How amyloplasts,water deficit and root tropisms interact?

Hydrotropism, the differential growth of plant roots directed by a moisture gradient, is a long recognized, but not well-understood plant behavior. Hydrotropism has been characterized in the model plant Arabidopsis. Previously, it was postulated that roots subjected to water stress are capable of undergo water-directed tropic growth independent of the gravity vector because of the loss of the starch granules in root cap columella cells and hence the loss of the early steps in gravitropic signaling. We have recently proposed that starch degradation in these cells during hydrostimulation sustain osmotic stress and root growth for carrying out hydrotropism instead of reducing gravity responsiveness. In addition, we also proposed that abscisic acid (ABA) and water deficit are critical regulators of root gravitropism and hydrotropism, and thus mediate the interacting mechanism between these two tropisms. Our conclusions are based upon experiments performed with the no hydrotropic response (nhr1) mutant of Arabidopsis, which lacks a hydrotropic response and shows a stronger gravitropic response than that of wild type (WT) in a medium with an osmotic gradient.Key words: starch, water deficit, auxin, abscisic acid, gravitropism, hydrotropismRoots of land plants sense and respond to different stimuli, some of which are fixed in direction and intensity (i.e., gravity) while other vary in time, space, direction and intensity (i.e., obstacles and moisture gradients). Directed growth of roots in relation to a gradient in moisture is called hydrotropism and begins in the root cap with the sensing of the moisture gradient. However, since gravity is an omnipresent accompaniment of Earthly life and many living process have evolved with it as a background constant, it is not surprising that root hydrotropism interacts with gravitropism.¹ The hydrotropic response in Arabidopsis, compare with other plants such as pea and cucumber^2,3 is readily observed even in the presence of gravity.^4,5 When Arabidopsis roots are subjected to a water gradient, such that the source of water is placed 180° opposed to the gravity vector, the roots will grow upwards, displaying positive hydrotropism. Therefore, it has been feasible to isolate so far two Arabidopsis mutants affected in their hydrotropic response.^5,6 Analysis of these mutants reveals new insights of the mechanism of hydrotropism. For one hand, the no hydrotropic response (nhr1) mutant lacks a hydrotropic response, and shows a stronger gravitropic response than that of wt and a modified wavy growth response in a medium with an osmotic gradient.^5,7 On the other hand, the mizu-kussei1 (miz1) mutant did not exhibit hydrotropism and showed regular gravitropism.⁶ Hence, the root hydrotropic response is both linked and unlinked from the gravitropic one. Nonetheless, miz1 roots also showed a reduced phototropism and a modified wavy growth response. This indicates that both MIZ1 and NHR1 are not exclusive components of the mechanism for hydrotropism and supports the notion that the root cap has assessment mechanisms that integrate many different environmental influences to produce a final integrated response.⁸ Thus, the physiological phenomena distinctively displayed by roots in order to forage resources from the environment are the result of integrated responses that resulted from many environmental influences sensed in the root cap.In the course of studying how gravity and water availability affected the perception and assessment of each other in root cap cells that generated the final root tropic response, we found that ABA is a critical regulator of the signal transduction mechanism that integrated these two-root tropisms.⁷ For this, we analyzed the long-term hydrotropic response of Arabidopsis roots in an osmotic gradient system. ABA, locally applied to seeds or root tips of nhr1, significantly increased root downward growth in a medium with an osmotic gradient (root length of nhr1 seedlings grown in this medium were on average 12.5 mm and plus 10 µM ABA were 25.1 mm). On the other hand, WT roots germinated and treated locally with ABA in this system were strongly gravitropic, albeit they had almost no starch in amyloplasts of root cap columella cells. Hydrotropically stimulated nhr1 roots, with or without ABA, maintained starch in amyloplastas, as opposed to those of WT. Therefore, the near-absence (WT) or abundant presence (nhr1) of starch granules does not affect the extent of downward gravitropism of roots in an osmotic gradient medium. Starch degradation in the wt might participate in osmoregulation by which root cells maintain turgor and consequently carry out hydrotropism, instead of reducing gravity responsiveness. In fact, it was just recently published that salt-induced rapid degradation of starch in amyloplasts is not likely the main reason for a negative gravitropic response seen under salt stress, because sos mutant roots of Arabidopsis showed negative gravitropic growth without any apparent rapid digestion of starch granules.⁹ Additionally, the stems of overwintering tubers of Potamogeton pectinatus are capable of elongating much faster in the absence than in the presence of oxygen for up to 14 days and its stems has an enhanced capacity for gravitropic movements in completely anoxic conditions.