About Bullockia gen. nov., Trichomycterus mendozensis n. sp. and revision of the family Trichomycteridae (Pisces,Siluriformes)

A new genus of the family Trichomycteridae, Bullockia, and a new species of Trichomycterus are described. Bullockia gen. nov. is a monospecific and relict genus in the freshwaters of Chile. Trichomycterus mendozensis n. sp. is a freshwater relict from Argentina. Preliminary diagnoses of the subfamilies Pygidiinae and Nematogenyinae and the genera Trichomycterus, Hatcheria and Nematogenys are given.     

Integrating multiple lines of evidence to better understand the evolutionary divergence of humpback dolphins along their entire distribution range: a new dolphin species in Australian waters?

The conservation of humpback dolphins, distributed in coastal waters of the Indo‐West Pacific and eastern Atlantic Oceans, has been hindered by a lack of understanding about the number of species in the genus (Sousa) and their population structure. To address this issue, we present a combined analysis of genetic and morphologic data collected from beach‐cast, remote‐biopsied and museum specimens from throughout the known Sousa range. We extracted genetic sequence data from 235 samples from extant populations and explored the mitochondrial control region and four nuclear introns through phylogenetic, population‐level and population aggregation frameworks. In addition, 180 cranial specimens from the same geographical regions allowed comparisons of 24 morphological characters through multivariate analyses. The genetic and morphological data showed significant and concordant patterns of geographical segregation, which are typical for the kind of demographic isolation displayed by species units, across the Sousa genus distribution range. Based on our combined genetic and morphological analyses, there is convincing evidence for at least four species within the genus (S. teuszii in the Atlantic off West Africa, S. plumbea in the central and western Indian Ocean, S. chinensis in the eastern Indian and West Pacific Oceans, and a new as‐yet‐unnamed species off northern Australia).     

