A previously found thylakoid membrane protein of 14kDa (TMP14) is a novel subunit of plant photosystem I and is designated PSI-P

We show that the thylakoid membrane phosphoprotein TMP14 is a novel subunit of plant photosystem I (PSI). Blue native/SDS-PAGE and sucrose gradient fractionation demonstrated the association of the protein exclusively with PSI. We designate the protein PSI-P. The presence of PSI-P subunit in Arabidopsis mutants lacking other PSI subunits was analyzed and suggested a location in the proximity of PSI-L, -H and -O subunits. The PSI-P protein was not differentially phosphorylated in state 1 and state 2.     

Changes of amino acid sequence in PEST-like area and QEEET motif affect degradation rate of D1 polypeptide in photosystem II

The degradation rate of the D1 polypeptide was measured in threeSynechocystis PCC 6803 mutantsin vivo. Mutations were introduced into a putative cleavage area of the D1 polypeptide (QEEET motif) and into the PEST-like area. PEST sequences are often found in proteins with a high turnover rate. The QEEET-motif mutants are CA1 [(E242-E244);Q241H] and E243K, and the third mutation, E229D, was directed to the PEST-like area. During high-light illumination (1500 mol photons m^-2s^-1) that induced photoinhibition of photosystem II (PSII), the half-life time of the D1 polypeptide in mutant E229D (t _1/2=35 min) was about twice as long as in AR (control strain) cells (t _1/2=19 min). In growth light (40 mol photons m^-2s^-1), the degradation rate of the D1 polypeptide in E229D and AR strains was the same (t _1/25 h). In growth light the D1 polypeptide was degraded faster in both QEEET-motif mutants than in the AR strain, but in photoinhibitory light the degradation rates were similar. According to these results, the highly conservative QEEET motif as such is not required for the proteolytic cut of the D1 polypeptide, but it does affect the rate of degradation. No simple correlation existed between the degradation rate of the D1 polypeptide and the susceptibility of PSII to photoinhibition in mutant and AR cells under our experimental conditions.     

Protection against activated oxygen following re-aeration of hypoxically pretreated wheat roots. The response of the glutathione system

This paper shows the effects of re-aeration on the glutathionepool following a prolonged period of root hypoxia. An increased content of total glutathione has been measuredin roots of wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Alcedo),grown in a nitrogen-flushed nutrient solution (HI) with theirshoots in air compared with roots of aerobically grown plants(C). Re-aeration of hypoxically pretreated roots causes oxidativeinjury indicated by the oxidation of reduced glutathione (GSH),decrease of total thiol-groups and increased formation of TBAreactive material (lipid peroxidation). Re-admission of oxygen results in a 50% rise in oxygen uptakeover the whole 16 h re-aeration period compared with the control.During this time the overall glutathione pool of HI treatmentincreases to almost double that of the control, essentiallyreflected in the amount of oxidized glutathione (GSSG). Hypoxically pretreated roots showed lower glutathione reductaseactivity (GR) than the control. Immediately following re-aerationthe activity was further decreased to a limiting value whichseems to prevent full reduction of the newly formed glutathione.Therefore, the capacity to reduce the GSSG pool is below thecapacity for net glutathione synthesis. This results in a declineof the GSH/GSSG ratio which reflects oxidative stress. The enzymeactivity recovers slowly after re-aeration exceeding the valuesof aerobically grown roots only after 16 h correlating witha high reduction state of the glutathione pool. Copper, known to induce the formation of reactive oxygen species,strengthened the effect of re-aeration and enhanced the post-anoxicinjury irreversibly. The importance of the glutathione system in roots to cope withvarying oxygen tension is discussed. Key words: Hypoxia, re-aeration, glutathione system, glutathione reductase, wheat     

Isolation and characterization of thylakoid membranes from the filamentous cyanobacterium Nostoc punctiforme

