Mps1 phosphorylates Borealin to control Aurora B activity and chromosome alignment

Maintenance of chromosomal stability relies on coordination between various processes that are critical for proper chromosome segregation in mitosis. Here we show that monopolar spindle 1 (Mps1) kinase, which is essential for the mitotic checkpoint, also controls correction of improper chromosome attachments. We report that Borealin/DasraB, a member of the complex that regulates the Aurora B kinase, is directly phosphorylated by Mps1 on residues that are crucial for Aurora B activity and chromosome alignment. As a result, cells lacking Mps1 kinase activity fail to efficiently align chromosomes due to impaired Aurora B function at centromeres, leaving improper attachments uncorrected. Strikingly, Borealin/DasraB bearing phosphomimetic mutations restores Aurora B activity and alignment in Mps1-depleted cells. Mps1 thus coordinates attachment error correction and checkpoint signaling, two crucial responses to unproductive chromosome attachments.     

Connexin 43 hemichannels contribute to cytoplasmic Ca2+ oscillations by providing a bimodal Ca2+-dependent Ca2+ entry pathway

Many cellular functions are driven by changes in the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) that are highly organized in time and space. Ca(2+) oscillations are particularly important in this respect and are based on positive and negative [Ca(2+)](i) feedback on inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (InsP(3)Rs). Connexin hemichannels are Ca(2+)-permeable plasma membrane channels that are also controlled by [Ca(2+)](i). We aimed to investigate how hemichannels may contribute to Ca(2+) oscillations. Madin-Darby canine kidney cells expressing connexin-32 (Cx32) and Cx43 were exposed to bradykinin (BK) or ATP to induce Ca(2+) oscillations. BK-induced oscillations were rapidly (minutes) and reversibly inhibited by the connexin-mimetic peptides (32)Gap27/(43)Gap26, whereas ATP-induced oscillations were unaffected. Furthermore, these peptides inhibited the BK-triggered release of calcein, a hemichannel-permeable dye. BK-induced oscillations, but not those induced by ATP, were dependent on extracellular Ca(2+). Alleviating the negative feedback of [Ca(2+)](i) on InsP(3)Rs using cytochrome c inhibited BK- and ATP-induced oscillations. Cx32 and Cx43 hemichannels are activated by <500 nm [Ca(2+)](i) but inhibited by higher concentrations and CT9 peptide (last 9 amino acids of the Cx43 C terminus) removes this high [Ca(2+)](i) inhibition. Unlike interfering with the bell-shaped dependence of InsP(3)Rs to [Ca(2+)](i), CT9 peptide prevented BK-induced oscillations but not those triggered by ATP. Collectively, these data indicate that connexin hemichannels contribute to BK-induced oscillations by allowing Ca(2+) entry during the rising phase of the Ca(2+) spikes and by providing an OFF mechanism during the falling phase of the spikes. Hemichannels were not sufficient to ignite oscillations by themselves; however, their contribution was crucial as hemichannel inhibition stopped the oscillations.     

Type I and Type II error under random-effects misspecification in generalized linear mixed models

Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) have become a frequently used tool for the analysis of non-Gaussian longitudinal data. Estimation is based on maximum likelihood theory, which assumes that the underlying probability model is correctly specified. Recent research is showing that the results obtained from these models are not always robust against departures from the assumptions on which these models are based. In the present work we have used simulations with a logistic random-intercept model to study the impact of misspecifying the random-effects distribution on the type I and II errors of the tests for the mean structure in GLMMs. We found that the misspecification can either increase or decrease the power of the tests, depending on the shape of the underlying random-effects distribution, and it can considerably inflate the type I error rate. Additionally, we have found a theoretical result which states that whenever a subset of fixed-effects parameters, not included in the random-effects structure equals zero, the corresponding maximum likelihood estimator will consistently estimate zero. This implies that under certain conditions a significant effect could be considered as a reliable result, even if the random-effects distribution is misspecified.     

Structural Determinants at the Interface of the ARC2 and Leucine-Rich Repeat Domains Control the Activation of the Plant Immune Receptors Rx1 and Gpa2

