A Win at Short Odds

Patients with esophageal hiatal hernia often have an array of distressing complaints and physical signs that are difficult to interpret. Physiologic and anatomic studies of the gastroesophageal area in the region of the esophageal hiatus of the diaphragm indicate the existence of a three-in-line sphincter group, consisting of the inferior esophageal constrictor, diaphragmatic pinchcock and cardioesophageal junction. These mechanisms, acting in unison, prevent regurgitation in normal persons.It also can be deduced from clinical, radiologic and experimental data that anatomic disturbances at the esophageal hiatus account for physiologic alterations. A reasonable explanation for the symptoms and signs of esophageal hiatal hernia can be made on the basis of the functional competence of the three-in-line sphincter mechanisms.     

Allergy and the atomic age

Traumatic peripheral nerve lesions characteristically result in denervation muscular atrophy. Atrophy of disuse may take place concomitantly, either proximal, adjacent to or distal to the denervation muscular atrophy. The degree of atrophy of disuse depends upon the severity of the nerve lesion. Clinically, it is difficult to determine where true denervation muscular atrophy ends and accompanying atrophy of disuse begins. In such circumstances a clinician may be misled into belief that the cause of so apparently extensive a lesion is elsewhere. The patient then is often submitted to other complex diagnostic procedures and treatments. This difficulty can usually be dissipated by the use of electromyography, for each specific type of muscular atrophy produces its own characteristic electromyographic changes. Disuse atrophy produces no changes in electrical activity, whereas denervation atrophy manifests itself by typical denervation activity. Moreover it is possible to determine what part of muscular atrophy in a given area is owing to damage to a nerve and what part is owing only to disuse without denervation.