by Spodoptera spp. caterpillars reduces D. virgifera growth and development in a sequence-specific manner in the laboratory and the field (Erb et al., 2011c; Gill et al., 2011). D. virgifera was subsequently demonstrated to avoid leaf-infested plants by detecting and responding to a reduction in root ethylene emissions (Robert et al., 2012). However, it remains unclear whether nonvolatile chemical changes in the roots of leaf-infested maize plants affect D. virgifera foraging and performance. In this study, we explored the hypothesis that leaf infestation by Spodoptera spp. caterpillars triggers a short-range avoidance response in D. virgifera. Through a combination of bioactivity-guided fractionation of root extracts and biochemical and molecular manipulation, we show that systemic changes in soluble phenylpropanoid derivatives trigger a strong avoidance response in D. virgifera. We furthermore demonstrate that this avoidance response is mediated by systemic internal signals and is triggered specifically by herbivory, suggesting that D. virgifera actively and specifically recognizes and avoids leaf-infested plants.     

A specialist root herbivore exploits defensive metabolites to locate nutritious tissues

The most valuable organs of plants are often particularly rich in essential elements, but also very well defended. This creates a dilemma for herbivores that need to maximise energy intake while minimising intoxication. We investigated how the specialist root herbivore Diabrotica virgifera solves this conundrum when feeding on wild and cultivated maize plants. We found that crown roots of maize seedlings were vital for plant development and, in accordance, were rich in nutritious primary metabolites and contained higher amounts of the insecticidal 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOA) and the phenolic compound chlorogenic acid. The generalist herbivores Diabrotica balteata and Spodoptera littoralis were deterred from feeding on crown roots, whereas the specialist D. virgifera preferred and grew best on these tissues. Using a 1,4-benzoxazin-3-one-deficient maize mutant, we found that D. virgifera is resistant to DIMBOA and other 1,4-benzoxazin-3-ones and that it even hijacks these compounds to optimally forage for nutritious roots.     

Herbivore-induced plant volatiles mediate host selection by a root herbivore

In response to herbivore attack, plants mobilize chemical defenses and release distinct bouquets of volatiles. Aboveground herbivores are known to use changes in leaf volatile patterns to make foraging decisions, but it remains unclear whether belowground herbivores also use volatiles to select suitable host plants. We therefore investigated how above- and belowground infestation affects the performance of the root feeder Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, and whether the larvae of this specialized beetle are able to use volatile cues to assess from a distance whether a potential host plant is already under herbivore attack. Diabrotica virgifera larvae showed stronger growth on roots previously attacked by conspecific larvae, but performed more poorly on roots of plants whose leaves had been attacked by larvae of the moth Spodoptera littoralis. Fittingly, D. virgifera larvae were attracted to plants that were infested with conspecifics, whereas they avoided plants that were attacked by S. littoralis. We identified (E)-β-caryophyllene, which is induced by D. virgifera, and ethylene, which is suppressed by S. littoralis, as two signals used by D. virgifera larvae to locate plants that are most suitable for their development. Our study demonstrates that soil-dwelling insects can use herbivore-induced changes in root volatile emissions to identify suitable host plants.     

Thiadiazoles as new inhibitors of diacylglycerol acyltransferase type 1

A novel class of DGAT1 inhibitors containing a thiadiazole core has been discovered. Chemical optimization lead to inhibitors of human DGAT1 with an appropriate ADME profile and that show in vivo activity in target tissues.