HopQ1 (for Hrp outer protein Q), a type III effector secreted by
Pseudomonas syringae pv
phaseolicola, is widely conserved among diverse genera of plant bacteria. It promotes the development of halo blight in common bean (
Phaseolus vulgaris). However, when this same effector is injected into
Nicotiana benthamiana cells, it is recognized by the immune system and prevents infection. Although the ability to synthesize HopQ1 determines host specificity, the role it plays inside plant cells remains unexplored. Following transient expression in planta, HopQ1 was shown to copurify with host 14-3-3 proteins. The physical interaction between HopQ1 and 14-3-3a was confirmed in planta using the fluorescence resonance energy transfer-fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy technique. Moreover, mass spectrometric analyses detected specific phosphorylation of the canonical 14-3-3 binding site (RSXpSXP, where pS denotes phosphoserine) located in the amino-terminal region of HopQ1. Amino acid substitution within this motif abrogated the association and led to altered subcellular localization of HopQ1. In addition, the mutated HopQ1 protein showed reduced stability in planta. These data suggest that the association between host 14-3-3 proteins and HopQ1 is important for modulating the properties of this bacterial effector.A multicomponent defense response is initiated when plant pattern recognition receptors perceive microbially derived structural components (
Nürnberger and Brunner, 2002), which are referred to as pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Many bacterial pathogens have developed type III secretion system (
TTSS) effectors that can suppress or modulate pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity (
Jones and Dangl, 2006). Effector-triggered immunity represents a second layer of defense, whereby plants have evolved mechanisms that rely upon Resistance (R) proteins to sense and respond to cognate
TTSS effectors. Thus, the expression of a specific bacterial effector can either sustain disease in susceptible plants or render the pathogen avirulent in resistant plants that express the corresponding R protein. Several lines of evidence suggest an involvement of scaffold proteins from the 14-3-3 family in mediating these defense responses at various levels (
Yang et al., 2009;
Oh et al., 2010). Some R proteins have been shown to bind 14-3-3 proteins directly. RPW2.8, which confers resistance to fungal pathogens of
Golovinomyces spp., associates specifically with the 14-3-3 isoform λ (designated GF14λ) from Arabidopsis (
Arabidopsis thaliana;
Yang et al., 2009). Moreover, both types of resistance were compromised in Arabidopsis lacking the λ isoform. Consistently, ectopic overexpression of GF14λ in transgenic Arabidopsis results in enhanced resistance to powdery mildew (
Golovinomyces cichoracearum;
Yang et al., 2009). Tobacco (
Nicotiana tabacum) N protein, which mediates resistance to
Tobacco mosaic virus, also binds 14-3-3 protein (
Ueda et al., 2006). The viral p50 replicase helicase domain is the cognate ligand for N protein. Since this domain also interacts with 14-3-3s, it is possible that 14-3-3s might function in the formation of the receptor-ligand recognition complex (
Ueda et al., 2006). In addition, the tomato (
Solanum lycopersicum) 14-3-3 protein TF7 has been shown to exhibit positive regulation on the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade, which is activated rapidly by pathogen recognition (
Oh et al., 2010;
Oh and Martin, 2011).There is increasing evidence that many intracellular pathways are regulated by the modulation of scaffold protein properties rather than the activities of integral components in the signaling cascades (
Good et al., 2011). This strategy enables signal transduction to be turned on or off rapidly via the assembly or disassembly of complexes. This same mechanism also allows the intensity and kinetics of a response to be fine-tuned to the stimulus (
Good et al., 2011). It was recently suggested that the manipulation of scaffolding may be one strategy employed by pathogens to interfere with the host defense response. The best-characterized example of scaffolding manipulation is the phytotoxin fusicoccin, which is secreted by the fungus
Fusicoccum amygdali. Fusicoccin targets a 14-3-3 protein that regulates guard cell H
+-ATPases, and its activity results in stomatal opening, facilitating pathogen entry (
Oecking et al., 1994). Some bacterial virulence factors simply require scaffold proteins to reach their destination within host cells or to become enzymatically active, while others target the host scaffold proteins to suppress defenses.
Yersinia species secrete the
TTSS effector YopK (for
Yersinia outer protein K), which binds to the Receptor for Activated C Kinase1 in mammals (
Thorslund et al., 2011). It is hypothesized that this interaction blocks phagocytosis, allowing efficient extracellular proliferation of the bacteria.
Yersinia spp. has also acquired the virulence factor YopM, which mimics eukaryotic scaffolds and forces bridging of host kinases (
McDonald et al., 2003). Similarly, enterohemorrhagic
Escherichia coli strains use EspG to form an artificial complex that effectively reprograms host signaling (
Selyunin et al., 2011).HopQ1 (for Hrp outer protein Q [also known as HopQ1-1];
{"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"AAZ37975.1","term_id":"71558765","term_text":"AAZ37975.1"}}AAZ37975.1) is a type III effector that has been acquired recently by
Pseudomonas syringae strains (
Rohmer et al., 2004), whereas its xenologs from
Ralstonia solanacearum and
Xanthomonas spp. appear to be ancient. HopQ1 contributes to host specificity, but its exact role in pathogenesis remains undefined. This study shows that HopQ1 must undergo a specific phosphorylation event in planta as a prerequisite for its binding to host 14-3-3 and that its properties depend upon the formation of the effector-host protein complex.
相似文献