Allosteric Regulation of the Human and Mouse Deoxyribonucleotide Triphosphohydrolase Sterile α-Motif/Histidine-Aspartate Domain-containing Protein 1 (SAMHD1)

The deoxyribonucleotide triphosphohydrolase SAMHD1 restricts lentiviral infection by depleting the dNTPs required for viral DNA synthesis. In cultured human fibroblasts SAMHD1 is expressed maximally during quiescence preventing accumulation of dNTPs outside S phase. siRNA silencing of SAMHD1 increases dNTP pools, stops cycling human cells in G₁, and blocks DNA replication. Surprisingly, knock-out of the mouse gene does not affect the well being of the animals. dNTPs are both substrates and allosteric effectors for SAMHD1. In the crystal structure each subunit of the homotetrameric protein contains one substrate-binding site and two nonidentical effector-binding sites, site 1 binding dGTP, site 2 dGTP or dATP. Here we compare allosteric properties of pure recombinant human and mouse SAMHD1. Both enzymes are activated 3–4-fold by allosteric effectors. We propose that in quiescent cells where SAMHD1 is maximally expressed GTP binds to site 1 with very high affinity, stabilizing site 2 of the tetrameric structure. Any canonical dNTP can bind to site 2 and activate SAMHD1, but in cells only dATP or dTTP are present at sufficient concentrations. The apparent K_m for dATP at site 2 is ∼10 μm for mouse and 1 μm for human SAMHD1, for dTTP the corresponding values are 50 and 2 μm. Tetrameric SAMHD1 is activated for the hydrolysis of any dNTP only after binding of a dNTP to site 2. The lower K_m constants for human SAMHD1 induce activation at lower cellular concentrations of dNTPs thereby limiting the size of dNTP pools more efficiently in quiescent human cells.     

