Changes in species' distributions during and after environmental change: which eco‐evolutionary processes matter more?

Improving our capacity for predicting range shifts requires improved theory exploring the interplay between ecological and evolutionary processes and the (changing) environment. We introduce an individual‐based model incorporating simple stage structure and genetically determined resource allocation rules. Population dynamics are mediated by the resources available and the individual's genetics, and density dependence emerges solely as a consequence of resource levels decreasing as population density increases. Running the model for a set of stylised range‐expansion scenarios reveals the extent to which eco‐evolutionary processes can matter: spatial assortment of individuals possessing effective range expansion strategies (higher dispersal propensity, semelparity rather than iteroparity) can substantially accelerate range advance, and this is more important than the contribution of novel mutations arising during range expansion. In simulations of range expansion there is a greater risk of extinction when all individuals are given the mean strategy evolved in a stationary range. Additionally, our results demonstrate that the erosion of inter‐individual variability during a range‐shift can depress population abundance for lengthy periods, even after the climate has stabilised. Our theoretical results highlight the importance of accounting for inter‐individual variability in future predictive modelling of species' responses to environmental change.     

Metastatic tumor evolution and organoid modeling implicate TGFBR2 as a cancer driver in diffuse gastric cancer

Background

Gastric cancer is the second-leading cause of global cancer deaths, with metastatic disease representing the primary cause of mortality. To identify candidate drivers involved in oncogenesis and tumor evolution, we conduct an extensive genome sequencing analysis of metastatic progression in a diffuse gastric cancer. This involves a comparison between a primary tumor from a hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome proband and its recurrence as an ovarian metastasis.

Results

Both the primary tumor and ovarian metastasis have common biallelic loss-of-function of both the CDH1 and TP53 tumor suppressors, indicating a common genetic origin. While the primary tumor exhibits amplification of the Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) gene, the metastasis notably lacks FGFR2 amplification but rather possesses unique biallelic alterations of Transforming growth factor-beta receptor 2 (TGFBR2), indicating the divergent in vivo evolution of a TGFBR2-mutant metastatic clonal population in this patient. As TGFBR2 mutations have not previously been functionally validated in gastric cancer, we modeled the metastatic potential of TGFBR2 loss in a murine three-dimensional primary gastric organoid culture. The Tgfbr2 shRNA knockdown within Cdh1^-/-; Tp53^-/- organoids generates invasion in vitro and robust metastatic tumorigenicity in vivo, confirming Tgfbr2 metastasis suppressor activity.

Conclusions

We document the metastatic differentiation and genetic heterogeneity of diffuse gastric cancer and reveal the potential metastatic role of TGFBR2 loss-of-function. In support of this study, we apply a murine primary organoid culture method capable of recapitulating in vivo metastatic gastric cancer. Overall, we describe an integrated approach to identify and functionally validate putative cancer drivers involved in metastasis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0428-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Src Phosphorylation of ��-Receptor Is Responsible for the Receptor Switching from an Inhibitory to a Stimulatory Signal

