Castoreum and Steel Traps in Eastern North America

Historians and anthropologists have credited the invention of trapping beaver with castoreum bait and steel traps to the Indians of southeastern Canada in the 1790s. However, English trappers in Virginia used this technique before 1728, and the Indians of southeastern Canada were using it by 1756. It is suggested that the widespread adoption of castoreum and steel traps by Northeastern Indians in the 1790's was due to the collapse of the world fur market after the French Revolution.     

A COMPARISON OF THE MOLLUSCAN COMMUNITIES ON INTERTIDAL SAND FLATS IN OYSTER HARBOUR AND PEEL INLET, WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Intertidal molluscs on sandflats in Oyster Harbour and PeelInlet, Western Australia, were compared using transects. Twenty-fourspecies of molluscs were recorded in Oyster Harbour and only7 in Peel Inlet. Two groupings were foundin Oyster Harbour:a midlittoral component and infralittoral fringe. There wasno vertical community structure in Peel Inlet. Molluscs retainedon a 1 mm sieve had about the same mean density and biomassin the two areas but molluscs retained on a 2 mm sieve had amean density of 203/m² and a biomass of 132 g/m² in Oyster Harbourand were absent in Peel Inlet. Several possible reasons forthe absence of large molluscs in Peel Inlet are discussed. PeelInlet is on the west coast in a faunal overlap zone where thenumber of species is reduced. The mean temperature in Peel Inletis 2-3°C higher than in Oyster Harbour and salinity variationsare much more pronounced. (Received 20 November 1979;     

Early Cretaceous record of microboring organisms in skeletons of growing corals

Ko?odziej, B., Golubic, S., Bucur, I.I., Radtke, G. & Tribollet, A. 2011: Early Cretaceous record of microboring organisms in skeletons of growing corals. Lethaia, Vol. 45, pp. 34–45. A spectacularly preserved assemblage of microbial euendoliths, penetrating into skeletons of growing scleractinian corals, has been recognized in Early Aptian (Early Cretaceous) reef limestone of the Rar?u Mountains (East Carpathians, NE Romania). Microboring euendolithic filaments were found in five coral colonies of the suborder Microsolenina. They remained in part well‐preserved, often impregnated with iron oxides, which made them visible even in strongly recrystallized parts of coral skeletons. Filaments of a wide range of sizes (2–40 μm in diameter) were concentrated within medium parts of coral septa, oriented along the septa in the direction of the coral growth. The larger filaments were tubular, occurring in bundles and branched into finer, often tapering branches. Their behaviour and organization were quite similar to the modern euendolithic siphonalean chlorophyte Ostreobium. Filament diameters exceeded those reported for the modern species, but covered a similarly wide size range. Narrower frequently branching filaments, 4–8 μm in diameter, resemble distal branching patterns of modern Ostreobium quekettii. Some very thin filaments (ca. 1–2 μm) observed within skeleton or inside the large tubular filaments, sometimes associated with globular swellings, may represent euendolithic fungi. The recrystallization of coral skeleton had limited effect on preservation of euendoliths due to their impregnation with iron oxides; microbial euendoliths were subjected to different taphonomic changes. □Chlorophytes, Early Cretaceous, fungi, microbial euendoliths, Romania, scleractinian corals.     

Pleistocene refugia and polytopic replacement of diploids by tetraploids in the Patagonian and Subantarctic plant Hypochaeris incana (Asteraceae, Cichorieae)

We report the phylogeographic pattern of the Patagonian and Subantarctic plant Hypochaeris incana endemic to southeastern South America. We applied amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) analysis to 28 and 32 populations, respectively, throughout its distributional range and assessed ploidy levels using flow cytometry. While cpDNA data suggest repeated or simultaneous parallel colonization of Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego by several haplotypes and/or hybridization, AFLPs reveal three clusters corresponding to geographic regions. The central and northern Patagonian clusters (∼38–51° S), which are closer to the outgroup, contain mainly tetraploid, isolated and highly differentiated populations with low genetic diversity. To the contrary, the southern Patagonian and Fuegian cluster (∼51–55° S) contains mainly diploid populations with high genetic diversity and connected by high levels of gene flow. The data suggest that H. incana originated at the diploid level in central or northern Patagonia, from where it migrated south. All three areas, northern, central and southern, have similar levels of rare and private AFLP bands, suggesting that all three served as refugia for H. incana during glacial times. In southern Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego, the species seems to have expanded its populational system in postglacial times, when the climate became warmer and more humid. In central and northern Patagonia, the populations seem to have become restricted to favourable sites with increasing temperature and decreasing moisture and there was a parallel replacement of diploids by tetraploids in local populations.     

Temporal and spatial environmental variability in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain

• 1 This paper develops a framework of spatial and temporal variability for a habitat typology of the Upper Rhône River (France) and its alluvial floodplain that is based on about 17 years of data collection and analysis. The aim was to provide a scale of spatial-temporal variability for river habitat templet predictions on trends in species traits and species richness.
• 2 In developing this framework, eight physical-chemical variables were available and could be considered for twenty-two habitat types: seventeen superficial (surface) and five interstitial (0.5 m below the substrate surface). These habitat types were selected in two areas (Jons and Brégnier-Cordon) after geomorphological considerations and because of differences in their biological characteristics.
• 3 The data sets used were processed by a ‘fuzzy coding’ method using, for each variable, the frequency distribution (by modalities = categories) of all measurements and monthly means over an annual scale. Two tables were produced; the first corresponded to an expression of the total variability, and the second represented an evaluation of the temporal variability.
• 4 Each of these tables was analysed by correspondence analysis, which provided factorial scores that were used to calculate, by habitat type and by variable, a total variability and a temporal variability in terms of cumulated variability of factorial scores for the eight physical–chemical variables. The rationale in describing variability from these two tables is that total variability equals temporal variability plus spatial variability. The spatial variability was then determined by the difference between total and temporal variability. From this procedure, a positioning of the twenty-two habitat types on the spatial and temporal variability axes was obtained.
• 5 The estimate of spatial variability did not consider any error term that may have occurred in the above model; it was then tested by an independent assessment of the spatial variability using thirteen variables in nine major habitat types. A high correlation between the two ways of assessing spatial variability (r = 0.85, P < 0.004) underscored the reliability of the spatial variability that was calculated previously.
• 6 The river habitat templet obtained for the Upper Rhône and its alluvial floodplain appears to be appropriate to test the predictions on patterns of species traits and species richness in the framework of spatial and temporal variability.