ATP binding modulates the nucleic acid affinity of hepatitis C virus helicase

The helicase of hepatitis C virus (HCV) unwinds nucleic acid using the energy of ATP hydrolysis. The ATPase cycle is believed to induce protein conformational changes to drive helicase translocation along the length of the nucleic acid. We have investigated the energetics of nucleic acid binding by HCV helicase to understand how the nucleotide ligation state of the helicase dictates the conformation of its nucleic acid binding site. Because most of the nucleotide ligation states of the helicase are transient due to rapid ATP hydrolysis, several compounds were analyzed to find an efficient unhydrolyzable ATP analog. We found that the beta-gamma methylene/amine analogs of ATP, ATPgammaS, or [AlF4]ADP were not effective in inhibiting the ATPase activity of HCV helicase. On the other hand, [BeF3]ADP was found to be a potent inhibitor of the ATPase activity, and it binds tightly to HCV helicase with a 1:1 stoichiometry. Equilibrium binding studies showed that HCV helicase binds single-stranded nucleic acid with a high affinity in the absence of ATP or in the presence of ADP. Upon binding to the ATP analog, a 100-fold reduction in affinity for ssDNA was observed. The reduction in affinity was also observed in duplex DNA with 3' single-stranded tail and in RNA but not in duplex DNA. The results of this study indicate that the nucleic acid binding site of HCV helicase is allosterically modulated by the ATPase reaction. The binding energy of ATP is used to bring HCV helicase out of a tightly bound state to facilitate translocation, whereas ATP hydrolysis and product release steps promote tight rebinding of the helicase to the nucleic acid. On the basis of these results we propose a Brownian motor model for unidirectional translocation of HCV helicase along the nucleic acid length.     

Evidence that the phytochrome gene family in black cottonwood has one PHYA locus and two PHYB loci but lacks members of the PHYC/F and PHYE subfamilies

The phytochrome photoreceptors play important roles in the photoperiodic control of vegetative bud set, growth cessation, dormancy induction, and cold-hardiness in trees. Interestingly, ecotypic differences in photoperiodic responses are observed in many temperate- zone tree species. Northern and southern ecotypes of black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray), for example, exhibit marked differences in the timing of short-day-induced bud set and growth cessation, and these responses are controlled by phytochrome. Therefore, as a first step toward determining the molecular genetic basis of photoperiodic ecotypes in trees, we characterized the phytochrome gene (PHY) family in black cottonwood. We recovered fragments of one PHYA and two PHYB using PCR-based cloning and by screening a genomic library. Results from Southern analyses confirmed that black cottonwood has one PHYA locus and two PHYB loci, which we arbitrarily designated PHYB1 and PHYB2. Phylogenetic analyses which included PHY from black cottonwood, Arabidopsis thaliana and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) suggest that the PHYB/D duplications in these species occurred independently. When Southern blots were probed with PHYC, PHYE, and PHYE heterologous probes, the strongest bands that we detected were those of black cottonwood PHYA and/or PHYB. These results suggest that black cottonwood lacks members of the PHYC/F and PHYE subfamilies. Although black cottonwood could contain additional PHY that are distantly related to known angiosperm PHY, our results imply that the PHY family of black cottonwood is less complex than that of other well-characterized dicot species such as Arabidopsis and tomato. Based on Southern analyses of five black cottonwood genotypes representing three photoperiodic ecotypes, substantial polymorphism was detected for at least one of the PHYB loci but not for the PHYA locus. The novel character of the PHY family in black cottonwood, as well as the differences in polymorphism we observed between the PHYA and PHYB subfamilies, indicates that a number of fundamental macro- and microevolutionary questions remain to be answered about the PHY family in dicots.