ORM Expression Alters Sphingolipid Homeostasis and Differentially Affects Ceramide Synthase Activity

Sphingolipid synthesis is tightly regulated in eukaryotes. This regulation in plants ensures sufficient sphingolipids to support growth while limiting the accumulation of sphingolipid metabolites that induce programmed cell death. Serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) catalyzes the first step in sphingolipid biosynthesis and is considered the primary sphingolipid homeostatic regulatory point. In this report, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) putative SPT regulatory proteins, orosomucoid-like proteins AtORM1 and AtORM2, were found to interact physically with Arabidopsis SPT and to suppress SPT activity when coexpressed with Arabidopsis SPT subunits long-chain base1 (LCB1) and LCB2 and the small subunit of SPT in a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) SPT-deficient mutant. Consistent with a role in SPT suppression, AtORM1 and AtORM2 overexpression lines displayed increased resistance to the programmed cell death-inducing mycotoxin fumonisin B₁, with an accompanying reduced accumulation of LCBs and C16 fatty acid-containing ceramides relative to wild-type plants. Conversely, RNA interference (RNAi) suppression lines of AtORM1 and AtORM2 displayed increased sensitivity to fumonisin B₁ and an accompanying strong increase in LCBs and C16 fatty acid-containing ceramides relative to wild-type plants. Overexpression lines also were found to have reduced activity of the class I ceramide synthase that uses C16 fatty acid acyl-coenzyme A and dihydroxy LCB substrates but increased activity of class II ceramide synthases that use very-long-chain fatty acyl-coenzyme A and trihydroxy LCB substrates. RNAi suppression lines, in contrast, displayed increased class I ceramide synthase activity but reduced class II ceramide synthase activity. These findings indicate that ORM mediation of SPT activity differentially regulates functionally distinct ceramide synthase activities as part of a broader sphingolipid homeostatic regulatory network.Sphingolipids play critical roles in plant growth and development as essential components of endomembranes, including the plasma membrane, where they constitute more than 40% of the total lipid (Sperling et al., 2005; Cacas et al., 2016). Sphingolipids also are highly enriched in detergent-insoluble membrane fractions of the plasma membrane that form microdomains for proteins with important cell surface activities, including cell wall biosynthesis and hormone transport (Cacas et al., 2012, 2016; Perraki et al., 2012; Bayer et al., 2014). In addition, sphingolipids, particularly those with very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs), are integrally associated with Golgi-mediated protein trafficking that underlies processes related to the growth of plant cells (Bach et al., 2008, 2011; Markham et al., 2011; Melser et al., 2011). Furthermore, sphingolipids function through their bioactive long-chain base (LCB) and ceramide metabolites to initiate programmed cell death (PCD), important for mediating plant pathogen resistance through the hypersensitive response (Greenberg et al., 2000; Liang et al., 2003; Shi et al., 2007; Bi et al., 2014; Simanshu et al., 2014).Sphingolipid biosynthesis is highly regulated in all eukaryotes. In plants, the maintenance of sphingolipid homeostasis is vital to ensure sufficient sphingolipids for growth (Chen et al., 2006; Kimberlin et al., 2013) while restricting the accumulation of PCD-inducing ceramides and LCBs until required for processes such as the pathogen-triggered hypersensitive response. Serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT), which catalyzes the first step in LCB synthesis, is generally believed to be the primary control point for sphingolipid homeostasis (Hanada, 2003). SPT synthesizes LCBs, unique components of sphingolipids, by catalyzing a pyridoxal phosphate-dependent condensation of Ser and palmitoyl (16:0)-CoA in plants (Markham et al., 2013). Similar to other eukaryotes, the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) SPT is a heterodimer consisting of LCB1 and LCB2 subunits (Chen et al., 2006; Dietrich et al., 2008; Teng et al., 2008). Research to date has shown that SPT is regulated primarily by posttranslational mechanisms involving physical interactions with noncatalytic, membrane-associated proteins that confer positive and negative regulation of SPT activity (Han et al., 2009, 2010; Breslow et al., 2010). These proteins include a 56-amino acid small subunit of SPT (ssSPT) in Arabidopsis, which was recently shown to stimulate SPT activity and to be essential for generating sufficient amounts of sphingolipids for pollen and sporophytic cell viability (Kimberlin et al., 2013).Evidence from yeast and mammalian research points to a more critical role for proteins termed ORMs (for orosomucoid-like proteins) in sphingolipid homeostatic regulation (Breslow et al., 2010; Han et al., 2010). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Orm1p and Orm2p negatively regulate SPT through reversible phosphorylation of these polypeptides in response to intracellular sphingolipid levels (Breslow et al., 2010; Han et al., 2010; Roelants et al., 2011; Gururaj et al., 2013; Muir et al., 2014). Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of ORMs in S. cerevisiae presumably affects the higher order assembly of SPT to mediate flux through this enzyme for LCB synthesis (Breslow, 2013). In this sphingolipid homeostatic regulatory mechanism, the S. cerevisiae Orm1p and Orm2p are phosphorylated at their N termini by Ypk1, a TORC2-dependent protein kinase (Han et al., 2010; Roelants et al., 2011). The absence of this phosphorylation domain in mammalian and plant ORM homologs brings into question the nature of SPT reversible regulation by ORMs in other eukaryotic systems (Hjelmqvist et al., 2002).Sphingolipid synthesis also is mediated by the N-acylation of LCBs by ceramide synthases to form ceramides, the hydrophobic backbone of the major plant glycosphingolipids, glucosylceramide (GlcCer) and glycosyl inositolphosphoceramide (GIPC). Two functionally distinct classes of ceramide synthases occur in Arabidopsis, designated class I and class II (Chen et al., 2008). Class I ceramide synthase activity resulting from the Longevity Assurance Gene One Homolog2 (LOH2)-encoded ceramide synthase acylates, almost exclusively, LCBs containing two hydroxyl groups (dihydroxy LCBs) with 16:0-CoA to form C16 ceramides, which are used primarily for GlcCer synthesis (Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011; Luttgeharm et al., 2016). Class II ceramide synthase activities resulting from the LOH1- and LOH3-encoded ceramide synthases are most active in the acylation of LCBs containing three hydroxyl groups (trihydroxy LCBs) with VLCFA-CoAs, including primarily C₂₄ and C₂₆ acyl-CoAs (Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011; Luttgeharm et al., 2016). Class II (LOH1 and LOH3) ceramide synthase activity is essential for producing VLCFA-containing glycosphingolipids to support the growth of plant cells, whereas class I (LOH2) ceramide synthase activity is nonessential under normal growth conditions (Markham et al., 2011; Luttgeharm et al., 2015b). It was speculated recently that LOH2 ceramide synthase functions, in part, as a safety valve to acylate excess LCBs for glycosylation, resulting in a less cytotoxic form (Luttgeharm et al., 2015b; Msanne et al., 2015). Recent studies have shown that the Lag1/Lac1 components of the S. cerevisiae ceramide synthase are phosphorylated by Ypk1, and this phosphorylation stimulates ceramide synthase activity in response to heat and reduced intracellular sphingolipid levels (Muir et al., 2014). This finding points to possible coordinated regulation of ORM-mediated SPT and ceramide synthase activities to regulate sphingolipid homeostasis, which is likely more complicated in plants and mammals due to the occurrence of functionally distinct ceramide synthases in these systems (Stiban et al., 2010; Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011; Luttgeharm et al., 2016).RNA interference (RNAi) suppression of ORM genes in rice (Oryza sativa) has been shown to affect pollen viability (Chueasiri et al., 2014), but no mechanistic characterization of ORM proteins in plants has yet to be reported. Here, we describe two Arabidopsis ORMs, AtORM1 and AtORM2, that suppress SPT activity through direct interaction with the LCB1/LCB2 heterodimer. We also show that strong up-regulation of AtORM expression impairs growth. In addition, up- or down-regulation of ORMs is shown to differentially affect the sensitivity of Arabidopsis to the PCD-inducing mycotoxin fumonisin B₁ (FB₁), a ceramide synthase inhibitor, and to differentially affect the activities of class I and II ceramide synthases as a possible additional mechanism for regulating sphingolipid homeostasis.     