¹⁰ These authors hypothesized that ABA and starch degradation in the starchy tuber sustained stem cell elongation and cell division as well as differential growth required for the gravitropic response in these aquatic plants. These data taken together suggest that in conditions of anoxia, or water stress, ABA and degradation of starch play a critical role in the ability to survive relatively prolonged periods of unfavorable growth conditions. These players are critical when water or minerals are scarce since they regulate the enhancement of root downward growth. However, since roots can trail humidity gradients in soil, they can modulate their branching patterns (architecture) and thus respond to hydrotropism once a water-rich patch is found. Then the response of plants to gravity is principally one of nutrition (shoots to light, roots to mineral and water) and consequently must be regulated according to the long- and short-term environmental variables that occur during the development of the plant.Differential growth that occurs during the gravitropic and phototropic response has been explained according to the Cholodny-Went hypothesis, which states that the lateral transport of auxin across stimulated plant tissues is responsible for the curvature response.¹¹ Analysis of hydrotropism in some Arabidopsis agravitropic auxin transport mutants has demonstrated that these mutations do not influence their hydrotropic response.⁴ Furthermore, current pharmacological studies using inhibitors also indicated that both auxin influx and efflux are not required for hydrotropic response whereas auxin response is necessary for it.¹² These authors suggested a novel mechanism for auxin in root hydrotropism. Here, we analyzed whether asymmetric auxin distribution takes place across hydrotropically-stimulated roots using transgenic plants carrying a responsive auxin promoter (DR5) driving the expression of β-glucuronidase (GUS) or green fluorescent protein (GFP)^13,14 in wt and nhr1 backgrounds. Wt and nhr1 roots hydrotropically stimulated in a system with air moisture gradient⁵ showed no asymmetric expression of the DR5:: GUS or DR5::GFP (Fig. 1A and B). Nonetheless, nhr1 roots showed a substantial decrease in the signal driven by the DR5::GUS and GFP reporters in humidity saturated conditions (Fig. 1A, part b and B, part b), which might indicate that auxin-induced gene expression in the root cap was inhibited. It remains to be determined the significance of this inhibition in the no hydrotropic response phenotype displayed by nhr1 roots. Determination of the DR5::GUS expression in wt and nhr1 roots growing in an osmotic gradient medium for testing long-term hydrotropism revealed that the GUS signal was to some extent diminished in both wt or in nhr1 roots (Fig. 2C and D) compared to those roots growing in normal medium (Fig. 2A and B). An inhibitor of auxin response reduced hydrotropism,¹² and also inhibited auxin-dependent DR5::GUS expression.¹⁵ However, a decrease of DR5::GUS in wt root tips was not an impediment for developing an hydrotropic response. On the other hand, nhr1 roots also showed a decrease of DR5::GUS expression (Fig. 2B and D) and a complete absence of DR5::GFP (data not shown), which did not influence the extent of downward root gravitropism in water deficit conditions. Therefore, it is difficult to assign a role of auxin-induce gene expression in hydrotropism and further studies are required in order to unravel this issue. Furthermore, it needs to be resolved whether these expression studies oppose the idea that gradients in auxin precede differential growth in response to humidity gradients.Open in a separate windowFigure 1DR5:: GUS (A) and DR5::GFP (B) activity in the wild type NHR1 and nhr1 backgrounds. (A) Root tips hydrostimulated in a system with air moisture gradient (C and D) or grown in a saturated water conditions (A and B) stained with 1 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-glucuronic (X-Gluc) acid buffer under the same conditions for 80 min. (B) Root tips hydrostimulated as in (A) (C and D) or grown in a saturated water conditions (A and B) whose green fluorescent signal was visualized by confocal microscopy. Shown are images selected from at least 45 representative root tips. Bar = 29 µm.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Expression of DR5::GUS in wild type NHR1 and nhr1 backgrounds. Roots were hydrotropically stimulated for 8 days in a medium with an osmotic gradient (C and D) or grown in normal medium (A and B) and stained with X-Gluc acid buffer under the same conditions for 80 min. Shown are images selected from at least 50 representative root tips. Bar = 25 µm.Our studies⁷ revealed that ABA is a critical regulator of both root gravitropism and hydrotropism in water deficit conditions, and that the role of auxin under these conditions seems to differ from those observed in several studies thus far published on gravitropism made under well-water conditions. The molecular characterization of NHR1 and from other nhr-like mutants already isolated in our lab will clarify the mechanisms involved in this fascinating tropism.¹⁶     

