Morning melatonin has limited benefit as a soporific for daytime sleep after night work

Exogenous melatonin administration in humans is known to exert both chronobiotic (phase shifting) and soporific effects. In a previous study in our lab, young, healthy, subjects worked five consecutive simulated night shifts (23:00 to 07:00 h) and slept during the day (08:30 to 15:30 h). Large phase delays of various magnitudes were produced by the study interventions, which included bright light exposure during the night shifts, as assessed by the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) before (baseline) and after (final) the five night shifts. Subjects also ingested either 1.8 mg sustained-release melatonin or placebo before daytime sleep. Although melatonin at this time should delay the circadian clock, this previous study found that it did not increase the magnitude of phase delays. To determine whether melatonin had a soporific effect, we controlled the various magnitudes of phase delay produced by the other study interventions. Melatonin (n=18) and placebo (n=18) groups were formed by matching a melatonin participant with a placebo participant that had a similar baseline and final DLMO (±1 h). Sleep log measurements of total sleep time (TST) and actigraphic measurements of sleep latency, TST, and three movement indices for the two groups were examined. Although melatonin was associated with small improvements in sleep quality and quantity, the differences were not statistically significant by analysis of variance. However, binomial analysis indicated that melatonin participants were more likely to sleep better than their placebo counterparts on some days with some measures. It was concluded that, the soporific effect of melatonin is small when administered prior to 7 h daytime sleep periods following night shift work.     

Insolubilized amylases

Carrier-bound immobilized α-amylases and glucoamylase have been obtained by photopolymerizing aqueous solutions containing acrylamide, a crosslinking monomer, an enzyme-reactive monomer, an oxygen scavenger, and amylase, and allowing the amylase to react with the entrapping enzyme-reactive gel matrix evolved. Partial starch hydrolyzates (28 DE corn starch syrup) have been continuously converted to 90–94% dextrose syrups in columns packed with immobilized amylases. The enzymatic heat stability of immobilized glucoamylase gels is discussed.     

The Temporal Relationship between Protein Phosphatase, Mitochondrial CytochromecRelease, and Caspase Activation in Apoptosis

Apoptosis is mediated by members of the caspase family of proteases which can be activated by release of mitochondrial cytochromec.Additional members of the caspase family are activated at the cell surface in response to direct stimulus from the external environment such as by activation of the Fas receptor. It has been suggested that these upstream caspases directly activate the downstream caspases which would obviate a role for cytochromecin apoptosis induced by the Fas receptor. We demonstrate that cytochromecis released from mitochondria of Jurkat cells in response to both staurosporine and an agonistic anti-Fas antibody and that only the latter is inhibited by the caspase inhibitor z-VAD-FMK. This suggests that an upstream caspase such as caspase-8 is required for the Fas-mediated release of mitochondrial cytochromec.The protein phosphatase inhibitor calyculin A prevented cytochromecrelease and apoptosis induced by both agents, suggesting that release of cytochromecis required in both models. Zinc, once thought of as an endonuclease inhibitor, has previously been shown to prevent the activation of caspase-3. We show that zinc prevents the activation of downstream caspases and apoptosis induced by both insults, yet does not prevent release of mitochondrial cytochromec.The ability of calyculin A and zinc to prevent DNA digestion implies that the mitochondrial pathway is important for induction of apoptosis by both agents. These results do not support an alternative pathway in which caspase-8 directly activates caspase-3. These results also demonstrate that a critical protein phosphatase regulates the release of cytochromecand apoptosis induced by both insults.     

Expedited SAR study of an mGluR5 antagonists: generation of a focused library using a solution-phase Suzuki coupling methodology

The SAR of the lead compounds 2a and 2b was rapidly explored. Utilizing a parallel solution-phase Suzuki coupling approach, in tandem with strong cation exchange resin (SCX) purification afforded the desired focused library. The library was evaluated in vitro, a ninefold potency increase was achieved and the preference for ortho substitution of moderate steric bulk of the fourth, phenyl ring was identified. In addition, dimethylisoxazole, as a heterocyclic replacement for the phenylic ring of the lead compound, was also identified by this approach.     

