Corticotropin-releasing Factor Receptor 2 Mediates Sex-Specific Cellular Stress Responses

Although females suffer twice as much as males from stress-related disorders, sex-specific participating and pathogenic cellular stress mechanisms remain uncharacterized. Using corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 2–deficient (Crhr2^−/− ) and wild-type (WT) mice, we show that CRF receptor type 2 (CRF₂) and its high-affinity ligand, urocortin 1 (Ucn1), are key mediators of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response in a murine model of acute pancreatic inflammation. Ucn1 was expressed de novo in acinar cells of male, but not female WT mice during acute inflammation. Upon insult, acinar Ucn1 induction was markedly attenuated in male but not female Crhr2^−/− mice. Crhr₂^−/− mice of both sexes show exacerbated acinar cell inflammation and necrosis. Electron microscopy showed mild ER damage in WT male mice and markedly distorted ER structure in Crhr2^−/− male mice during pancreatitis. WT and Crhr2^−/− female mice showed similarly distorted ER ultrastructure that was less severe than distortion seen in Crhr2^−/− male mice. Damage in ER structure was accompanied by increased ubiquitination, peIF2, and mistargeted localization of vimentin in WT mice that was further exacerbated in Crhr2^−/− mice of both sexes during pancreatitis. Exogenous Ucn1 rescued many aspects of histological damage and cellular stress response, including restoration of ER structure in male WT and Crhr2^−/−mice, but not in females. Instead, females often showed increased damage. Thus, specific cellular pathways involved in coping and resolution seem to be distinct to each sex. Our results demonstrate the importance of identifying sex-specific pathogenic mechanisms and their value in designing effective therapeutics.     

Copper Nitrate Catalyzed Three-Component One-Pot Synthesis of 3,4-Dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-Ones

Abstract

An efficient synthesis of 3,4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones from aldehydes, 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds, and urea using copper nitrate under refluxing temperature in ethanol was described. Compared with other Lewis copper salts, copper nitrate proved to be the most efficient. The advantages of the new method were good yields (61–93%), short reaction time (0.4–3 h), and inexpensive catalyst.     

Enhanced Phase II Detoxification Contributes to Beneficial Effects of Dietary Restriction as Revealed by Multi-platform Metabolomics Studies

Dietary restriction (DR) has many beneficial effects, but the detailed metabolic mechanism remains largely unresolved. As diet is essentially related to metabolism, we investigated the metabolite profiles of urines from control and DR animals using NMR and LC/MS metabolomic approaches. Multivariate analysis presented distinctive metabolic profiles and marker signals from glucuronide and glycine conjugation pathways in the DR group. Broad profiling of the urine phase II metabolites with neutral loss scanning showed that levels of glucuronide and glycine conjugation metabolites were generally higher in the DR group. The up-regulation of phase II detoxification in the DR group was confirmed by mRNA and protein expression levels of uridinediphospho-glucuronosyltransferase and glycine-N-acyltransferase in actual liver tissues. Histopathology and serum biochemistry showed that DR was correlated with the beneficial effects of low levels of serum alanine transaminase and glycogen granules in liver. In addition, the Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 signaling pathway was shown to be up-regulated, providing a mechanistic clue regarding the enhanced phase II detoxification in liver tissue. Taken together, our metabolomic and biochemical studies provide a possible metabolic perspective for understanding the complex mechanism underlying the beneficial effects of DR.It has been known for more than 70 years that dietary restriction (DR)¹ can extend the life span and delay the onset of age-related diseases, based on an early rodent study showing such effects (1). However, not until the 1980s was DR recognized as a good model for studying the mechanism of or inhibitory measures for aging (2). So far, extensive studies employing model organisms such as yeasts, nematodes, fruit flies, and rodents have shown that DR has beneficial effects in most of the species studied (for a review, see Ref. 3). Most notably, a recent 20-year-long study showed that monkeys, the species closest to humans, also benefit from DR similarly (4). Although there has not been (or could not have been) a systematic study on the effects of DR on the human life span, several longitudinal studies strongly suggest that changes in dietary intake can affect the life span and/or disease-associated marker values greatly (5–7).This inverse correlation between dietary intake and long-term health strongly indicates that DR''s effects should involve metabolism, and that DR elicits the reorganization of metabolic pathways. It also seems quite natural that something we eat should affect the body''s metabolism. Despite this seemingly straightforward relationship between diet and metabolism, the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of DR are anything but simple. Intensive efforts, spanning decades, to understand the mechanisms of DR have identified several genes that might mediate the effects of DR, such as mTOR, IGF-1, AMPK, and SIRT1 (for a review, see Ref. 8). Still, most of them are involved in early nutrient-sensing steps, and specific metabolic pathways, especially those at the final steps actually responsible for the effects of DR, are largely unknown.This might be at least partially due to the fact that previous studies have focused mostly on genomic or proteomic changes induced by DR, instead of looking at changes in metabolism or metabolites directly. Metabolomics, which has gained much interest in recent years (9–11), might be a good alternative for addressing the mechanistic uncertainty of DR''s effects, with the direct profiling of metabolic changes elicited by environmental factors. In contrast to genomics or proteomics, which often employ DNA or proteins extracted from particular tissues, metabolomics studies mostly employ body fluids (i.e. urine or blood), which can reflect the metabolic status of multiple organs, enabling investigations at a more systemic level. In particular, urine has been used extensively to study the mechanism of external stimuli (i.e. drugs or toxic insults) at most major target organs, such as the lung, kidney, liver, or heart (12–18). Still, metabolomics studies of DR effects have been very limited. A few previous ones reported the changes in phenomenological urine metabolic markers with DR, without identification and/or validation of specific metabolic pathways reflected at the actual tissue or enzyme level (19, 20). Therefore, those studies fell short of providing a mechanistic perspective on DR''s effects. In addition, they employed either NMR or LC/MS approaches without validation across the two analytical platforms.Among the metabolic pathways that can directly affect the integrity of multiple organs, and hence long-term health, are phase II detoxification pathways (21). Typically, lipophilic endo/xenobiotics are metabolized first by a phase I system, such as cytochrome P450, which modifies the compounds so that they have hydrophilic functional groups for increased solubility. In many cases, though, these modifications might increase the reactivity of the compounds, leading to cellular damage. The phase II detoxification systems involve conjugation reactions that attach charged hydrophilic molecular moieties to reactive metabolites, thus facilitating the elimination of the harmful metabolites from body, ultimately reducing their toxicity (22). These systems are thus especially important in protecting cellular macromolecules, such as DNA and proteins, from reactive electrophilic or nucleophilic metabolites. The enzymes involved in these processes include glutathione-S-transferase (GST), sulfotransferase, glycine-N-acyltransferase (GLYAT), and uridinediphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT), with the last enzyme being the most prevalent (23). The beneficial effects of phase II reactions have been particularly studied in relation to the mechanism of healthy dietary ingredients. It is well believed that many such foods can prevent cancers (hence the term “chemoprevention”) by inducing phase II detoxification systems (24–26). Although DR also substantially reduces the incidence of cancers, the exact mechanism remains elusive.Here, we employed multi-platform metabolomics to obtain metabolic perspectives on the beneficial effects of DR on rats. Our results about urine metabolomics markers suggest that DR enhances the phase II detoxification pathway, which was confirmed by means of conjugation metabolite profiling and changes in mRNA/protein expression levels of phase II enzymes in actual liver tissues. A possible molecular mechanism was also addressed through the exploration of Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf-2) pathway activation upon DR. We believe the current study provides new metabolic insights into DR''s beneficial effects, as well as a workflow for studying DR''s effects from a metabolic perspective.