Common and divergent functions of Beclin 1 and Beclin 2

In a recent paper published in Cell, He and colleagues reported the identification and functional characterization of Beclin 2, a mammal-specific homolog of the evolutionarily conserved autophagy-regulatory and oncosuppressive factor Beclin 1. In spite of a non-negligible degree of sequence identity, Beclin 1 and Beclin 2 differ from each other in multiple aspects, including their functional profile as well as the genomic organization of the respective loci.Originally identified as a BCL-2-interacting partner capable of protecting mice from viral encephalitis¹, Beclin 1 — the mammalian ortholog of yeast Atg6 — is nowadays well known as a core component of the class III phosphoinosite-3-kinase (PI3K) enzymatic complex that initiates the formation of autophagosomes in the course of macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy)². Presumably owing to the critical function of autophagy in embryonic development, mice lacking both copies of the Beclin 1-coding gene (Becn1) die early during embryogenesis. Moreover, Becn1^+/− mice suffer from a high incidence of spontaneous tumors, indicating that Beclin 1 acts as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor³. At least in part, this reflects the central role that autophagy plays in the maintenance of intracellular homeostasis. Indeed, baseline levels of autophagy mediate the removal of various cytoplasmic entities that might favor oncogenesis, including damaged mitochondria and protein aggregates⁴. Conversely, established neoplasms often harness the cytoprotective functions of autophagy to their own benefit². The pathophysiological relevance of autophagy is not limited to cancer, but extends to a large panel of human diseases, including neurodegenerative, cardiovascular and infectious conditions⁵. Thus, during the last decade autophagy-regulatory signaling pathways have been intensively investigated.Until now, Beclin 1 was considered as the only Beclin encoded by the mammalian genome, sharing some degree of structural homology with so-called “BH3-only” proteins, pro-apoptotic members of the BCL-2 family that are involved in the activation of cell death in response to stress⁶. In a recent paper published in Cell, the research group led by Beth Levine⁷ identified a human and a mouse protein sharing 57% and 44% sequence identity with human and mouse Beclin 1, respectively, de facto unveiling the existence of an additional, mammal-specific ortholog of Atg6, Beclin 2. The mouse Beclin 2 mRNA was detected in multiple organs including the brain, skeletal muscle, placenta, thymus and uterus, as was the human protein in both fetal and adult brain tissues. These data demonstrate that the current classification of mouse and human Beclin 2-encoding genes (i.e., {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"NG_022940","term_id":"298676453","term_text":"NG_022940"}}NG_022940 and {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"NG_028451","term_id":"331028236","term_text":"NG_028451"}}NG_028451) as pseudogenes is incorrect.The knockdown of Beclin 2 reduced several manifestations of basal or starvation-induced autophagy in cultured mammalian cells, including the degradation of the autophagic substrate p62, the aggregation of a fluorescent form of LC3 into cytoplasmic dots and the lipidation of endogenous LC3. All such effects, which were not due to an increased autophagosomal turnover (as verified in the presence of the lysosomal inhibitor bafilomycin A1), could be rescued upon the transgene-driven expression of a non-interferable Beclin 2 variant. Thus, similar to Beclin 1, Beclin 2 regulates autophagy⁷. In fact, Beclin 2 turned out to physically interact with several (but not all) components of the class III PI3K complex organized around Beclin 1, including the catalytic subunit VPS34 as well as the regulatory factors ATG14, AMBRA1 and UVRAG, but not RUBICON (Figure 1A). Beclin 2 also appeared to share with Beclin 1 the ability to bind BCL-2, although only the latter gets dissociated from such an interaction in the course of stress-induced autophagy^7,8. As the greatest divergence between mammalian Beclins involves their N terminus, He and colleagues employed the N-terminal domain of Beclin 2 as a bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen, and identified G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-associated sorting protein 1 (GASP1) as a Beclin 2-specific interactor. Thus, similar to GASP1 (but not to Beclin 1), Beclin 2 was required for the agonist-induced lysosomal degradation of a subset of GPCRs including opioid receptor δ1 (DOR) and cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1R). Importantly, such an activity, but not the capacity of Beclin 2 to regulate autophagic responses, appears to rely on the physical interaction between Beclin 2 and GASP1.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Common and divergent functions of mammalian Beclins. Specificity of the main interactors (A) and functions (B) ascribed to mammalian Beclin 1 and Beclin 2 to date. GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase.To obtain insights into the physiological functions of Beclin 2, He and colleagues attempted to generate Becn2^−/− mice, finding that these animals survived embryonic and early post-natal development at sub-Mendelian rates (approximately 4%). Not only Becn2^+/− and Becn2^−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts, but also the brain of Becn2^+/− animals exhibited significant autophagic defects, corroborating the role of Beclin 2 in the regulation of autophagy in vivo. Moreover, these genotypes were associated with increased basal levels of multiple GPCRs, including CB1R and dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2)⁷. In line with the notion that increased CB1R signaling accrues food intake and hence favors obesity and insulin resistance, while pharmacological or genetic CB1R inhibition has opposite effects⁹, Becn2^+/− mice accumulated more weight than their wild-type littermates in response to a standard (as well as to a high-fat) diet. At odds with their Becn1^+/− counterparts, Becn2^+/− mice also exhibited impaired glucose tolerance and decreased insulin sensitivity, two effects that could be reverted by a chemical CB1R antagonist⁷. Taken together, these data demonstrate that besides regulating autophagy, Beclin 2 plays a unique role in glucose metabolism.Beclin 1 is known to regulate various processes other than autophagy, including vacuolar protein sorting and the degradation of specific growth factor receptors¹⁰. Thus, in spite of 44% - 57% sequence identity, the two mammalian Beclins described to date are relatively different from each other, exhibiting functional profiles that overlap to a limited degree (Figure 1B). Interestingly, He and colleagues have previously shown that defects in stimulus-induced autophagy (including those introduced by the Becn1^+/− genotype) are coupled to decreased endurance and altered glucose metabolism during acute exercise, as well as with an impaired capacity of training to protect mice against diet-induced glucose intolerance⁸. Part of these phenomena were shown to reflect defects in the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-dependent exposure of glucose transporters on the plasma membrane of skeletal muscle cells. It is therefore tempting to speculate that the metabolic phenotype of Becn2^+/− may in part originate from peripheral defects in glucose handling linked to autophagy. Thus, although the force driving the divergence of mammalian Beclins remains to be elucidated, it may reflect the need for an integrated regulation of central and peripheral mechanisms of metabolic homeostasis. Further studies are required to address this hypothesis.     