Many plant and animal immune receptors have a modular nucleotide-binding-leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) architecture in which a nucleotide-binding switch domain, NB-ARC, is tethered to a LRR sensor domain. The cooperation between the switch and sensor domains, which regulates the activation of these proteins, is poorly understood. Here, we report structural determinants governing the interaction between the NB-ARC and LRR in the highly homologous plant immune receptors Gpa2 and Rx1, which recognize the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida and Potato virus X, respectively. Systematic shuffling of polymorphic sites between Gpa2 and Rx1 showed that a minimal region in the ARC2 and N-terminal repeats of the LRR domain coordinate the activation state of the protein. We identified two closely spaced amino acid residues in this region of the ARC2 (positions 401 and 403) that distinguish between autoactivation and effector-triggered activation. Furthermore, a highly acidic loop region in the ARC2 domain and basic patches in the N-terminal end of the LRR domain were demonstrated to be required for the physical interaction between the ARC2 and LRR. The NB-ARC and LRR domains dissociate upon effector-dependent activation, and the complementary-charged regions are predicted to mediate a fast reassociation, enabling multiple rounds of activation. Finally, we present a mechanistic model showing how the ARC2, NB, and N-terminal half of the LRR form a clamp, which regulates the dissociation and reassociation of the switch and sensor domains in NB-LRR proteins.Resistance (R) proteins play a central role in the recognition-based immune system of plants. Unlike vertebrates, plants lack an adaptive immune system with highly specialized immune cells. Instead, they rely on an innate immune system in which each cell is autonomous. Two types of immune receptors can be distinguished in plants, pathogen-associated molecular patterns recognition receptors that detect conserved molecular patterns in plant pathogens and intracellular R proteins that recognize specific effectors employed by pathogens as modifiers of host metabolism or defense mechanisms (Jones and Dangl, 2006). Effector-triggered activation of R proteins leads to an array of protective responses, often culminating in programmed cell death at the site of infection (Greenberg and Yao, 2004), thereby preventing further ingress of the pathogen. Pathogens have evolved mechanisms to evade recognition by R proteins and to regain their virulence (Dodds and Rathjen, 2010). This continuous coevolutionary process between host and pathogen has resulted in a reservoir of highly diverse R proteins in plants, enabling them to counteract a wide range of pathogens and pests.The most common class of R proteins consists of nucleotide-binding (NB)-leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins with a tripartite domain architecture, which roughly corresponds to an N-terminal response domain (a coiled coil [CC] or Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor [TIR] domain) involved in downstream signaling, a central molecular switch domain (the NB domain present in the mammalian apoptosis regulator Apaf1, plant R proteins, and the Caenorhabditis elegans apoptosis regulator CED4 [NB-ARC]), and a C-terminal sensor domain (the LRR domain). The NB-ARC domain is an extended nucleotide-binding domain that plant immune receptors share with metazoan apoptosis regulators and immune receptors such as Apaf1, CED4, and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD-like) receptors (NLRs) and belongs to the STAND (signal transduction ATPases with numerous domains) family of nucleoside triphosphatase domains (van der Biezen and Jones, 1998; Leipe et al., 2004; Albrecht and Takken, 2006; Maekawa et al., 2011b). The overall modular architecture of metazoan STAND nucleoside triphosphatase is similar to that of NB-LRR plant immune receptors, but the domains flanking the NB-ARC domain often differ. In NLRs, for example, several N-terminal domains can be found, including caspase-recruiting domains and Pyrin domains (Proell et al., 2008). In the mammalian protein Apaf1, the sensor involved in cytochrome c detection consists of C-terminal WD40 repeats (Zou et al., 1997).In plant NB-LRR resistance proteins, the recognition of a pathogen effector via the LRR domain is thought to switch the conformation of the protein from a closed, autoinhibited “off” state into an open, active “on” state (Lukasik and Takken, 2009). The activation of NB-LRR proteins is most likely a multistep process in which the NB-ARC domain plays a central role. The three subdomains of the NB-ARC, the NB, ARC1, and ARC2, collectively form a nucleotide-binding pocket that adopts different conformations depending on the bound nucleotide. This mechanism seems to be conserved between proteins from organisms as distant as bacteria, metazoans, and plants (Rairdan and Moffett, 2007; Danot et al., 2009; Takken and Tameling, 2009). The conformational change coincides with the exchange of bound ADP for ATP in the NB-ARC, probably stabilizing the active conformation (Tameling et al., 2006; Ade et al., 2007). Hydrolysis of the bound ATP is hypothesized to return the domains to their inactive state. The exact mechanism by which elicitor recognition via the LRR leads to a conformational change of the NB-ARC and the subsequent activation of immune signaling pathways is not clear.Previous studies have shown that the CC/TIR, NB-ARC, and LRR domains in plant immune receptors interact and cooperate with each other in an interdependent manner (Moffett et al., 2002; Leister et al., 2005; Ade et al., 2007; Rairdan et al., 2008). From these data, a picture emerges in which the LRR domain is not only involved in pathogen recognition, but also plays a role in maintaining an autoinhibited resting state in the absence of pathogens via its interactions with the other domains (Bendahmane et al., 2002; Hwang and Williamson, 2003; Ade et al., 2007; Qi et al., 2012). A similar role as regulatory domain has been found for the sensor domains of other NLRs, such as the mammalian Apaf1 (Hu et al., 1998). For the potato (Solanum tuberosum) immune receptor Rx1, a model plant NB-LRR protein, it has been shown that the LRR cooperates with the ARC subdomains in retaining the inactive state of the protein. The deletion of the ARC and LRR domains leads to a constitutive activity of the NB (Bendahmane et al., 2002; Rairdan et al., 2008). In addition, it was demonstrated that the elicitor, the Potato virus X (PVX) coat protein, modifies the interdomain interactions in Rx1 (Moffett et al., 2002; Rairdan et al., 2008). Sequence exchanges between Rx1 and the highly homologous nematode resistance protein Gpa2 (88% amino acid identity) resulted in incompatibilities between the domains that give rise to inappropriate activation of cell death responses (Rairdan and Moffett, 2006), indicating that the cooperation between the sensor and switch domains depends on an interaction fine tuned by intramolecular coevolution. In this light, it is interesting to note that a functional ortholog of Rx1, Rx2 from Solanum acaule, is almost identical to Rx1 in its LRR region but displays a higher similarity to Gpa2 in stretches of its CC-NB-ARC sequence (Bendahmane et al., 2000).The aim of our study was to pinpoint the molecular determinants controlling the switch between the resting and activation state of NB-LRR proteins. The incompatibility between the ARC and LRR domains of Rx1 and Gpa2 was used as a guideline to dissect the molecular and structural determinants involved in the cooperation between the switch (NB-ARC) and sensor (LRR) domain. An extensive exchange of polymorphic residues between these two homologous NB-LRR proteins resulted in the identification of a minimal fragment of 68 amino acid residues in the ARC2 domain and the first LRR repeats as being crucial for proper activation of Gpa2 and Rx1. Within this minimal region, we identified two amino acids that, despite their proximity in the amino acid sequence, differentiate between elicitor-dependent (position 401) and independent activation (position 403). However, structural modeling of the domains shows that the residue at position 403 operates at the interface of the ARC2 and N-terminal part of the LRR domain, while residue 401 mapped at the interface between the ARC2 and NB domain. Furthermore, an acidic loop region in the ARC2 domain and complementary-charged basic patches in the N-terminal half of the LRR domain are shown to be required for the physical interaction between these domains. We demonstrate that the binding between the CC- NB-ARC and LRR domains is disrupted upon elicitor-dependent activation and that the complementary-charged residues are predicted to facilitate reassociation. Two independent docking simulations of the NB-ARC and LRR domain indicate that the LRR domain binds to the NB-ARC domain at the surface formed by the interaction of the ARC2 and NB subdomains. We present a mechanistic model in which the first repeats of the LRR, the ARC2 subdomain, and the NB form a clamp, which governs the shuttling between a closed, autoinhibited “off” state and an open, active “on” state of the resistance protein. Finally, we discuss the consequences of the functional constraints imposed by the interface of the NB, ARC2, and LRR domain for the generation of novel resistance specificities via evolutionary processes and genetic engineering.     

