首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   84篇
  免费   42篇
  2022年   1篇
  2021年   2篇
  2020年   2篇
  2019年   1篇
  2018年   1篇
  2017年   2篇
  2015年   2篇
  2014年   6篇
  2013年   5篇
  2012年   4篇
  2011年   3篇
  2010年   5篇
  2009年   4篇
  2008年   2篇
  2007年   3篇
  2006年   3篇
  2005年   4篇
  2004年   8篇
  2003年   13篇
  2002年   12篇
  2001年   16篇
  2000年   4篇
  1999年   1篇
  1998年   2篇
  1997年   1篇
  1995年   1篇
  1991年   1篇
  1986年   2篇
  1982年   2篇
  1981年   1篇
  1980年   1篇
  1979年   3篇
  1978年   1篇
  1976年   2篇
  1975年   1篇
  1974年   1篇
  1968年   1篇
  1961年   2篇
排序方式: 共有126条查询结果,搜索用时 171 毫秒
41.
42.
43.
An extracellular enzyme capable of efficient hydrolysis of xanthophyll esters was purified from culture supernatants of the basidiomycete Pleurotus sapidus. Under native conditions, the enzyme exhibited a molecular mass of 430 kDa, and SDS-PAGE data suggested a composition of eight identical subunits. Biochemical characterisation of the purified protein showed an isoelectric point of 4.5, and ideal hydrolysis conditions were observed at pH 5.8 and 40 degrees C. Partial amino acid sequences were derived from N-terminal Edman degradation and from mass spectrometric ab initio sequencing of internal peptides. An 1861-bp cDNA containing an open reading frame of 1641 bp was cloned from a cDNA library that showed ca. 40% homology to Candida rugosa lipases. The P. sapidus carboxylesterase represents the first enzyme of the lipase/esterase family from a basidiomycetous fungus that has been characterised at the molecular level.  相似文献   
44.
45.
46.
In vertebrates, symmetric versus asymmetric cleavage of beta-carotene in the biosynthesis of vitamin A and its derivatives has been controversially discussed. Recently we have been able to identify a cDNA encoding a metazoan beta,beta-carotene-15,15'-dioxygenase from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. This enzyme catalyzes the key step in vitamin A biosynthesis, symmetrically cleaving beta-carotene to give two molecules of retinal. Mutations in the corresponding gene are known to lead to a blind, vitamin A-deficient phenotype. Orthologs of this enzyme have very recently been found also in vertebrates and molecularly characterized. Here we report the identification of a cDNA from mouse encoding a second type of carotene dioxygenase catalyzing exclusively the asymmetric oxidative cleavage of beta-carotene at the 9',10' double bond of beta-carotene and resulting in the formation of beta-apo-10'-carotenal and beta-ionone, a substance known as a floral scent from roses, for example. Besides beta-carotene, lycopene is also oxidatively cleaved by the enzyme. The deduced amino acid sequence shares significant sequence identity with the beta,beta-carotene-15,15'-dioxygenases, and the two enzyme types have several conserved motifs. To establish its occurrence in different vertebrates, we then attempted and succeeded in cloning cDNAs encoding this new type of carotene dioxygenase from human and zebrafish as well. As regards their possible role, the apocarotenals formed by this enzyme may be the precursors for the biosynthesis of retinoic acid or exert unknown physiological effects. Thus, in contrast to Drosophila, in vertebrates both symmetric and asymmetric cleavage pathways exist for carotenes, revealing a greater complexity of carotene metabolism.  相似文献   
47.
48.
49.