Nostoc   punctiforme strain Pasteur Culture Collection (PCC) 73102, a sequenced filamentous cyanobacterium capable of nitrogen fixation, is used as a model organism for characterization of bioenergetic processes during nitrogen fixation in Nostoc . A protocol for isolating thylakoid membranes was developed to examine the biochemical and biophysical aspects of photosynthetic electron transfer. Thylakoids were isolated from filaments of N.   punctiforme by pneumatic pressure-drop lysis. The activity of photosynthetic enzymes in the isolated thylakoids was analysed by measuring oxygen evolution activity, fluorescence spectroscopy and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Electron transfer was found functional in both PSII and PSI. Electron transfer measurements in PSII, using diphenylcarbazide as electron donor and 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol as electron acceptor, showed that 80% of the PSII centres were active in water oxidation in the final membrane preparation. Analysis of the membrane protein complexes was made by 2D gel electrophoresis, and identification of representative proteins was made by mass spectrometry. The ATP synthase, several oligomers of PSI, PSII and the NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (NDH)-1L and NDH-1M complexes, were all found in the gels. Some differences were noted compared with previous results from Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Two oligomers of PSII were found, monomeric and dimeric forms, but no CP43-less complexes. Both dimeric and monomeric forms of Cyt b ₆/ f could be observed. In all, 28 different proteins were identified, of which 25 are transmembrane proteins or membrane associated ones.     

Role of Thylakoid ATP/ADP Carrier in Photoinhibition and Photoprotection of Photosystem II in Arabidopsis

The chloroplast thylakoid ATP/ADP carrier (TAAC) belongs to the mitochondrial carrier superfamily and supplies the thylakoid lumen with stromal ATP in exchange for ADP. Here, we investigate the physiological consequences of TAAC depletion in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). We show that the deficiency of TAAC in two T-DNA insertion lines does not modify the chloroplast ultrastructure, the relative amounts of photosynthetic proteins, the pigment composition, and the photosynthetic activity. Under growth light conditions, the mutants initially displayed similar shoot weight, but lower when reaching full development, and were less tolerant to high light conditions in comparison with the wild type. These observations prompted us to study in more detail the effects of TAAC depletion on photoinhibition and photoprotection of the photosystem II (PSII) complex. The steady-state phosphorylation levels of PSII proteins were not affected, but the degradation of the reaction center II D1 protein was blocked, and decreased amounts of CP43-less PSII monomers were detected in the mutants. Besides this, the mutant leaves displayed a transiently higher nonphotochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence than the wild-type leaves, especially at low light. This may be attributed to the accumulation in the absence of TAAC of a higher electrochemical H⁺ gradient in the first minutes of illumination, which more efficiently activates photoprotective xanthophyll cycle-dependent and independent mechanisms. Based on these results, we propose that TAAC plays a critical role in the disassembly steps during PSII repair and in addition may balance the trans-thylakoid electrochemical H⁺ gradient storage.In plants, the chloroplast thylakoid membrane is the site of light-driven photosynthetic reactions coupled to ATP synthesis. There are four major protein complexes involved in these reactions, namely, PSI, PSII, the cytochrome b₆f, and the H⁺-translocating ATP synthase (for review, see Nelson and Ben-Shem, 2004). The photosystems and the cytochrome b₆f complex also contain redox components and pigments bound to protein subunits. Their synthesis, assembly, optimal function, and repair during normal development and stress require a number of transport and regulatory mechanisms. In this context, the water-oxidizing PSII complex composed of more than 25 integral and peripheral proteins attracts special attention since its reaction center D1 subunit is degraded and replaced much faster than the other subunits under excess and even growth light conditions (for review, see Aro et al., 2005). Thus, the D1 protein turnover is the major event in the repair cycle of the PSII complex and occurs subsequently to the inactivation of PSII electron transport. D1 degradation is most likely performed by thylakoid FtsH and Deg proteases, operating on both sides of the thylakoid membrane (Lindahl et al., 2000; Haussühl et al., 2001; Silva et al., 2003; Kapri-Pardes et al., 2007). The PSII repair cycle is regulated by reversible phosphorylation of several core subunits (Tikkanen et al., 2008).ATP is produced as a result of the light-driven photosynthetic reactions in the thylakoid membrane and mainly is utilized in the carbon fixation reactions occurring in the soluble stroma. Besides this, ATP also drives several energy-dependent processes occurring on the stromal side of the thylakoid membrane, including phosphorylation, folding, import, and degradation of proteins. Furthermore, experimental evidence for ATP transport across the thylakoid membrane and nucleotide metabolism inside the lumenal space has been reported (Spetea et al., 2004; for review, see Spetea and Thuswaldner, 2008; Spetea and Schoefs, 2010). The protein responsible for the thylakoid ATP transport activity has been identified in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) as the product of the At5g01500 gene and functionally characterized in Escherichia coli as an ATP/ADP exchanger (Thuswaldner et al., 2007). This protein is homologous to the extensively studied bovine mitochondrial ADP/ATP carrier and therefore has been named thylakoid ATP/ADP carrier (TAAC). In the same report, it has been demonstrated that TAAC transports ATP from stroma to lumen in exchange for ADP, as based on radioactive assays using thylakoids isolated from Arabidopsis wild-type plants and a T-DNA insertion knockout line (named taac). Furthermore, TAAC was shown to be mainly expressed in photosynthetic tissues with an up-regulation during greening, senescence, and stress (e.g. high light) conditions, implying a physiological role during thylakoid biogenesis and turnover.The ATP translocated by TAAC across the thylakoid membrane is converted to GTP by the lumenal nucleoside diphosphate kinase III; GTP can then be bound and hydrolyzed to GDP and inorganic phosphate by the PsbO protein, a lumenal extrinsic subunit of the PSII complex (Spetea et al., 2004; Lundin et al., 2007a). The anion transporter 1 from Arabidopsis has been proposed to export to the stroma the phosphate generated during nucleotide metabolism in the thylakoid lumen (Ruiz Pavón et al., 2008). Between the two PsbO isoforms in Arabidopsis, it has recently been reported that PsbO2 plays an essential role in D1 protein turnover during high light stress and that it has a higher GTPase activity than PsbO1 (Lundin et al., 2007b, 2008; Allahverdiyeva et al., 2009). The precise mechanism of PsbO2-mediated PSII repair is not known. Nevertheless, the requirement of GTP for efficient proteolytic removal of the D1 protein during repair of photoinactivated PSII was previously reported (Spetea et al., 1999). Furthermore, it has been proposed that the PsbO2 type of PSII complexes undergo more efficient repair. This has been attributed to the PsbO2-mediated GTPase activity that induces PsbO2 release from the complex, thus facilitating the next steps in the repair process, namely, dissociation of the CP43 subunit and proteolysis of the D1 subunit (Lundin et al., 2007b, 2008).TAAC may represent the missing link between ATP synthesis on the stromal side of the thylakoid membrane and nucleotide-dependent reactions in the lumenal space. The taac mutant provides an interesting tool to study whether there are any regulatory networks between the activity of TAAC and PSII repair. Based on phenotypic characterization of two different T-DNA insertion lines of the TAAC gene, we report in this article that the PSII repair cycle is malfunctioning in the absence of TAAC and that the thermal photoprotection is faster activated during light stress.     