Life Cycle Impact Assessment—where we are, trends, and next steps: a late report from a UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative workshop and a few updates from recent developments

Purpose

The paper provides a late report from the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP)/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) Life Cycle Initiative workshop “Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA)—where we are, trends, and next steps;” it embeds this report into recent development with regard to the envisaged development of global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators and related methodologies.

Methods

The document is the output of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative’s workshop on “Life Cycle Impact Assessment—where we are, trends, and next steps.” The presentations and discussions held during the workshop reviewed the first two phases of the Life Cycle Initiative and provided an overview of current LCIA activities being conducted by the Initiative, governments and academia, as well as corporate approaches. The outcomes of the workshop are reflected in light of the implementation of the strategy for Phase 3 of the Life Cycle Initiative.

Results

The range of views provided during the workshop indicated different user needs, with regards to, amongst other things, the required complexity of the LCIA methodology, associated costs, and the selection of LCIA categories depending on environmental priorities. The workshop’s results signified a number of potential focus areas for Phase 3 of the Initiative, including capacity building efforts concerning LCIA in developing countries and emerging economies, the preparation of training materials on LCIA, the production of global guidance on LCIA, and the potential development of a broader sustainability indicators framework.

Conclusions

These suggestions have been taken into account in the strategy for Phase 3 of the Life Cycle Initiative in two flagship projects, one on global capability development on life cycle approaches and the other on global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators. In the context of the latter project, first activities are being organized and planned. Moreover, UNEP has included the recommendations in its Rio + 20 Voluntary Commitments: UNEP and SETAC through the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative commit to facilitate improved access to good quality life cycle data and databases as well as expanded use of key environmental indicators that allows the measurement and monitoring of progress towards the environmental sustainability of selected product chains.     

A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20

Purpose

To contribute to the upcoming United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in 2012 by introducing a life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) and showing how it can play a crucial role in moving towards sustainable consumption and production. The publication, titled Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment, and published by the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative aims to show how three life cycle techniques—(environmental) LCA, S-LCA and LCC—can be combined as part of an over-arching LCSA.

Methods

The method was demonstrated by evaluating the characteristics of each phase for each life cycle technique. In defining the goal and scope of an LCSA, for example, different aspects should be taken into account to establish the aim of the study as well as the functional unit, system boundaries, impact category and allocation. Then, the data to be collected for the life cycle sustainability inventory can be either in a unit process or on an organisational level. They can also be quantitative or qualitative. Life cycle sustainability impact assessment should consider the relevance of the impacts as well as the perspective of stakeholders. The interpretation should not add up the results, but rather evaluate them jointly. In order to clarify the approach, a case study is presented to evaluate three types of marble according to the proposed method.

Results and discussion

The authors have identified that while LCSA is feasible, following areas need more development: data production and acquisition, methodological development, discussion about LCSA criteria (e.g. cutoff rules), definitions and formats of communication and dissemination of LCSA results and the expansion of research and applications combining (environmental) LCA, LCC and S-LCA. The authors also indicate that it is necessary to develop more examples and cases to improve user capacity to analyse the larger picture and therefore address the three dimensions or pillars of sustainability in a systematic way. Software and database providers are called for in order to facilitate user-friendly and accessible tools to promote LCSAs.

Conclusions

The application demonstrated that, although methodological improvements are still needed, important steps towards an overarching sustainability assessment have been accomplished. LCSA is possible and should be pursued; however, more efforts should be made to improve the technique and facilitate the studies in order to contribute to a greener economy.     

