Valine-sensitive acetohydroxy acid synthases in Escherichia coli K-12: unique regulation modulated by multiple genetic sites.

Summary Spontaneous mutants (146) of Escherichia coli K-12 were selected that were resistant to inhibition of growth by 1.2 mM L-valine (Val^r). The Val^r isolates, containing acetohydroxy acid synthase resistant to feedback inhibition by L-valine (AHAS^r), were classed according to cotransduction of the mutation with leu. Several mutations resulting in an AHAS^r phenotype were found to be cotransducible with glyA. However, no mutations causing a Val^r phenotype were linked to ilv. AHAS activity was more closely examined in representatives of three classes of mutants with Val^r linked to leu, labeled ilv-660, ilv-661, and ilv-662. The ilvE503 allele in E. coli K-12, known to cause a two- to three-fold derepression of AHAS, was found to affect regulation of synthesis of both valine-sensitive AHAS (AHAS^s) and AHAS^r in the mutants containing ilv-660 and ilv-661, whereas it affected repression of AHAS^s, only, in the mutant containing ilv-662. Further, both AHAS^s and AHAS^r in the ilv-661 mutant were repressed by valine, whereas valine did not repress AHAS^r synthesis in the strain carrying ilv-660 and only partially repressed AHAS^r in the strain carrying ilv-662. Unexpectedly, AHAS^r synthesis in strains carrying ilv-660 or ilv-662 was repressible by leucine. The ilv-660 locus appears to be similar in position to ilvH and encodes a product that confers valine-sensitivity upon AHAS activity in the wild-type E. coli K-12. The ilv-660 and ilv-662 loci may normally encode products that influence both the feedback sensitivity of AHAS and control of AHAS biosynthesis.     

Purification and characterization of two isoenzymes of lipoxygenase from soybeans

A chromatographic procedure for the purification of two lipoxygenase isoenzymes (linoleate: O₂ oxidoreductase, EC 1.13.11.12.) from soybean is described. The procedure for the purification of isoenzyme L-1 includes optimalized extraction, ammonium sulfate fractionation, heat treatment and gradient elution from a CM-Sephadex C-50 column. The purification of L-2 includes ammonium sulfate fractionation, gelfiltration on Sephadex G-150 and gradient elution from a DEAE-cellulose column. Both isoenzymes L-1 and L-2 appear homogeneous after Disc-PAGE. The isoelectric points are 5.6 for L-1 and 5.8 for L-2. Molecular weights are estimated as 100,000 for L-1 as well as L-2 applying three different methods. Both isoenzymes contain 0.9 mol iron per mol protien. The estimated turn over numbers are 8,200 mol linoleate per mol enzyme and min for L-1 and 3,100 for L-2. Amino acid compositions determined after acid hydrolysis show marked differences between L-1 and L-2, particularly with respect to the amino acids Lys, Phe, Ser, Gly and Leu. L-1 posesses a total of 9 cysteine molecules, 6 of which are present as disulfide bonds. L-2 posesses a total of 8 cysteine molecules with only one disulfide bond.These results have been presented in part at the 13th ISF Congress in Marseille on 2nd September 1976     

Histological characterization of in vitro regenerated structures of Panax ginseng

Callus was induced from mature leaf lamina, petiole, stem, and main and branch root of Panax ginseng and maintained under different nutrient and light conditions. Heterogenous callus cultures differentiated organoids and/or embryoids. Embryoids that arose from callus cultures of leaf origin germinated into shoots. The occurrence of the early stages of different regenerated structures was proved on histological level.     

A new homeobox-leucine zipper gene from Arabidopsis thaliana

We have isolated a homeobox-containing gene from Arabidopsis thaliana using a degenerate oligonucleotide probe corresponding to the most conserved region of the homeodomain. This strategy has been used previously to isolate homeobox-containing genes from Caenorhabditis, and recently from A. thaliana. The Arabidopsis genes have an unusual structure in that they have a leucine zipper motif adjacent to the carboxy terminal region of the homeo domain, a feature not found in homeobox-containing genes isolated from animals. We report the isolation and primary structure of a new member of this Arabidopsis homeobox-leucine zipper gene family. This new member has the homeodomain and leucine-zipper motif similar to the two genes previously identified, but differs from these genes in the part corresponding to the carboxy terminus of the polypeptide, as well as in size and isoelectric point of the protein.     