Steady-State Phosphorylation of Light-Harvesting Complex II Proteins Preserves Photosystem I under Fluctuating White Light

According to the “state transitions” theory, the light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) phosphorylation in plant chloroplasts is essential to adjust the relative absorption cross section of photosystem II (PSII) and PSI upon changes in light quality. The role of LHCII phosphorylation upon changes in light intensity is less thoroughly investigated, particularly when changes in light intensity are too fast to allow the phosphorylation/dephosphorylation processes to occur. Here, we demonstrate that the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) stn7 (for state transition7) mutant, devoid of the STN7 kinase and LHCII phosphorylation, shows a growth penalty only under fluctuating white light due to a low amount of PSI. Under constant growth light conditions, stn7 acquires chloroplast redox homeostasis by increasing the relative amount of PSI centers. Thus, in plant chloroplasts, the steady-state LHCII phosphorylation plays a major role in preserving PSI upon rapid fluctuations in white light intensity. Such protection of PSI results from LHCII phosphorylation-dependent equal distribution of excitation energy to both PSII and PSI from the shared LHCII antenna and occurs in cooperation with nonphotochemical quenching and the proton gradient regulation5-dependent control of electron flow, which are likewise strictly regulated by white light intensity. LHCII phosphorylation is concluded to function both as a stabilizer (in time scales of seconds to minutes) and a dynamic regulator (in time scales from tens of minutes to hours and days) of redox homeostasis in chloroplasts, subject to modifications by both environmental and metabolic cues. Exceeding the capacity of LHCII phosphorylation/dephosphorylation to balance the distribution of excitation energy between PSII and PSI results in readjustment of photosystem stoichiometry.Plant acclimation to different quantities and qualities of light has been extensively investigated. The light quality experiments have usually concerned the red/blue and far-red light acclimation strategies, which have been closely related to the state transitions and the phosphorylation of the light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) proteins, Lhcb1 and Lhcb2, by the state transition7 (STN7) kinase (Allen, 2003; Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Tikkanen et al., 2006; Rochaix, 2007). Such studies on acclimation to different qualities of light have uncovered key mechanisms required for the maintenance of photosynthetic efficiency in dense populations and canopies (Dietzel et al., 2008). However, the role of LHCII phosphorylation under fluctuations in the quantity of white light has been scarcely investigated. Light conditions in natural environments may be very complex with respect to the quantity of white light, which constantly fluctuates both in short- and long-term durations (Smith, 1982; Külheim et al., 2002). Thus, the acclimation strategies to natural environments must concomitantly meet the challenges of both high- and low-light acclimation. Changing cloudiness, for example, would initiate both the high-light and low-light acclimation signals in the time scale of minutes and hours, whereas the movements of leaves in the wind or the rapid movement of clouds would initiate even more frequent light acclimation signals. The kinetics of reversible LHCII phosphorylation is far too slow to cope with rapid environmental changes.The phosphorylation level of LHCII proteins in the thylakoid membrane is regulated by both the STN7 kinase and the counteracting PPH1/TAP38 phosphatase (Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010). No definite results are available about regulation of the PPH1/TAP38 phosphatase, but the STN7 kinase is strongly under redox regulation (Lemeille et al., 2009) and controls the phosphorylation level of LHCII proteins under varying white light intensities as well as according to chloroplast metabolic cues, as described already decades ago (Fernyhough et al., 1983; Rintamäki et al., 2000; Hou et al., 2003). So far, research on the role of the STN7 kinase and LHCII phosphorylation in the light acclimation of higher plants has heavily focused on reversible LHCII phosphorylation and concomitant state transitions. The state 1-to-state 2 transition, by definition, means the phosphorylation of LHCII proteins, their detachment from PSII in grana membranes, and migration to the stroma membranes to serve in the collection of excitation energy to PSI (Fork and Satoh, 1986; Williams and Allen, 1987; Wollman, 2001; Rochaix, 2007; Kargul and Barber, 2008; Murata, 2009; Lemeille et al., 2010; Minagawa, 2011). Concomitantly, the absorption cross section of PSII decreases and that of PSI increases (Canaani and Malkin, 1984; Malkin et al., 1986; Ruban and Johnson, 2009). Indeed, state transitions have been well documented when different qualities (blue/red and far red) of light, preferentially exciting either PSII or PSI, have been applied.Different from state transitions, the white light intensity-dependent reversible LHCII phosphorylation does not result in differential excitation of the two photosystems (Tikkanen et al., 2010). Instead, both photosystems remain nearly equally excited independently whether the LHCII proteins are heavily phosphorylated or strongly dephosphorylated. Moreover, it is worth noting that the different qualities of light generally used to induce reversible LHCII phosphorylation and state transitions (blue/red and far-red lights) have usually been of very low intensity (for review, see Haldrup et al., 2001), and apparently, minimal protonation of the lumen takes place under such illumination conditions. Yet another difference between induction of LHCII protein phosphorylation by different qualities of light or different quantities of white light concerns the concomitant induction of PSII core protein phosphorylation. In the former case, the level of PSII core protein phosphorylation follows the phosphorylation pattern of LHCII proteins, whereas under different quantities of white light, the phosphorylation behavior of PSII core and LHCII proteins is the opposite (Tikkanen et al., 2008b).To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the physiological role of white light-induced changes in LHCII protein phosphorylation, we have integrated Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) LHCII phosphorylation with other light-dependent regulatory modifications of light harvesting and electron transfer in the thylakoid membrane, which include the nonphotochemical quenching of excitation energy (for review, see Niyogi, 1999; Horton and Ruban, 2005; Barros and Kühlbrandt, 2009; de Bianchi et al., 2010; Jahns and Holzwarth, 2012; Ruban et al., 2012) and the photosynthetic control of electron transfer by the cytochrome b₆f (Cytb6f) complex (Rumberg and Siggel, 1969; Witt, 1979; Tikhonov et al., 1981; Bendall, 1982; Nishio and Whitmarsh, 1993; Joliot and Johnson, 2011; Suorsa et al., 2012; for review, see Foyer et al., 1990, 2012), both strongly dependent on lumenal protonation.It is demonstrated that the steady-state LHCII phosphorylation is particularly important under rapidly fluctuating light (FL) conditions. This ensures equal energy distribution to both photosystems, prevents the accumulation of electrons in the intersystem electron transfer chain (ETC), eliminates perturbations in chloroplast redox balance, and maintains PSI functionality upon rapid fluctuations in white light intensity.     