Inhibiting PHGDH with NCT-503 reroutes glucose-derived carbons into the TCA cycle,independently of its on-target effect

The small-molecule inhibitor of phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, NCT-503, reduces incorporation of glucose-derived carbons into serine in vitro. Here we describe an off-target effect of NCT-503 in neuroblastoma cell lines expressing divergent phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH) levels and single-cell clones with CRISPR-Cas9-directed PHGDH knockout or their respective wildtype controls. NCT-503 treatment strongly reduced synthesis of glucose-derived citrate in all cell models investigated compared to the inactive drug control and independent of PHGDH expression level. Incorporation of glucose-derived carbons entering the TCA cycle via pyruvate carboxylase was enhanced by NCT-503 treatment. The activity of citrate synthase was not altered by NCT-503 treatment. We also detected no change in the thermal stabilisation of citrate synthase in cellular thermal shift assays from NCT-503-treated cells. Thus, the direct cause of the observed off-target effect remains enigmatic. Our findings highlight off-target potential within a metabolic assessment of carbon usage in cells treated with the small-molecule inhibitor, NCT-503.     

SSF of steam-pretreated wheat straw with the addition of saccharified or fermented wheat meal in integrated bioethanol production

Background

Integration of second-generation (2G) bioethanol production with existing first-generation (1G) production may facilitate commercial production of ethanol from cellulosic material. Since 2G hydrolysates have a low sugar concentration and 1G streams often have to be diluted prior to fermentation, mixing of streams is beneficial. Improved ethanol concentrations in the 2G production process lowers energy demand in distillation, improves overall energy efficiency and thus lower production cost. There is also a potential to reach higher ethanol yields, which is required in economically feasible ethanol production. Integrated process scenarios with addition of saccharified wheat meal (SWM) or fermented wheat meal (FWM) were investigated in simultaneous saccharification and (co-)fermentation (SSF or SSCF) of steam-pretreated wheat straw, while the possibility of recovering the valuable protein-rich fibre residue from the wheat was also studied.

Results

The addition of SWM to SSF of steam-pretreated wheat straw, using commercially used dried baker’s yeast, S. cerevisiae, resulted in ethanol concentrations of about 60 g/L, equivalent to ethanol yields of about 90% of the theoretical. The addition of FWM in batch mode SSF was toxic to baker’s yeast, due to the ethanol content of FWM, resulting in a very low yield and high accumulation of glucose. The addition of FWM in fed-batch mode still caused a slight accumulation of glucose, but the ethanol concentration was fairly high, 51.2 g/L, corresponding to an ethanol yield of 90%, based on the amount of glucose added.In batch mode of SSCF using the xylose-fermenting, genetically modified S. cerevisiae strain KE6-12, no improvement was observed in ethanol yield or concentration, compared with baker’s yeast, despite the increased xylose utilization, probably due to the considerable increase in glycerol production. A slight increase in xylose consumption was seen when glucose from SWM was fed at a low feed rate, after 48 hours, compared with batch SSCF. However, the ethanol yield and concentration remained in the same range as in batch mode.

Conclusion

Ethanol concentrations of about 6% (w/v) were obtained, which will result in a significant reduction in the cost of downstream processing, compared with SSF of the lignocellulosic substrate alone. As an additional benefit, it is also possible to recover the protein-rich residue from the SWM in the process configurations presented, providing a valuable co-product.

     

Origins and Evolution of the Etruscans’ mtDNA

The Etruscan culture is documented in Etruria, Central Italy, from the 8^th to the 1^st century BC. For more than 2,000 years there has been disagreement on the Etruscans’ biological origins, whether local or in Anatolia. Genetic affinities with both Tuscan and Anatolian populations have been reported, but so far all attempts have failed to fit the Etruscans’ and modern populations in the same genealogy. We extracted and typed the hypervariable region of mitochondrial DNA of 14 individuals buried in two Etruscan necropoleis, analyzing them along with other Etruscan and Medieval samples, and 4,910 contemporary individuals from the Mediterranean basin. Comparing ancient (30 Etruscans, 27 Medieval individuals) and modern DNA sequences (370 Tuscans), with the results of millions of computer simulations, we show that the Etruscans can be considered ancestral, with a high degree of confidence, to the current inhabitants of Casentino and Volterra, but not to the general contemporary population of the former Etruscan homeland. By further considering two Anatolian samples (35 and 123 individuals) we could estimate that the genetic links between Tuscany and Anatolia date back to at least 5,000 years ago, strongly suggesting that the Etruscan culture developed locally, and not as an immediate consequence of immigration from the Eastern Mediterranean shores.