Genotypic diversity, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence factors of human isolates and probiotic cultures constituting two intraspecific groups of Enterococcus faecium isolates

The intraspecific relationships among a collection of Enterococcus faecium isolates comprising probiotic cultures and human clinical isolates were investigated through the combined use of two high-resolution DNA-fingerprinting techniques. In addition, the incidences of antimicrobial resistance and virulence traits were investigated. A total of 128 E. faecium isolates from human clinical or nonclinical sources or used as probiotic cultures were subjected to fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism (FAFLP) fingerprinting and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of SmaI macrorestriction patterns. Susceptibilities to 16 antimicrobial agents were tested using broth microdilution, and the presence of the corresponding resistance genes was investigated using PCR. Multiplex PCR was used to detect the presence of the enterococcal virulence genes asa1, gelE, cylA, esp, and hyl. The results of the study showed that two intraspecific genomic groups (I and II) were obtained in FAFLP analysis. PFGE analysis demonstrated high variability within these two groups but also indicated that some probiotic cultures were indistinguishable and that a number of clinical isolates may be reisolations of commercial probiotic cultures. Compared to group II, which contained the majority of the probiotic isolates and fewer human clinical isolates, higher phenotypic and genotypic resistance frequencies were observed in group I. Two probiotic isolates were phenotypically resistant to erythromycin, one of which contained an erm(B) gene that was not transferable to enterococcal recipients. None of the probiotic E. faecium isolates demonstrated the presence of the tested virulence genes. The previously reported observation that E. faecium consists of two intraspecific genomic groups was further substantiated by FAFLP fingerprinting of 128 isolates. In combination with antimicrobial resistance and virulence testing, this grouping might represent an additional criterion in assessing the safety of new potential probiotic E. faecium isolates.     

On the mechanism of pore formation by melittin

The mechanism of pore formation of lytic peptides, such as melittin from bee venom, is thought to involve binding to the membrane surface, followed by insertion at threshold levels of bound peptide. We show that in membranes composed of zwitterionic lipids, i.e. phosphatidylcholine, melittin not only forms pores but also inhibits pore formation. We propose that these two modes of action are the result of two competing reactions: direct insertion into the membrane and binding parallel to the membrane surface. The direct insertion of melittin leads to pore formation, whereas the parallel conformation is inactive and prevents other melittin molecules from inserting, hence preventing pore formation.