Modulation of photosynthetic electron transport in the absence of terminal electron acceptors: Characterization of the rbcL deletion mutant of tobacco

Tobacco rbcL deletion mutant, which lacks the key enzyme Rubisco for photosynthetic carbon assimilation, was characterized with respect to thylakoid functional properties and protein composition. The ΔrbcL plants showed an enhanced capacity for dissipation of light energy by non-photochemical quenching which was accompanied by low photochemical quenching and low overall photosynthetic electron transport rate. Flash-induced fluorescence relaxation and thermoluminescence measurements revealed a slow electron transfer and decreased redox gap between Q_A and Q_B, whereas the donor side function of the Photosystem II (PSII) complex was not affected. The 77 K fluorescence emission spectrum of ΔrbcL plant thylakoids implied a presence of free light harvesting complexes. Mutant plants also had a low amount of photooxidisible P700 and an increased ratio of PSII to Photosystem I (PSI). On the other hand, an elevated level of plastid terminal oxidase and the lack of F₀ ‘dark rise’ in fluorescence measurements suggest an enhanced plastid terminal oxidase-mediated electron flow to O₂ in ΔrbcL thylakoids. Modified electron transfer routes together with flexible dissipation of excitation energy through PSII probably have a crucial role in protection of PSI from irreversible protein damage in the ΔrbcL mutant under growth conditions. This protective capacity was rapidly exceeded in ΔrbcL mutant when the light level was elevated resulting in severe degradation of PSI complexes.     

Plants Actively Avoid State Transitions upon Changes in Light Intensity: Role of Light-Harvesting Complex II Protein Dephosphorylation in High Light