Breithaupt H 《EMBO reports》2011,12(7):641-643
Research infrastructures are a crucial component of modern biological research, but the EU has not yet figured out how to fund and maintain them.The development of recombinant gene technology in the 1970s heralded a new era of application-oriented research for molecular biology, with a huge economic impact. During the decades that have followed, biological research and development have become a major enterprise, with an increasing demand for sophisticated technologies, databases, tissue banks and other tools that range from microscopes and DNA sequencers to bioinformatics services and mutant collections. Biology has followed in the footsteps of physics and astronomy, which share costly instrumentation such as particle accelerators, observatories and satellites. A key difference is that biological research infrastructures are often distributed across several sites and are less costly to establish. Nevertheless, they are expensive to operate and maintain, and need long-term financial support.There is no doubt among scientists that research infrastructures are essential for biomedicine and the life sciencesThe European Union (EU) regards biomedical research as an important component of its future economic and social development as part of its ''Innovation Union'' strategy (EC, 2010), but the necessary creation and operation of research infrastructures is not keeping pace. European biologists have been highlighting the problem for years (van Dyck, 2005), to the effect that some pan-European infrastructures for biomedical research and the life sciences have been created, such as the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI; Hinxton, UK). The European Commission (EC) also established the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) in 2002, to define the infrastructures required for international research (ESFRI, 2006, 2011). However, most of the planned projects for the biomedical and life sciences (ESFRI, 2011)
ProjectConstruction costs (million €)Operation costs (million €)
Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI)1703
European Advanced Translational Research Infrastructure in Medicine (EATRIS)20–1003–8
European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN)03.5
European Life Science Infrastructure for Biological Information (ELIXIR)470100
European Marine Biology Resource Centre (EMBRC)10060
European Infrastructure of Open Screening Platforms for Chemical Biology (EU-OPENSCREEN)4040
European Biomedical Imaging Infrastructure (Euro-Bioimaging)600160
European Research Infrastructure on Highly Pathogenic Agents (ERINHA)17424
European Infrastructure for Phenotyping and Archiving of Model Mammalian Genomes (Infrafrontier)18080
An Integrated Structural Biology Infrastructure for Europe (INSTRUCT)30025
Infrastructure for Analysis and Experimentation on Ecosystems (ANAEE)21012
Infrastructure for Systems Biology-Europe (ISBE)300100
Microbial Resource Research Infrastructure (MIRRI)19010.5
Open in a separate windowAs part of the ongoing discussion about the EC''s next framework programme for research, a hearing took place on 5 May at the European Parliament (EP) in Brussels, Belgium, to discuss the long-term future of biomedical research infrastructures in Europe. A few members of the EP and their staff, and scientists and representatives from the EC, debated models of how to develop and support global research infrastructure projects. Predictably, the most important questions were about who would pay the bills. “We need conditions to provide stable funding and support, particularly in economically difficult times,” said Antonio Correia de Campos, MEP and vice chairman of the EP''s Science and Technology Options Assessment....well-funded research infrastructures with sophisticated equipment and experienced staff generate a huge return on investmentThere is no doubt among scientists that research infrastructures are essential for biomedicine and the life sciences. Janet Thornton, Director of the EBI, explained that centrally managed infrastructures have a crucial role at all levels, from basic to translational research to product development. Ivan Baines, Chief Operating Officer at the Max Planck Institutes in Dresden, Germany, and Miami, USA, stressed that infrastructures make research more efficient by giving scientists access to sophisticated services, tools and technology that no research institute or university would be able to afford alone. Globally shared research infrastructures are therefore more cost-efficient because they reduce redundancy and enable more-efficient use of data and tools—a clear ''economy of scale'' effect. In general, as Baines commented, well-funded research infrastructures with sophisticated equipment and experienced staff generate a huge return on investment.Not surprisingly, research infrastructures are set to play a central role in the EU''s Innovation Union. The overall rationale is to create a European research landscape clustered around shared research infrastructures in order to meet major challenges, such as tackling global climate change, the health issues of an ageing population, clean and sustainable energy and water production, sustainable food supplies and the risk of disease pandemics. Moreover, the infrastructures themselves would be linked to each other to share data and expertise so as to form a network of pan-European institutions and facilities that support scientists