Persistence and vulnerability: Retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas

An objective of biodiversity conservation activities is to minimize the exposure of biodiversity features to threatening processes and to ensure, as far as possible, that biodiversity persists in the landscape. We discuss how issues of vulnerability and persistence can and should be addressed at all stages of the conservation planning and implementation process. Procedures for estimating the likelihood of persistence and for measuring degrees of vulnerability at different spatial and temporal scales using subjective assessments, rules of thumb and analytical and simulation models are reviewed. The application of information on vulnerability and persistence to conservation planning and management is discussed under the headings of natural dynamics, replication of protection, levels of representation, source and sink population structures, refuges and critical resources, reserve design, habitat fragmentation and levels of management.     

Abundance-range size relationships in British birds: is unexplained variation a product of life history?

Positive interspecific relationships between local abundance and geographic range size are a common feature of animal assemblages However, range size typically explains only a moderate proportion of the variation m abundance, begging the question of whether species of differing life history deviate from the underlying relationship in any systematic fashion Using data for the avifauna of Britain, and applying a comparative method to control for the effects of phylogenetic association, we demonstrate that this does not appear to be the case Only adult survivorship, age at independence and incubation period explain significant variation in abundance once range size is controlled for statistically, and then only a few percent There are two probable reasons why this result is contrary to general expectation First, although many life history variables are expected to show simple correlations with abundance or range size It is not obvious how these might relate to variation about the abundance–range size relationship Second, intuitive ideas about the form such variation might take may be seriously confounded by phylogenetic non–independence