Role of H-2 antigens in the host response to methylcholanthrene-induced tumors

H-2 loss variant sublines of a sarcoma (M-AS), induced by methylcholanthrene in an (A × A.SW)F₁ mouse, were used to study the role of the MHC products in the recognition of MC-TSTA. The two reciprocal variant sublines (M-A and M-S) were found to express the TSTA of the original tumor as shown by cross-reactions in graft rejection experiments performed in (A × A.SW)F₁ mice. In the A/Sn and A.SW mice the presence of the reciprocal parental H-2 antigens on the immunizing cells decreased the response against the tumor antigens. An admixture of lymphocytes derived from hyperimmune mice inhibited the outgrowth of the tumor cells. The growth inhibition was mediated by T cells and was H-2 restricted. Cells derived from hyperimmune syngeneic mice inhibited the outgrowth of the variant subline used for immunization but had no effect on the reciprocal variant subline.     

Activated T lymphocytes within human solid tumors

Summary The majority of lymphocytes separated from tumor cell suspensions were T cells. Conjugates of T lymphocytes and tumor cells were often seen. Variable numbers of T cells exhibited signs of activation such as the ability to form stable E rosettes and attachment to normal and malignant cells (a phenomenon designated natural attachment: NA). A proportion of T cells activated in vitro by allogeneic stimulation regularly exhibit these properties. The T cell-tumor conjugates in the suspensions may represent the NA phenomenon, but they could also be the product of T cells that adhere on the basis of specific recognition of cell surface antigens.Abbreviations BBS balanced salt solution - E rosettes rosettes formed with sheep erythrocytes - EA rosettes rosettes formed with ox erythrocytes coated with anti-ox IgG - FCS fetal calf serum - MLC mixed lymphocyte cultures - NA natural attachment - PBL peripheral blood lymphocytes - SRBC sheep erythrocytes - T lymphocytes thymusderived lymphocytes     

The breakthrough paradox: How focusing on one form of innovation jeopardizes the advancement of science

Research needs a balance of risk‐taking in “breakthrough projects” and gradual progress. For building a sustainable knowledge base, it is indispensable to provide support for both. Subject Categories: Careers, Economics, Law & Politics, Science Policy & Publishing

Science is about venturing into the unknown to find unexpected insights and establish new knowledge. Increasingly, academic institutions and funding agencies such as the European Research Council (ERC) explicitly encourage and support scientists to foster risky and hopefully ground‐breaking research. Such incentives are important and have been greatly appreciated by the scientific community. However, the success of the ERC has had its downsides, as other actors in the funding ecosystem have adopted the ERC’s focus on “breakthrough science” and respective notions of scientific excellence. We argue that these tendencies are concerning since disruptive breakthrough innovation is not the only form of innovation in research. While continuous, gradual innovation is often taken for granted, it could become endangered in a research and funding ecosystem that places ever higher value on breakthrough science. This is problematic since, paradoxically, breakthrough potential in science builds on gradual innovation. If the value of gradual innovation is not better recognized, the potential for breakthrough innovation may well be stifled.

While continuous, gradual innovation is often taken for granted, it could become endangered in a research and funding ecosystem that places ever higher value on breakthrough science.

Concerns that the hypercompetitive dynamics of the current scientific system may impede rather than spur innovative research have been voiced for many years (Alberts et al, 2014). As performance indicators continue to play a central role for promotions and grants, researchers are under pressure to publish extensively, quickly, and preferably in high‐ranking journals (Burrows, 2012). These dynamics increase the risk of mental health issues among scientists (Jaremka et al, 2020), dis‐incentivise relevant and important work (Benedictus et al, 2016), decrease the quality of scientific papers (Sarewitz, 2016) and induce conservative and short‐term thinking rather than risk‐taking and original thinking required for scientific innovation (Alberts et al, 2014; Fochler et al, 2016). Against this background, strong incentives for fostering innovative and daring research are indispensable.