The evolution of Spartina anglica G. E. Hubbard (Gramineae): genetic variation and status of the parental species in Britain

The perennial salt marsh grass Spartina anglica is one of the classic examples of allopolyploid speciation. It originated on the south coast of England at the end of the nineteenth century following chromosome doubling in S. × townsmdii , a hybrid between the native British S. marilima and a species introduced from the United States, S. alterniflora. The nature of the origin of S. anglica is beyond doubt; however, it is not known whether it had a single or multiple origin. In order to address this problem we undertook a survey of the genetic variation in the parental species of S. anglica using isozyme electrophoresis. The results show that S. alterniflora has no detectable variation and that S. maritima has extremely low levels of variation. These results, unfortunately, prevent the question of a single or multiple origin from being answered. Possible reasons for the low levels of variation and its influence on the future of the species are discussed. Another problem concerning the parental species is the rapid decline of S. maritima in Britain. It is often assumed that the major factor in this regression is the invasion of its habitats by S. anglica. We have examined the status of S. marilima throughout its range in Britain and have found that S. anglica rarely co-occurs with S. maritima. We propose that the decline of S. maritima is largely due to the physical erosion of its habitats and that this erosion may produce suitable habitats for colonization by S. anglica.     

IMPROVEMENT OF SELECTIVITY FOR ISOLATION OF ESCHERICHIA COLI O157:H7 FROM GENERIC ESCHERICHIA COLI

A modified selective medium was developed to increase selectivity for isolation of Escherichia coli O157 from generic E. coli based on the knowledge that E. coli O157:H7 has more resistance against HCl condition than E. coli. As a preliminary experiment, four strains of E. coli O157:H7 (ATCC 35150, 43889, 43890, and 43894) were tested to determine the maximum concentration of 6N HCl (from 0 to 250 μL) added to 50 mL of MacConkey agar medium (MAC). The maximum level was 125 μL/50 mL (6N HCl/MAC), which E. coli O157:H7 strains could tolerate against the HCl concentration. After determination, comparative growth of 15 isolates of E. coli O157 and generic E. coli were evaluated on modified selective medium (HCl-MAC; with the addition of 125 μL/50 mL) and conventional MAC, respectively. All tested strains of E. coli O157 were grown on both media, whereas 9 out of 15 generic E. coli (60% of tested strains) were strongly inhibited on HCl-MAC. For selective isolation of E. coli O157 from generic E. coli, HCl-MAC has an effective potential for an implemental use. This information can extend as a baseline for use of HCl to conventional medium for successful isolation E. coli O157 from generic E. coli.     

TEMPORAL VARIATION IN FORAGING BEHAVIOUR OF PATELLA GRANULARIS (PATELLOGASTROPODA) AND SIPHONARIA CONCINNA (BASOMMATOPHORA) ON A SOUTH AFRICAN SHORE

Foraging activity of two mid- to low- shore species of limpet,Patella granulans (Prosobranchia) and Siphonaria concinna (Pulmonata)from an exposed shore on the Eastern Cape coast of South Africawas monitored. In both species, activity was compared duringspring and neap tides and, in P. granularis between summer andwinter. Rhythms of activity of the two species were similar,with foraging excursions being mainly associated with nocturnallow tide times, although some P. granularis foraged during daytimelow tides. It is suggested that foraging excursions in P. granularisare triggered by wave action. Both species foraged further onspring tides than on neap tides and this is suggested to bea result of the limited time limpets have to forage. P. granulariswas also found to forage further during summer when comparedto winter and the possibility that seasonal micro-algal productivityinfluences foraging distances in limpets is discussed. The foraging activity of both species could be divided into3 distinct phases, a relatively rapid outward phase, a muchslower foraging phase and a rapid homeward phase. Whether ornot these limpets graze throughout an excursion is not known.S. concinna was found to home to a fixed scar, although duringthe experiment some scar-swapping occurred. P. granularis didnot home to a fixed scar but possessed a ‘home range’(approx. 5 cm²) to which it returned after each excursion. Patella granularis was found to move randomly during foraging,whilst S. concinna foraged in a non-random direction -whichtook individuals upshore. No tidal-influence is thought to bepresent in this case and the possibility of a learning componentin the foraging behaviour of certain limpet species in relationto the return to optimal feeding patches is discussed. (Received 18 May 1996; accepted 2 September 1996)     

Seasonal changes in a cactus‐hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) network

1. We analysed a cacti‐syrphid community focusing on the exploitation of decaying cacti resources by the flies, i.e. if exploitation exhibited a nested topology as a structural pattern, or whether it was temporally random. If availability of cactus resources was predictable during the rainy season, it would then be exploited by a more structured community, or as resource availability would be unpredictable during the dry season, we should expect it to be exploited by a random community. 2. We registered 12 Copestylum species (9 in dry and 11 in rainy season). Four cactus species were recorded per season, three were shared between seasons. 3. The community of Copestylum larvae in the rainy season was not randomly assembled but highly nested, revealing a highly structured pattern of resource use. It exhibited a random organization for the dry season. The high nestedness value obtained for the rainy season suggests that factors along with competition must play a major role in determining community structure. 4. Succession in the cacti‐syrphid community mediated by microorganisms involved in necrosis is an important factor structuring nested subsets. The studied networks were small, which may limit the power of the analysis, and strong conclusions could also be limited.