at every step of their research. The proposed Euro-Bioimaging project, for example, would include research institutes, universities and commercial partners that provide state-of-the-art imaging technology to the scientific community and promote standardization, best practice and coordination of research, in addition to researching and developing new imaging technologies.In their 2006 roadmap, the ESFRI recommended creating six biomedical research infrastructures—a number expanded to 10 in their 2008 roadmap (ESFRI, 2006). In addition, the roadmap proposes the creation of e-infrastructures to connect and support increasingly diverse and distributed sites. Just two days before the hearing, the ESFRI published its 2010 roadmap, which lists three more projects and strongly reiterates the important role for pan-European research infrastructures (ESFRI, 2011).What the 2010 roadmap does not say is who is going to pay. Initial funding from the EC runs out in 2011 and has been earmarked to support the preparatory phase, but not the creation of infrastructure projects, let alone their maintenance and operation. The main problem is that most EU member states alone cannot fund and support even a medium-sized research infrastructure. Unlike the US federal government, which, with the sheer size of its budget, can finance globally shared research institutes or facilities such as the NIH, NASA and the Public Library of Science, even the largest EU member states would be overwhelmed by such costly enterprises.Hervé Pero from the EC''s Directorate Generale for Research and Executive Secretary of the ESFRI identified the major problems for internationally shared research infrastructures: insufficient funding, complex management of diverse and distributed enterprises, insufficient policy tools including validation, legal issues and guaranteeing access for all scientists from the 27 EU member states. Moreover, some national governments are reluctant to finance globally used research institutions that do not directly provide tangible benefits to their economies. “Sometimes it is easy to convince a research minister because he''s a scientist; it''s not so easy to convince financial ministers,” Pero said.The EC therefore proposes to use funding models already used by CERN and the European Molecular Biology Laboratory, in which interested parties—states, philanthrophists, charities or funding organizations—commit to supporting research infrastructure such as databases, bioinformatics services, tissue banks or microscope facilities. “Member states are the key partners for this initiative,” de Campo said. The EC would organize and coordinate support, and create the legal and political framework. The ambitious aim, according to the ESFRI, is that by 2015 the most important research infrastructures should be up and running and freely accessible to the scientific community.It is not clear, however, whether and to what extent EU member states will fund pan-European infrastructures: the UK, Finland and Poland, among others, have earmarked some money for the establishment of ELIXIR—the infrastructure for biological information—and other projects, but this is far from what is needed and does not address the problem of long-term operation and maintenance, particularly in these difficult economic times. Moreover, coordinating support for the 13 projects recommended by the ESFRI remains a major challenge. “It is unprecedented to coordinate all these activities across 27 countries,” Baines remarked.“In times of global challenges, the best answer for the EU is to pull together and not go for nationalistic solutions”Mere coordination by the EC to organize support from individual member states might, therefore, not be enough. Bernd Pulverer, head of publications for EMBO, who moderated the hearing, enquired whether a European agency similar to the European Research Council (ERC), which funds basic research, would be a solution to the problem of guaranteeing long-term stability. Pero agreed that an agency that identifies needs and funds the establishment, maintenance and operation of pan-European infrastructures would be a viable solution, but he was not optimistic. “It would be the way forward to create a body at the EU level to coordinate funds and actions. Unfortunately, the time is not right,” he said. Given the economic crisis, various member states are not keen to contribute more money to the EU. Moreover, the ERC has not existed for long enough to convince the EP and ministers that additional funding for another agency for research would benefit the whole EU. Nevertheless, the EC is aware of the problem of long-term financial support, and has therefore included research infrastructures in its proposal for the next research framework.Some MEPs at the hearing share the concerns of scientists about the viability of long-term funding. Vittorio Prodi expressed concern over nationalistic reflexes that would be an impediment to international research. Instead, he said the EU should focus on the added value of pan-European research infrastructures and their potential for development. Even so, economic and other factors may well force the EU to take a more proactive role. “In times of global challenges, the best answer for the EU is to pull together and not go for nationalistic solutions,” Prodi said, “[and to] give the EU directly the resources that are needed.”  相似文献   
50.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号