An overview of some mechanisms of bacterial pathogenesis

The adherence of microorganisms to host surfaces is highly specific, and in many cases, essential for subsequent pathogenetic events to occur. A dynamic process leading to increased mucosal adherence of gram-negative bacilli to epithelial cell receptors in the oral cavity appears to be the initial step in the development of pneumonia. In infectious processes secondary to Streptococcus pneumoniae, adherence may also play a role in specific syndromes. In many cases, however, colonization of oropharyngeal mucus itself, the presence of capsular polysaccharide, and the release of various cell wall components appear to interact to cause clinical disease. In Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections, adherence is all important and is mediated by a number of cell surface structures. These have been studied extensively. Many of these structures, such as pili and protein II, exhibit great variability both between strains and in the same organism at different stages of infection. Others, such as protein I, are more constant. This information has been used in the production of specific vaccines to more preserved structures to inhibit adherence. These will be tested in the near future. It is our view that a better understanding of the many forms of bacterial adherence will be the key to our designing more effective strategies to detect early infection and to intervene more decisively to limit its spread.     

Location of the isoleucine arrest point in CHO and 3T3 cells

An isoleucine arrest point in G1 was determined by two methods for CHO and 3T3 cells. In the first method the fraction of cells entering S after isoleucine deprivation was assessed by [³H]thymidine labelling and autoradiography. In the second method cells entering S after isoleucine deprivation were identified by double-label autoradiography using [³H] and [¹⁴C]thymidine. From the fraction of cells entering S, determined by the two methods, the arrest point in G1 (and entry into G0) is located within the last 40 min of G1.     

Molecular control of rabbit follicular testosterone production. Role of protein and RNA after stimulation with luteinizing hormone.

The time and dose dependence of the relationship between uptake of labelled precursors into protein and RNA and production of testosterone by rabbit follicles was examined. Although testosterone production was stimulated by luteinizing hormone at concentrations between 0.1 and 10 microgram/ml, the uptake of [3H]leucine into protein was significant only when the concentration of luteinizing hormone was greater than 2.5 microgram/ml. Increased production of testosterone was observed within 15 min of stimulation with luteinizing hormone whereas uptake of [3H]leucine was only significant at 90 min. Puromycin (40 microgram/ml) and cycloheximide (10 microgram/ml) in the presence of luteinizing hormone inhibited the synthesis of both testosterone and protein. However, lower concentrations of puromycin (0.1, 1 and 10 microgram/ml) and cycloheximide (1 microgram/ml) had no effect on luteinizing hormone-induced testosterone production but significantly inhibited protein synthesis by 58, 37, 31 and 71%, respectively. Actinomycin D (20, 80 and 160 microgram/ml) alone and in combination with 5 microgram luteinizing hormone/ml severely inhibited uptake of [3H]uridine into RNA without affecting testosterone production. However, with 1 microgram actinomycin/ml, testosterone production was significantly (P less than 0.01) greater than in the presence of luteinizing hormone alone. These results cast doubt on the obligatory role of RNA and protein synthesis in rabbit ovarian follicular steroidogenesis.