Recent studies have revealed that in G protein-coupled receptor signalings switching between G protein- and β-arrestin (βArr)-dependent pathways occurs. In the case of opioid receptors, the signal is switched from the initial inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC) to an increase in AC activity (AC activation) during prolonged agonist treatment. The mechanism of such AC activation has been suggested to involve the switching of G proteins activated by the receptor, phosphorylation of signaling molecules, or receptor-dependent recruitment of cellular proteins. Using protein kinase inhibitors, dominant negative mutant studies and mouse embryonic fibroblast cells isolated from Src kinase knock-out mice, we demonstrated that μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1)-mediated AC activation requires direct association and activation of Src kinase by lipid raft-located OPRM1. Such Src activation was independent of βArr as indicated by the ability of OPRM1 to activate Src and AC after prolonged agonist treatment in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells lacking both βArr-1 and -2. Instead the switching of OPRM1 signals was dependent on the heterotrimeric G protein, specifically G_i2 α-subunit. Among the Src kinase substrates, OPRM1 was phosphorylated at Tyr³³⁶ within NPXXY motif by Src during AC activation. Mutation of this Tyr residue, together with mutation of Tyr¹⁶⁶ within the DRY motif to Phe, resulted in the complete blunting of AC activation. Thus, the recruitment and activation of Src kinase by OPRM1 during chronic agonist treatment, which eventually results in the receptor tyrosine phosphorylation, is the key for switching the opioid receptor signals from its initial AC inhibition to subsequent AC activation.Classical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)² signaling involves the activation of specific heterotrimeric G proteins and the subsequent dissociation of α- and βγ-subunits. These G protein subunits serve as the activators and/or inhibitors of several effector systems, including adenylyl cyclases, phospholipases, and ion channels (1). However, recent studies have shown that GPCR signaling deviates from such a classical linear model. For example, in kidney and colonic epithelial cells, protease-activated receptor 1 can transduce its signals through either Gα_i/o or Gα_q subunits via inhibition of small GTPase RhoA or activation of RhoD. Thus, RhoA and RhoD act as molecular switches between the negative and positive signaling activity of protease-activated receptor 1 (2). Another example is the ability of β₂-adrenergic receptor to switch from G_s-dependent pathways to non-classical signaling pathways by coupling to pertussis toxin-sensitive G_i proteins in a cAMP-dependent protein kinase/protein kinase C phosphorylation-dependent manner. In this case, the phosphorylation-induced switch in G protein coupling provides the receptor access to alternative signaling pathways. For β₂-adrenergic receptors, this leads to a G_i-dependent activation of MAP kinase (3, 4). Furthermore the involvement of protein scaffolds, such as β-arrestins in the MAP kinase cascade, could also alter the GPCR signaling (5–8). Hence the formation of “signaling units” or “receptosomes” would influence the GPCR signaling process and destination.For opioid receptors, which are members of the rhodopsin GPCR subfamily receptors, signal switching is also observed. Normally opioid receptors inhibit AC activity, activate the MAP kinases and Kir3 K⁺ channels, inhibit the voltage-dependent Ca²⁺ channels, and regulate other effectors such as phospholipase C (9). However, during prolonged agonist treatment, not only is there a blunting of these cellular responses but also a compensatory increase in intracellular cAMP level, which is particularly significant upon the removal of the agonist or the addition of an antagonist such as naloxone (10–12). This compensatory adenylyl cyclase activation phenomenon has been postulated to be responsible for the development of drug tolerance and dependence (13). The observed change from receptor-mediated AC inhibition to receptor-mediated AC activation reflects possible receptor signal switching. Although the exact mechanism for such signal changes has yet to be elucidated, activation of specific protein kinases and subsequent phosphorylation of AC isoforms (14, 15) and other signaling molecules (16) have been suggested to be the key for observed AC activation. Among all the protein kinases studied, involvement of protein kinase C, MAP kinase, and Raf-1 has been implicated in the activation of AC (17–19). Alternative mechanisms, such as agonist-induced receptor internalization and the increase in the constitutive activities of the receptor, also have been suggested to play a role in increased AC activity after prolonged opioid agonist treatment (20). Earlier studies also implicated the switching of the opioid receptor from G_i/G_o to G_s coupling during chronic agonist treatment (21). Regardless of the mechanism, the exact molecular events that lead to the switching of opioid receptor from an inhibitory response to a stimulatory response remain elusive.Src kinases, which are members of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase family, have been implicated in GPCR function because several Src family members such as cSrc, Fyn, and Yes have been reported to be activated by several GPCRs, including β₂- (22) and β₃ (23)-adrenergic, M₂- (24) and M₃ (25)-muscarinic, and bradykinin receptors (26). The GPCRs that are capable of activating Src predominantly couple to G_i/o family G proteins (27). Src kinases appear to associate with, and be activated by, GPCRs themselves either through direct interaction with intracellular receptor domains or by binding to GPCR-associated proteins, such as G protein subunits or β-arrestins (27). Src kinase has been reported to be activated by κ- (28) and δ (29)-opioid receptors and regulate the c-Jun kinase and MAP kinase activities. Src kinase within the nucleus accumbens has been implicated in the rewarding effect and hyperlocomotion induced by morphine in mice (30). However, it is not clear whether the Src kinase is activated and involved in the signal transduction in AC activation after chronic opioid agonist administration.Previously we reported that the lipid raft location of the receptor and the Gα_i2 proteins are two prerequisites for the observed increase in AC activity during prolonged agonist treatment (31, 32). Because various protein kinases including Src kinases and G proteins have been shown to be enriched in lipid rafts (33), the roles of these cellular proteins in the eventual switching of opioid receptor signals from inhibition to stimulation of AC activity were examined in the current studies. We were able to demonstrate that the association with and subsequent activation of Src kinase by the μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1), which leads to eventual tyrosine phosphorylation of OPRM1, are the cellular events required for the switching of opioid receptor signaling upon chronic agonist treatment.     

Toward a molecular equivalent dose: use of the medaka model in comparative risk assessment

Recent changes in the risk assessment landscape underscore the need to be able to compare the results of toxicity and dose-response testing between a growing list of animal models and, quite possibly, an array of in vitro screening assays. How do we compare test results for a given compound between vastly different species? For example, what dose level in the ambient water of a small fish model would be equivalent to 10 ppm of a given compound in the rat's drinking water? Where do we begin? To initially address these questions, and in order to compare dose-response tests in a standard rodent model with a fish model, we used the concept of molecular dose. Assays that quantify types of DNA damage that are directly relevant to carcinogenesis integrate the factors such as chemical exposure, uptake, distribution, metabolism, etc. that tend to vary so widely between different phyletic levels. We performed parallel exposures in F344 rats and Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) to the alkylating hepatocarcinogen, dimethylnitrosamine (DMN). In both models, we measured the DNA adducts 8-hydroxyguanine, N(7)-methylguanine and O(6)-methylguanine in the liver; mutation frequency using lambda cII transgenic medaka and lambda cII transgenic (Big Blue(R)) rats; and early morphological changes in the livers of both models using histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Pulse dose levels in fish were 0, 10, 25, 50, or 100 ppm DMN in the ambient water for 14 days. Since rats are reported to be especially sensitive to DMN, they received 0, 0.1, 1, 5, 10, or 25 ppm DMN in the drinking water for the same time period. While liver DNA adduct concentrations were similar in magnitude, mutant frequencies in the DMN-exposed medaka were up to 20 times higher than in the Big Blue rats. Future work with other compounds will generate a more complete picture of comparative dose response between different phyletic levels and will help guide risk assessors using "alternative" models.