Temporal dynamics and genetic diversity of chemotactic‐competent microbial populations in the rhizosphere

The contribution of chemotaxis to the competitive colonization of the rhizosphere for the vast majority of the soil community is unknown. We have developed and applied a molecular diagnostic tool, based on a gene encoding the central regulator of bacterial chemotaxis (cheA), to characterize and temporally track specific populations of native microbes with chemotaxis potential that are present in soil exposed to two rhizospheres: wheat and cowpea. The data show that the chemotactic‐competent communities present in the rhizospheres of the two plants are distinct and less diverse than the bulk soil, indicating the development of unique microbial communities. Consistent with the supposition that selection and recruitment of specific soil microbes takes place in the rhizosphere, the dynamics of specific cheA phylotypes provides support for the hypothesis that chemotaxis provides a competitive advantage to some soil microbes. This is the first study to examine and profile the genetic diversity of chemotaxis genes in natural populations. As such, it illustrates our limited understanding of microbial chemotaxis for the majority of soil microbes. It also highlights the value of a culture‐independent approach for examining chemotaxis populations in order to build empirical lines of evidence for its role in structuring of microbial assemblages.     

The molecular phylogenetics of the genus Oligoryzomys (Rodentia: Cricetidae) clarifies rodent host–hantavirus associations

Several species of the genus Oligoryzomys are natural hosts of different hantavirus genotypes affecting humans. The systematics of the genus is confusing, which complicates the identification of the rodent host and hence the potential endemic areas of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. In this study, we analyse molecular data to infer phylogenetic relationships among Central and South American specimens of Oligoryzomys, and compare our results with previously published data on karyotypic, geographic distribution and host–virus associations to solve contradictory taxonomic reports. We identified 25 clades, each one corresponding to a different putative species. The phylogenetic trees show that Oligoryzomys longicaudatus is strongly related to the Oligoryzomys flavescens complex, which comprises four clades; Oligoryzomys nigripes is related to Oligoryzomys stramineus, Oligoryzomys vegetus is related to Oligoryzomys fulvescens from Central America, and Oligoryzomys brendae is the sister species of Oligoryzomys aff. destructor. We identified the following rodent host–hantavirus genotype relationships: O. longicaudatus–Andes; O. flavescens ‘West'–Bermejo; O. flavescens ‘East'–Lechiguanas; O. nigripes–Juquitiba; Oligoryzomys microtis–Rio Mamore and Rio Mamore‐3; Oligoryzomys chacoensis–Oran; Oligoryzomys costaricencis–Choclo; Oligoryzomys delicatus–Maporal; Oligoryzomys utiaritensis–Castelo dos Sonhos; Oligoryzomys sp. RT2012–Rio Mamore‐4; Oligoryzomys sp. (and not Oligoryzomys fornesi)–Anajatuba. This work, besides contributing to the development of prevention programmes for hantavirus epidemiology in Latin America, represents a comprehensive update of the systematics of the genus Oligoryzomys. © 2014 The Linnean Society of London     

Three maize root-specific genes are not correctly expressed in regenerated caps in the absence of the quiescent center

The quiescent center is viewed as an architectural template in the root apical meristem of all angiosperm and gymnosperm root tips. In roots of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., the quiescent center inhibits differentiation of contacting initial cells and maintains the surrounding initial cells as stem cells. Here, the role of the quiescent center in the development of the maize (Zea mays L.) root cap has been further explored. Three maize root-specific genes were identified. Two of these were exclusively expressed in the root cap and one of them encoded a GDP-mannose-4,6-dehydratase. Most likely these two genes are structural, tissue-specific markers of the cap. The third gene, a putative glycine-rich cell wall protein, was expressed in the cap and in the root epidermis and, conceivably is a positional marker of the cap. Microsurgical and molecular data indicate that the quiescent center and cap initials may regulate the positional and structural expression of these genes in the cap and thereby control root cap development. Received: 22 September 1999 / Accepted: 9 November 1999     

Gynoecium structure in Sapindales and a case study of Trichilia pallens (Meliaceae)

Journal of Plant Research - Sapindales is a monophyletic order within the malvid clade of rosids. It represents an interesting group to address questions on floral structure and evolution due to a...     

Evidence for Specific Polypeptide Chain Folding in Myelin Basic Protein from Reactions Between Fragments of the Protein and Monoclonal Antibodies

The specificities of two monoclonal IgM antibodies (18.25 and 21.14.2) evoked in mice with guinea pig myelin basic protein were examined and interpreted in terms of a specific folding of the protein's polypeptide chain. Studies with guinea pig and rabbit myelin basic protein fragments showed that a region encompassing the central Phe-Phe (87-88) sequence is obligatory, but not sufficient, for reactivity with antibody 18.25. Appreciable reactivity was observed for rabbit peptides 22-95 and 45-151, and lower, but significant, reactivity was shown by peptide 32-95. Only very weak reactivity was seen with peptide 44-95. No reactivity was observed with peptide 1-95 after its lysine residues were acetylated, acetamidinated, or guanidinated. These results have been interpreted in terms of a polypeptide chain folding that creates an epitope within sequence Val-Val-His-Phe-Phe-Lys-Asn-Ile-Val (84-92). The specific conformation of this epitope, which includes probably the Lys-89 and possibly the Asn-90 and Val-92 side chains, could be formed by the association of sequence 84-92 with either sequence Ile-Leu-Asp-Ser-Ile-Gly-Arg-Phe-Phe (37-45) or with sequence Val-Leu-Ser-Arg-Phe (108-112) to form beta-sheet structures essentially identical with those that appear to be present in the intact BP [Martenson R.E.J. Neurochem. 46, 1612-1622 (1986)]. The second monoclonal antibody, no. 21.14.2, reacts only with guinea pig myelin basic protein and fragments containing the species-restricted sequence Arg-Ala-Asp-Tyr-Lys-Ser-Lys (129-135).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)