Fasting and differential chemotherapy protection in patients

Chronic calorie restriction has been known for decades to prevent or retard cancer growth, but its weight-loss effect and the potential problems associated with combining it with chemotherapy have prevented its clinical application. Based on the discovery in model organisms that short term starvation (STS or fasting) causes a rapid switch of cells to a protected mode, we described a fasting-based intervention that causes remarkable changes in the levels of glucose, IGF-I and many other proteins and molecules and is capable of protecting mammalian cells and mice from various toxins, including chemotherapy. Because oncogenes prevent the cellular switch to this stress resistance mode, starvation for 48 hours or longer protects normal yeast and mammalian cells and mice but not cancer cells from chemotherapy, an effect we termed Differential Stress Resistance (DSR). In a recent article, ten patients who fasted in combination with chemotherapy, reported that fasting was not only feasible and safe but caused a reduction in a wide range of side effects accompanied by an apparently normal and possibly augmented chemotherapy efficacy. Together with the remarkable results observed in animals, these data provide preliminary evidence in support of the human application of this fundamental biogerontology finding, particularly for terminal patients receiving chemotherapy. Here we briefly discuss the basic, pre-clinical and clinical studies on fasting and cancer therapy.Key words: fasting, cancer, chemotherapy, calorie restriction, stress resistanceAfter decades of slow progress in the identification of treatments effective on a wide range of malignancies, cancer treatment is now turning to personalized therapies based in part on pharmacogenomics. By contrast, aging research is moving in the opposite direction by searching for common ways to prevent, postpone and treat a wide range of age-related diseases, based on the modulation of genetic pathways that are conserved from yeast to mammals.¹ In fact, it may be a solid evolutionary and comparative biology-foundation, which makes this ambitious goal of biogerontologists a realistic or at least a promising one. On the other hand, the progress of biogerontology is viewed by many clinicians as too fundamental and far from translational applications. In most cases, it is not clear how aging research will be translated into FDA approved drugs or treatments that have effects that are superior to those already available or being developed. For example, it is not clear how the long-term 20–30% reduction in calorie intake (dietary restriction, DR) that we and many others before us have shown to be effective in extending the life span of model organisms will make humans live longer or healthier.^1–3 Furthermore, despite the fact that long-term DR was confirmed to reduce cancer and cardiovascular disease in monkeys⁴ and to be effective in preventing obesity, type 2 diabetes, inflammation, hypertension and atherosclerosis, as indicated by the early results in humans studies,⁵ it is highly unlikely to be adopted in its more extreme and effective version by even a small portion of the population. For example, the 20 to 40% chronic reduction in daily calorie intake shown to be effective in retarding cancer growth in mice would not be feasible for cancer therapy for multiple reasons: (1) the effects of chronic DR in patients with a clinically evident tumor is expected to delay but not stop the progression of the disease^6–8 and this delay may only occur for a portion of the malignancies,⁹ (2) although weight loss and cachexia in the early stages of treatment are less prevalent than commonly thought,^10–12 the ∼15% loss of BMI and ∼30% long-term loss of body fat caused by a moderate (20%) calorie restriction¹³ may be tolerated by only a very small portion of cancer patients receiving treatment, (3) Because this long-term restriction is accompanied by delayed wound healing and immunologic impairment in rodents,^1,14,15 it is not clear what risks it may impose on cancer patients receiving treatment.¹⁶ Our studies of DSR, which were triggered by our fundamental findings that switching yeast cells to water protected them against a wide range of toxins, started as a way to address these concerns but also as an attempt to achieve a much more potent therapeutic effect than that achieved by DR.^17,18 Because starvation-induced protection can increase many fold when combined with modulation of pro-aging pathways and since it is in principle blocked by the expression of any oncogene, it has the potential to provide a method to allow common chemotherapy to selectively kill cancer cells, independently of the type of cancer.^19–21 The DSR experiments in mammals were also based on our hypothesis that stress resistance and aging regulatory pathways were conserved from yeast to mammals.We found that fasting for 48 or more hours or in vitro starvation conditions that mimic fasting protected mice and/or normal cells but not cancer cells from various chemotherapy drugs and other deleterious agents.²¹ This effect was shown to depend in part on the reduction of circulating IGF-I and glucose levels.^21,22 Although a differential regulation of cell division in normal and cancer cells^23,24 is likely to contribute to DSR, much of it appears to be dependent on protective systems which are normally maintained in an inactive or low activity state even in non-dividing cells.^1,25 In fact, in non-dividing yeast and mice, deficiencies in glucose or IGF-I signaling that match those observed after starvation promote resistance to doxorubicin, a chemotherapy drug that specifically targets muscle cells in the heart.^21,22As expected, many clinicians were skeptical of our hypothesis that cancer treatment could be improved not by a “magic bullet” but by a “not so magic DSR shield” as underlined by Leonard Saltz, an oncologist at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center: “Would I be enthusiastic about enrolling my patients in a trial where they''re asked not to eat for 2.5 days? No.”²⁶ However, ten oncologists did allow their patients, suffering from malignancies ranging from stage II breast cancer to stage IV esophageal, prostate and lung malignancies to undergo a 48–140 hours pre-chemotherapy and a 5–56 hours post chemotherapy water-only fast. The six patients who received chemotherapy with or without fasting reported a reduction in fatigue, weakness and gastrointestinal side effects while fasting²⁷ (Fig. 1). A trend for a reduction of many additional side effects was also reported by the group of patients who always fasted before chemotherapy.²⁷ In those patients whose cancer progression was assessed, chemotherapy was effective and in some cases it was highly effective.²⁷ A clinical trial sponsored by the V-Foundation for Cancer Research, aimed at testing the safety and efficacy of a 24 hour fast in combination with chemotherapy, is in its safety stage. Because it was originally limited to patients diagnosed with bladder cancer the clinical trial progressed slowly. However, its recent expansion to include patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy (breast, ovarian, lung cancer), is expected to expedite it. Conclusive results for the effect of a 3–4 day fast on chemotherapy-dependent side effects and possibly therapeutic index are not expected to become available for several years. Even if a more modest effect than the 1,000-fold differential protection against oxidative stress and chemotherapy observed in normal and cancer-like yeast cells was achieved in humans, this method could result in long-term survival for many patients with metastatic cancers, particularly those in which malignant cells have not acquired multidrug resistance.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Average self-reported severity of symptoms in patients that have received chemotherapy with or without fasting.     

Ubiquitin over-expression promotes E6AP autodegradation and reactivation of the p53/MDM2 pathway in HeLa cells

It has been established that intracellular ubiquitin pools are subject to regulatory constrains. Less certain is the mechanism by which the pool of conjugated ubiquitin shift in parallel with total ubiquitin, and how this type of regulation affects the flux of substrates through the pathway. In this study we demonstrate that ubiquitin over-expression promotes the destabilization of the ubiquitin protein ligase E6AP, by a mechanism involving self-ubiquitination, and the stabilization of p53. These results represent the very first evidence that the levels of a ubiquitin ligase can be regulated in vivo by ubiquitin abundance, supporting the idea that a strict interrelationship between pathway component activities and ubiquitin pool size exists. Interestingly, ubiquitin-induced p53 accumulation did not induce cell-cycle arrest, suggesting that although fluctuations of the intracellular ubiquitin content may actively modulate the level of regulatory proteins, this event is not per se sufficient to elicit a cellular response in terms of proliferation.     