Photosystem II (PSII) core and light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) proteins in plant chloroplasts undergo reversible phosphorylation upon changes in light intensity (being under control of redox-regulated STN7 and STN8 kinases and TAP38/PPH1 and PSII core phosphatases). Shift of plants from growth light to high light results in an increase of PSII core phosphorylation, whereas LHCII phosphorylation concomitantly decreases. Exactly the opposite takes place when plants are shifted to lower light intensity. Despite distinct changes occurring in thylakoid protein phosphorylation upon light intensity changes, the excitation balance between PSII and photosystem I remains unchanged. This differs drastically from the canonical-state transition model induced by artificial states 1 and 2 lights that concomitantly either dephosphorylate or phosphorylate, respectively, both the PSII core and LHCII phosphoproteins. Analysis of the kinase and phosphatase mutants revealed that TAP38/PPH1 phosphatase is crucial in preventing state transition upon increase in light intensity. Indeed, tap38/pph1 mutant revealed strong concomitant phosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII proteins upon transfer to high light, thus resembling the wild type under state 2 light. Coordinated function of thylakoid protein kinases and phosphatases is shown to secure balanced excitation energy for both photosystems by preventing state transitions upon changes in light intensity. Moreover, PROTON GRADIENT REGULATION5 (PGR5) is required for proper regulation of thylakoid protein kinases and phosphatases, and the pgr5 mutant mimics phenotypes of tap38/pph1. This shows that there is a close cooperation between the redox- and proton gradient-dependent regulatory mechanisms for proper function of the photosynthetic machinery.Photosynthetic light reactions take place in the chloroplast thylakoid membrane. Primary energy conversion reactions are performed by synchronized function of the two light energy-driven enzymes PSII and PSI. PSII uses excitation energy to split water into electrons and protons. PSII feeds electrons to the intersystem electron transfer chain (ETC) consisting of plastoquinone, cytochrome b₆f, and plastocyanin. PSI oxidizes the ETC in a light-driven reduction of NADP to NADPH. Light energy is collected by the light-harvesting antenna systems in the thylakoid membrane composed of specific pigment-protein complexes (light-harvesting complex I [LHCI] and LHCII). The majority of the light-absorbing pigments are bound to LHCII trimers that can serve the light harvesting of both photosystems (Galka et al., 2012; Kouřil et al., 2013; Wientjes et al., 2013b). Energy distribution from LHCII is regulated by protein phosphorylation (Bennett, 1979; Bennett et al., 1980; Allen et al., 1981) under control of the STN7 and STN8 kinases (Depège et al., 2003; Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Vainonen et al., 2005) and the TAP38/PPH1 and Photosystem II Core Phosphatase (PBCP) phosphatases (Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010; Samol et al., 2012). LHCII trimers are composed of LHCB1, LHCB2, and LHCB3 proteins, and in addition to reversible phosphorylation of LHCB1 and LHCB2, the protein composition of the LHCII trimers also affects the energy distribution from the light-harvesting system to photosystems (Damkjaer et al., 2009; Pietrzykowska et al., 2014). Most of the LHCII trimers are located in the PSII-rich grana membranes and PSII- and PSI-rich grana margins of the thylakoid membrane, and only a minor fraction resides in PSI- and ATP synthase-rich stroma lamellae (Tikkanen et al., 2008b; Suorsa et al., 2014). Both photosystems bind a small amount of LHCII trimers in biochemically isolatable PSII-LHCII and PSI-LHCII complexes (Pesaresi et al., 2009; Järvi et al., 2011; Caffarri et al., 2014). The large portion of the LHCII, however, does not form isolatable complexes with PSII or PSI, and therefore, it separates as free LHCII trimers upon biochemical fractionation of the thylakoid membrane by Suc gradient centrifugation or in native gel analyses (Caffarri et al., 2009; Järvi et al., 2011), the amount being dependent on the thylakoid isolation method. Nonetheless, in vivo, this major LHCII antenna fraction serves the light-harvesting function. This is based on the fact that fluorescence from free LHCII, peaking at 680 nm in 77-K fluorescence emission spectra, can only be detected when the energy transfer properties of