Influence of brown stink bug feeding,planting date and sampling time on common smut infection of maize

Phytopathogen infections are frequently influenced by both biotic and abiotic factors in a crop field. The effect of brown stink bug, Euschistus servus (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), feeding and planting date and sampling time on common smut (Ustilago maydis) infection percentage of maize plants was examined in 2005 and 2006, and 2010 and 2011, respectively. Brown stink bug adult feeding on maize hybrid “DKC6971” at flowering in 2005 and 2006 did not influence smut infection percentage when examined using 3 treatments (i.e., 0 adult, 5 adults, and 5 adults mixed with the smut spores). The smut infection percentages were <3% (n = 12) in the 3 treatments. The smut infection percentage among the 4 weekly samplings was the same, so was natural aflatoxin contamination at harvest among the treatments. The 2nd experiment showed that planting date did not affect the smut infection percentage in either 2010 or 2011. But, the smut infection percentage from the postflowering sampling was greater than preflowering sampling in both years. The smut infection percentage varied among the germplasm lines in 2010, but not in 2011. This study demonstrated that brown stink bug feeding at flowering had no effect on smut infection in maize, and the best time for smut evaluation would be after flowering. The temperature and precipitation might have also influenced the percentage of smut‐infected maize plants during the 4 years when the experiments were conducted. The similarity between kernel‐colonizing U. maydis and Aspergillus flavus infections and genotype × environment interaction were also discussed.     

Facilitatory effects of pituitary transplants on intraspecific aggression in female hamsters

To help clarify the relationship between prolactin (PRL) secretion and aggression in the hamster, the aggressiveness of ovariectomized females given two ectopically grafted pituitary glands was compared to that of ovariectomized control females which underwent a sham transplantation procedure. In a series of three neutral territory tests with male partners, female-initiated attacks, chasing, and fighting were more frequent in the pituitary-grafted group than in the controls. Male partners of pituitary-grafted females responded by exhibiting more submissive behavior than did males paired with control females. In a final test in which pituitary-grafted females were paired with control female partners, control females were found to be more submissive and less aggressive than experimentals despite a significant body weight advantage. These results demonstrate a facilitatory effect of pituitary transplantation on aggression which is independent of gonadal hormones. Because an association between heightened aggressiveness and reported elevations in PRL secretion is observed in pituitary-grafted females and in pregnant and lactating females, these findings lend further support to the hypothesis that PRL promotes aggression during the hamster reproductive cycle.