Human beta-defensin 3 binds to hemagglutinin B (rHagB), a non-fimbrial adhesin from Porphyromonas gingivalis, and attenuates a pro-inflammatory cytokine response

Regulatory mechanisms in mucosal secretions and tissues recognize antigens and attenuate pro-inflammatory cytokine responses. Here, we asked whether human beta-defensin 3 (HBD3) serves as an upstream suppressor of cytokine signaling that binds and attenuates pro-inflammatory cytokine responses to recombinant hemagglutinin B (rHagB), a non-fimbrial adhesin from Porphyromonas gingivalis strain 381. We found that HBD3 binds to immobilized rHagB and produces a significantly higher resonance unit signal in surface plasmon resonance spectroscopic analysis, than HBD2 and HBD1 that are used as control defensins. Furthermore, we found that HBD3 significantly attenuates (P<0.05) the interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and tumor-necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) responses induced by rHagB in human myeloid dendritic cell culture supernatants and the extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK 1/2) response in human myeloid dendritic cell lysates. Thus, HBD3 binds rHagB and this interaction may be an important initial step to attenuate a pro-inflammatory cytokine response and an ERK 1/2 response.     

Dual sources of vitronectin in the human lower urinary tract: synthesis by urothelium vs. extravasation from the bloodstream

Vitronectin (VN), secreted into the bloodstream by liver hepatocytes, is known to anchor epithelial cells to basement membranes through interactions with cell surface integrin receptors. We report here that VN is also synthesized by urothelial cells of urothelium in vivo and in vitro. In situ hybridization, dideoxy sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and ELISA of urothelial cell mRNA, cDNA, tissue, and protein extracts demonstrated that the VN gene is active in vivo and in vitro. The expression of VN by urothelium is hypothesized to constitute one of several pathways that anchor basal cells to an underlying substratum and explains why urothelial cells adhere to glass and propagate under serum-free conditions. Therefore, two sources of VN in the human urinary bladder are recognized: 1) localized synthesis by urothelial cells and 2) extravasation of liver VN through fenestrated capillaries. When human plasma was fractionated by denaturing heparin affinity chromatography, VN was isolated in a biologically active form that supported rapid spreading of urothelial cells in vitro under serum-free conditions. This activity was inhibited by the matricellular protein SPARC via direct binding of VN to SPARC through a Ca(+2)-dependent mechanism. A novel form of VN, isolated from the same heparin affinity chromatography column and designated as the VN(c) chromatomer, also supported cell spreading but failed to interact with SPARC. Therefore, the steady-state balance among urothelial cells, their extracellular milieu, and matricellular proteins constitutes a principal mechanism by which urothelia are anchored to an underlying substrata in the face of constant bladder cycling.     

Failure of extraocular light to facilitate circadian rhythm reentrainment in humans

Although extraocular light can entrain the circadian rhythms of invertebrates and nonmammalian vertebrates, almost all studies show that the mammalian circadian system can only be affected by light to the eyes. The exception is a recent study by Campbell and Murphy that reported phase shifts in humans to bright light applied with fiber-optic pads behind the knees (popliteal region). We tested whether this extraocular light stimulus could accelerate the entrainment of circadian rhythms to a shift of the sleep schedule, as occurs in shift work or jet lag. In experiment 1, the sleep/dark episodes were delayed 8h from baseline for 2 days, and 3h light exposures were timed to occur before the temperature minimum to help delay circadian rhythms. There were three groups: (1) bright (about 13,000 lux) extraocular light from fiber-optic pads, (2) control (dim light, 10-20 lux), and (3) medium-intensity (about 1000 lux) ocular light from light boxes. In experiment 2, the sleep/dark episodes were inverted, and extraocular light was applied either before the temperature minimum to help delay circadian rhythms or after the temperature minimum to help advance rhythms. Circadian phase markers were the salivary dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and the rectal temperature minimum. There was no evidence that the popliteal extraocular light had a phase-shifting effect in either experiment. Possible reasons for phase shifts in the Campbell and Murphy study and not the current study include the many differences between the protocols. In the current study, there was substantial sleep deprivation before the extraocular light was applied. There was a large shift in the sleep/dark schedule, rather than allowing subjects to sleep each day from midnight to noon, as in the Campbell and Murphy study. Also, when extraocular light was applied in the current protocol, subjects did not experience a change from sleeping to awake, a change in posture (from lying in bed to sitting in a chair), or a change in ocular light (from dark to dim light). Further research is necessary to determine the conditions under which extraocular light might produce phase shifts in human circadian rhythms. (Chronobiology International, 17(6), 807-826, 2000).