the thylakoid membrane are disturbed by detergents (Grieco et al., 2015).Regulation of excitation energy distribution from LHCII to PSII and PSI has, for decades, been linked to LHCII phosphorylation and state transitions (Bennett, 1979; Bennett et al., 1980; Allen et al., 1981). It has been explained that a fraction of LHCII gets phosphorylated and migrates from PSII to PSI, which can be evidenced as increase in PSI cross section and was assigned as transition to state 2 (for review, see Allen, 2003; Rochaix et al., 2012). The LHCII proteins are, however, phosphorylated all over the thylakoid membrane (i.e. in the PSII- and LHCII-rich grana core) in grana margins containing PSII, LHCII, and PSI as well as in PSI-rich stroma lamellae also harboring PSII-LHCII, LHCII, and PSI-LHCII complexes in minor amounts (Tikkanen et al., 2008b; Grieco et al., 2012; Leoni et al., 2013; Wientjes et al., 2013a)—making the canonical-state transition theory inadequate to explain the physiological role of reversible LHCII phosphorylation (Tikkanen and Aro, 2014). Moreover, the traditional-state transition model is based on lateral segregation of PSII-LHCII and PSI-LHCI to different thylakoid domains. It, however, seems likely that PSII and PSI are energetically connected through a shared light-harvesting system composed of LHCII trimers (Grieco et al., 2015), and there is efficient excitation energy transfer between the two photosystems (Yokono et al., 2015). Nevertheless, it is clear that LHCII phosphorylation is a prerequisite to form an isolatable PSI-LHCII complex called the state transition complex (Pesaresi et al., 2009; Järvi et al., 2011). Existence of a minor state transition complex, however, does not explain why LHCII is phosphorylated all over the thylakoid membrane and how the energy transfer is regulated from the majority of LHCII antenna that is shared between PSII and PSI but does not form isolatable complexes with them (Grieco et al., 2015).Plants grown under any steady-state white light condition show the following characteristics of the thylakoid membrane: PSII core and LHCII phosphoproteins are moderately phosphorylated, phosphorylation takes place all over the thylakoid membrane, and the PSI-LHCII state transition complex is present (Järvi et al., 2011; Grieco et al., 2012; Wientjes et al., 2013b). Upon changes in the light intensity, the relative phosphorylation level between PSII core and LHCII phosphoproteins drastically changes (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000) in the timescale of 5 to 30 min. When light intensity increases, the PSII core protein phosphorylation increases, whereas the level of LHCII phosphorylation decreases. On the contrary, a decrease in light intensity decreases the phosphorylation level of PSII core proteins but strongly increases the phosphorylation of the LHCII proteins (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000). The presence and absence of the PSI-LHCII state transition complex correlate with LHCII phosphorylation (similar to the state transitions; Pesaresi et al., 2009; Wientjes et al., 2013b). Despite all of these changes in thylakoid protein phosphorylation, the relative excitation of PSII and PSI (i.e. the absorption cross section of PSII and PSI measured by 77-K fluorescence) remains nearly unchanged upon changes in white-light intensity (i.e. no state transitions can be observed despite massive differences in LHCII protein phosphorylation; Tikkanen et al., 2010).The existence of the opposing behaviors of PSII core and LHCII protein phosphorylation, as described above, has been known for more than 15 years (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000), but the physiological significance of this phenomenon has remained elusive. It is known that PSII core protein phosphorylation in high light (HL) facilitates the unpacking of PSII-LHCII complexes required for proper processing of the damaged PSII centers and thus, prevents oxidative damage of the photosynthetic machinery (Tikkanen et al., 2008a; Fristedt et al., 2009; Goral et al., 2010; Kirchhoff et al., 2011). It is also known that the damaged PSII core protein D1 needs to be dephosphorylated before its proteolytic degradation upon PSII turnover (Koivuniemi et al., 1995). There is, however, no coherent understanding available to explain why LHCII proteins are dephosphorylated upon exposure of plants to HL and PSII core proteins are dephosphorylated upon exposure to low light (LL).The above-described light