Genetic noise control via protein oligomerization

Background

Biochemical equilibria are usually modeled iteratively: given one or a few fitted models, if there is a lack of fit or over fitting, a new model with additional or fewer parameters is then fitted, and the process is repeated. The problem with this approach is that different analysts can propose and select different models and thus extract different binding parameter estimates from the same data. An alternative is to first generate a comprehensive standardized list of plausible models, and to then fit them exhaustively, or semi-exhaustively.

Results

A framework is presented in which equilibriums are modeled as pairs (g, h) where g = 0 maps total reactant concentrations (system inputs) into free reactant concentrations (system states) which h then maps into expected values of measurements (system outputs). By letting dissociation constants K _d be either freely estimated, infinity, zero, or equal to other K _d , and by letting undamaged protein fractions be either freely estimated or 1, many g models are formed. A standard space of g models for ligand-induced protein dimerization equilibria is given. Coupled to an h model, the resulting (g, h) were fitted to dTTP induced R1 dimerization data (R1 is the large subunit of ribonucleotide reductase). Models with the fewest parameters were fitted first. Thereafter, upon fitting a batch, the next batch of models (with one more parameter) was fitted only if the current batch yielded a model that was better (based on the Akaike Information Criterion) than the best model in the previous batch (with one less parameter). Within batches models were fitted in parallel. This semi-exhaustive approach yielded the same best models as an exhaustive model space fit, but in approximately one-fifth the time.

Conclusion

Comprehensive model space based biochemical equilibrium model selection methods are realizable. Their significance to systems biology as mappings of data into mathematical models warrants their development.     

From proteomes to complexomes in the era of systems biology

Protein complexes carry out almost the entire signaling and functional processes in the cell. The protein complex complement of a cell, and its network of complex–complex interactions, is referred to here as the complexome. Computational methods to predict protein complexes from proteomics data, resulting in network representations of complexomes, have recently being developed. In addition, key advances have been made toward understanding the network and structural organization of complexomes. We review these bioinformatics advances, and their discovery‐potential, as well as the merits of integrating proteomics data with emerging methods in systems biology to study protein complex signaling. It is envisioned that improved integration of proteomics and systems biology, incorporating the dynamics of protein complexes in space and time, may lead to more predictive models of cell signaling networks for effective modulation.     

Selective effects of gold (III) on parathyroid hormone-, prostaglandin E2- and guanine nucleotide-sensitive adenylate cyclase

Gold(III) (Au(III)) up to 0.25 microM increased parathyroid hormone- and prostaglandin E2-sensitive chick osteoblast adenylate cyclase activity without affecting 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate-stimulated enzyme activity. Au(III) at 5-50 microM inhibited hormone- and nucleotide-mediated activation of adenylate cyclase. Basal adenylate cyclase activity was not influenced by Au(III) in the given concentrations. Treatment of membranes with 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate prior to incubation with Au(III) prevented the inhibitory effect of Au(III) on adenylate cyclase. Our data suggest that Au(III) alters the response of adenylate cyclase to agonists most likely through interaction with specific sulfhydryl groups associated with the enzyme system.