Surface Structure of Bacillus stearothermophilus Ribosomes

No significant differences were noted in either the size or in the arrangement of the surface filaments of the ribosomes of Bacillus stearothermophilus and Escherichia coli.     

Electrophoretic and Immunological Differences Between the Cytochrome c3 of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans and that of Desulfovibrio vulgaris

The cytochrome c(3) of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans and that of D. vulgaris were purified to homogeneity as judged by disc gel electrophoresis and by ultracentrifugation. Both cytochromes had an oxidation-reduction potential of -205 +/- 5 mv at pH 7.0 and showed characteristic absorption bands at 525 and 553 nm in the reduced state. The molecular weights of the two cytochromes (calculated from sedimentation and diffusion data) were similar, with values of 13,500 to 14,300 for D. desulfuricans and 13,800 to 14,700 for D. vulgaris. The two cytochromes differed in their electrophoretic properties on Geon and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and did not share a common precipitating antigenic determinant as judged by immunodiffusion data.     

Investigation of Reported Aflatoxin Production by Fungi Outside the Aspergillus flavus Group

A screening study of 121 fungus isolates, representing 29 species, for aflatoxin synthesis demonstrated this property only in Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus. Eight of the organisms found negative were isolates reported by other investigators to produce aflatoxin. Since similar negative reports have come from several other workers, it is concluded that only the A. flavus group of Aspergillus can presently be certified as sources of these toxins. Reasons for possible false-positive findings are discussed along with precautionary measures and differential analytical procedures useful in aflatoxin screening studies.     

Protein synthesis by microsomal particles from regenerating rat liver

1. Washed microsome particles from regenerating liver were shown to incorporate [(14)C]leucine into protein more actively than similar preparations from normal liver. 2. The total incorporation in the preparations from regenerating liver increased linearly with the amount of protein incubated, whereas this was not so with preparations from normal liver. 3. The greater activity of regenerating-liver microsomes appeared to be associated with the bound polysomes. 4. The size distribution of polysomes obtained after removal of membrane with deoxycholate was the same in normal and regenerating liver. 5. In general the activity of polysome preparations from normal and regenerating liver was similar. 6. It is concluded that the greater activity of the particles in the microsome fraction from regenerating liver is to be attributed to the ribosomes bound to membrane and that their activity is controlled by factors present in the membrane.