quantity-dependent control of thylakoid protein phosphorylation drastically differs from the light quality-dependent protein phosphorylation (Tikkanen et al., 2010). State transitions are generally investigated by using different light qualities, preferentially exciting either PSI or PSII. State 1 light favors PSI excitation, leading to oxidation of the ETC and dephosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII proteins. State 2 light, in turn, preferentially excites PSII, leading to reduction of ETC and strong concomitant phosphorylation of both the PSII core and LHCII proteins (Haldrup et al., 2001). Shifts between states 1 and 2 lights induce state transitions, mechanisms that change the excitation between PSII and PSI (Murata and Sugahara, 1969; Murata, 2009). Similar to shifts between state lights, the shifts between LL and HL intensity also change the phosphorylation of the PSII core and LHCII proteins (Rintamäki et al., 1997, 2000). Importantly, the white-light intensity-induced changes in thylakoid protein phosphorylation do not change the excitation energy distribution between the two photosystems (Tikkanen et al., 2010). Despite this fundamental difference between the light quantity- and light quality-induced thylakoid protein phosphorylations, a common feature for both mechanisms is a strict requirement of LHCII phosphorylation for formation of the PSI-LHCII complex. However, it is worth noting that LHCII phosphorylation under state 2 light is not enough to induce the state 2 transition but that the P-LHCII docking proteins in the PSI complex are required (Lunde et al., 2000; Jensen et al., 2004; Zhang and Scheller, 2004; Leoni et al., 2013).Thylakoid protein phosphorylation is a dynamic redox-regulated process dependent on the interplay between two kinases (STN7 and STN8; Depège et al., 2003; Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Vainonen et al., 2005) and two phosphatases (TAP38/PPH1 and PBCP; Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010; Samol et al., 2012). Concerning the redox regulation mechanisms in vivo, only the LHCII kinase (STN7) has so far been thoroughly studied (Vener et al., 1997; Rintamäki et al., 2000; Lemeille et al., 2009). The STN7 kinase is considered as the LHCII kinase, and indeed, it phosphorylates the LHCB1 and LHCB2 proteins (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Tikkanen et al., 2006). In addition to this, STN7 takes part in the phosphorylation of PSII core proteins (Vainonen et al., 2005), especially in LL (Tikkanen et al., 2008b, 2010). The STN8 kinase is required for phosphorylation of PSII core proteins in HL but does not significantly participate in phosphorylation of LHCII (Bellafiore et al., 2005; Bonardi et al., 2005; Vainonen et al., 2005; Tikkanen et al., 2010). It has been shown that, in traditional state 1 condition, which oxidizes the ETC, the dephosphorylation of LHCII is dependent on TAP38/PPH1 phosphatase (Pribil et al., 2010; Shapiguzov et al., 2010), whereas the PSII core protein dephosphorylation is dependent on the PBCP phosphatase (Samol et al., 2012). However, it remains unresolved whether and how the TAP38/PPH1 and PBCP phosphatases are involved in the light intensity-dependent regulation of thylakoid protein phosphorylation typical for natural environments.Here, we have used the two kinase (stn7 and stn8) and the two phosphatase (tap38/pph1and pbcp) mutants of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) to elucidate the individual roles of these enzymes in reversible thylakoid protein phosphorylation and distribution of excitation energy between PSII and PSI upon changes in light intensity. It is shown that the TAP38/PPH1-dependent, redox-regulated LHCII dephosphorylation is the key component to maintain excitation balance between PSII and PSI upon increase in light intensity, which at the same time, induces strong phosphorylation of the PSII core proteins. Collectively, reversible but opposite phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the PSII core and LHCII proteins upon increase or decrease in light intensity are shown to be crucial for maintenance of even distribution of excitation energy to both photosystems, thus preventing state transitions. Moreover, evidence is provided indicating that the pH gradient across the thylakoid membrane is yet another important component in regulation of the distribution of excitation energy to PSII and PSI, possibly by affecting the regulation of thylakoid kinases and phosphatases.     