Acoustic sequences in non‐human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus

Animal acoustic communication often takes the form of complex sequences, made up of multiple distinct acoustic units. Apart from the well‐known example of birdsong, other animals such as insects, amphibians, and mammals (including bats, rodents, primates, and cetaceans) also generate complex acoustic sequences. Occasionally, such as with birdsong, the adaptive role of these sequences seems clear (e.g. mate attraction and territorial defence). More often however, researchers have only begun to characterise – let alone understand – the significance and meaning of acoustic sequences. Hypotheses abound, but there is little agreement as to how sequences should be defined and analysed. Our review aims to outline suitable methods for testing these hypotheses, and to describe the major limitations to our current and near‐future knowledge on questions of acoustic sequences. This review and prospectus is the result of a collaborative effort between 43 scientists from the fields of animal behaviour, ecology and evolution, signal processing, machine learning, quantitative linguistics, and information theory, who gathered for a 2013 workshop entitled, ‘Analysing vocal sequences in animals’. Our goal is to present not just a review of the state of the art, but to propose a methodological framework that summarises what we suggest are the best practices for research in this field, across taxa and across disciplines. We also provide a tutorial‐style introduction to some of the most promising algorithmic approaches for analysing sequences. We divide our review into three sections: identifying the distinct units of an acoustic sequence, describing the different ways that information can be contained within a sequence, and analysing the structure of that sequence. Each of these sections is further subdivided to address the key questions and approaches in that area. We propose a uniform, systematic, and comprehensive approach to studying sequences, with the goal of clarifying research terms used in different fields, and facilitating collaboration and comparative studies. Allowing greater interdisciplinary collaboration will facilitate the investigation of many important questions in the evolution of communication and sociality.     

Kallikrein 5 inhibitors identified through structure based drug design in search for a treatment for Netherton Syndrome

Netherton syndrome (NS) is a rare and debilitating severe autosomal recessive genetic skin disease with high mortality rates particularly in neonates. NS is caused by loss-of-function SPINK5 mutations leading to unregulated kallikrein 5 (KLK5) and kallikrein 7 (KLK7) activity. Furthermore, KLK5 inhibition has been proposed as a potential therapeutic treatment for NS. Identification of potent and selective KLK5 inhibitors would enable further exploration of the disease biology and could ultimately lead to a treatment for NS. This publication describes how fragmentation of known trypsin-like serine protease (TLSP) inhibitors resulted in the identification of a series of phenolic amidine-based KLK5 inhibitors 1. X-ray crystallography was used to find alternatives to the phenol interaction leading to identification of carbonyl analogues such as lactam 13 and benzimidazole 15. These reversible inhibitors, with selectivity over KLK1 (10–100 fold), provided novel starting points for the guided growth towards suitable tool molecules for the exploration of KLK5 biology.     

Unraveling the Nexus: Exploring the Pathways to Combined Resource Use

In response to the unprecedented decline in global natural resource endowments, the so‐called nexus framework is gaining increasing influence on resource management practices. In this research, we approach the resource nexus through the concept of nexus pathways. Nexus pathways are configurations that resource flows follow along supply chains leading to the combined use of two or more resources. Three general types of pathways are identified: direct (on‐site use), dependent (one‐way supply chains), and interdependent (supply‐chain feedbacks). We quantify and compare each pathway by means of multiregional input‐output analysis and structural path analysis, and apply this approach to a comparative case study on the water‐energy nexus (WEN) in the United States and China. Interdependencies or feedbacks are generally thought to be relevant for the WEN, especially between water and energy sectors. Our economy‐wide analysis for both countries indicates, however, that feedbacks neither play an important role in the WEN nor substantially take place between water and energy sectors. The most important feedbacks contribute to less than 1% of total resource use, and these take place mostly between manufacturing sectors. Overall, the studied WEN is mostly driven by dependent pathways and, to a lesser degree, direct resource use. Comparative differences between the two countries are largely explained by differences in economic structure, technology, and resource endowments. Our findings call into question current research and policy focus and suggest greater attention to less complex, but more determining, pathways leading to absolute resource use.     

Interactive Visualization and Industrial Ecology: Applications,Challenges, and Opportunities

The emergence of increasingly complex data in industrial ecology (IE) has caused scholarly interest in interactive visualization (IV). IV allows users to interact with data, aiding in processing and interpreting complex datasets, processes, and simulations. Consequently, IV can help IE practitioners communicate the complexities of their methods and results, shed light on the underlying research assumptions, and enable more transparent monitoring of data quality and error. This can significantly increase the reach and impact of research, promote transparency, reproducibility, and open science, as well as improve the clarity and presentation of IE research. A review of current IV applications reveals that, while data exploration has received some attention among IE practitioners, IV applications in scientific communication are clearly lacking. With the help of a working example, we explore the value of IV, discuss its operationalization, and highlight challenges that the IE community must face during IV uptake. Such challenges include technical and knowledge limitations, limits on user interaction, and implementation strategies. With these challenges in mind, we outline key aspects needed to lift the IE field to the forefront of scientific communication in the coming years. Among these, we draft the basic principles of a “Hub for Interactive Visualization in Industrial Ecology” (HIVE), a point of encounter where IE practitioners could find an array of data visualization tools that are geared toward IE datasets. IV is here to stay, and its inceptive stage presents many opportunities to IE practitioners to shape its operationalization and benefit from early adoption.