Recovery from Photoinhibition in Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Acclimated to Varying Growth Irradiances (Role of D1 Protein Turnover)

D1 protein turnover and restoration of the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (PSII) after photoinhibition of pea leaves (Pisum sativum L. cv Greenfeast) acclimated to different light intensities were investigated. All peas acclimated to different light intensities were able to recover from photoinhibition, at least partially, at light intensities far above their growth light irradiance. However, the capacity of pea leaves to recover from photoinhibition under increasing high irradiances was strictly dependent on the light acclimation of the leaves; i.e. the higher the irradiance during growth, the better the capacity of pea leaves to recover from photoinhibition at moderate and high light. In our experimental conditions, mainly D1 protein turnover-dependent recovery was monitored, since in the presence of an inhibitor of chloroplast-encoded protein synthesis, lincomycin, only negligible recovery took place. In darkness, neither the restoration of PSII photochemical efficiency nor any notable degradation of damaged D1 protein took place. In low light, however, good recovery of PSII occurred in all peas acclimated to different light intensities and was accompanied by fast degradation of the D1 protein. The rate of degradation of the D1 protein was estimated to be 3 to 4 times faster in photoinhibited leaves than in nonphotoinhibited leaves under the recovery conditions of 50 [mu]mol of photons m-2 s-1. In moderate light of 400 [mu]mol of photons m-2 s-1, the photoinhibited low-light peas were not able to increase further the rate of D1 protein degradation above that observed in nonphotoinhibited leaves, nor was the restoration of PSII function possible. On the other hand, photoinhibited high-light leaves were able to increase the rate of D1 protein degradation above that of nonphotoinhibited leaves even in moderate and high light, ensuring at least partial restoration of PSII function. We conclude that the capacity of photoinhibited leaves to restore PSII function at different irradiances was directly related to the capacity of the leaves to degrade damaged D1 protein under the recovery conditions.