PPAR-gamma ligands modulate effects of LPS in stimulated rat synovial fibroblasts

This work demonstrated the constitutive expressionof peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)- and PPAR-in rat synovial fibroblasts at both mRNA and protein levels. A decrease in PPAR- expression induced by 10 µg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was observed, whereas PPAR- mRNA expression was not modified. 15-Deoxy-^12,14-prostaglandin J₂(15d-PGJ₂) dose-dependently decreased LPS-induced cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 (80%) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA expression (80%), whereas troglitazone (10 µM) only inhibited iNOS mRNA expression (50%). 15d-PGJ₂ decreasedLPS-induced interleukin (IL)-1 (25%) and tumor necrosis factor(TNF)- (40%) expression. Interestingly, troglitazone stronglydecreased TNF- expression (50%) but had no significant effect onIL-1 expression. 15d-PGJ₂ was able to inhibitDNA-binding activity of both nuclear factor (NF)-B and AP-1.Troglitazone had no effect on NF-B activation and was shown toincrease LPS-induced AP-1 activation. 15d-PGJ₂ andtroglitazone modulated the expression of LPS-induced iNOS, COX-2, andproinflammatory cytokines differently. Indeed, troglitazone seems tospecifically target TNF- and iNOS pathways. These results offer newinsights in regard to the anti-inflammatory potential of the PPAR-ligands and underline different mechanisms of action of15d-PGJ₂ and troglitazone in synovial fibroblasts.

     

NMDA and Non-NMDA Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors Modulate Striatal Acetylcholine Release via Pre- and Postsynaptic Mechanisms

Abstract: The effects of NMDA and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) on endogenous acetylcholine release from rat striatal slices and synaptosomes were investigated. Both agonists (1–300 µ M ) facilitated acetylcholine release from slices in a dose-dependent manner. NMDA (100–300 µ M ) and AMPA (30–300 µ M ), however, subsequently inhibited acetylcholine release. NMDA (100 µ M )-induced facilitation was antagonized by 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) and dizocilpine (both 1–10 µ M ), whereas the 10 µ M AMPA effect was antagonized by 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX; 1–30 µ M ). NMDA (100 µ M )-induced inhibition was counteracted by CPP, but not dizocilpine, and by the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor l -nitroarginine (1–100 µ M ). Tetrodotoxin (0.5 µ M ) prevented the facilitatory effect of 3 µ M NMDA and AMPA, but left unchanged that of 30 µ M NMDA and 100 µ M AMPA. Acetylcholine release from synaptosomes was stimulated by KCI (7.5–100 m M ) in a dose-dependent manner. NMDA and AMPA maximally potentiated the 20 m M KCl effect at 1 µ M and 0.01 µ M , but were ineffective at 100 µ M and 10 µ M , respectively. Inhibition of acetylcholine release was never found in synaptosomes. The effects of 1 µ M NMDA and 0.01 µ M AMPA were antagonized by CPP (0.0001–1 µ M ) or dizocilpine (0.0001–10 µ M ) and by CNQX (0.001–1 µ M ), respectively. These data suggest that glutamatergic control of striatal acetylcholine release is mediated via both pre- and post-synaptic NMDA and non-NMDA ionotropic receptors.     

A novel pathway of HMGB1-mediated inflammatory cell recruitment that requires Mac-1-integrin

High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is released extracellularly upon cell necrosis acting as a mediator in tissue injury and inflammation. However, the molecular mechanisms for the proinflammatory effect of HMGB1 are poorly understood. Here, we define a novel function of HMGB1 in promoting Mac-1-dependent neutrophil recruitment. HMGB1 administration induced rapid neutrophil recruitment in vivo. HMGB1-mediated recruitment was prevented in mice deficient in the beta2-integrin Mac-1 but not in those deficient in LFA-1. As observed by bone marrow chimera experiments, Mac-1-dependent neutrophil recruitment induced by HMGB1 required the presence of receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) on neutrophils but not on endothelial cells. In vitro, HMGB1 enhanced the interaction between Mac-1 and RAGE. Consistently, HMGB1 activated Mac-1 as well as Mac-1-mediated adhesive and migratory functions of neutrophils in a RAGE-dependent manner. Moreover, HMGB1-induced activation of nuclear factor-kappaB in neutrophils required both Mac-1 and RAGE. Together, a novel HMGB1-dependent pathway for inflammatory cell recruitment and activation that requires the functional interplay between Mac-1 and RAGE is described here.     

Effect of dehydroleucodine on meiosis reinitiation in Bufo arenarum denuded oocytes

In amphibian oocytes meiosis, the transition from G2 to M phase is regulated by the maturation promoting factor (MPF), a complex of the cyclin-dependent kinase p34/cdc2 and cyclin B. In immature oocytes there is an inactive complex (pre-MPF), in which cdc2 is phosphorylated on both Thr-161 and Thr-14/Tyr-15 residues. The dephosphorylation of Thr-14/Tyr-15 is necessary for the start of MPF activation and it is induced by the activation of cdc25 phosphatase. Late, to complete the activation, a small amount of active MPF induces an auto-amplification loop of MPF stimulation (MPF amplification). Dehydroleucodine (DhL) is a sesquiterpenic lactone that inhibits mammalian cell proliferation in G2. We asked whether DhL interferes with MPF activation. For this question, the effect of DhL (up to 30 microM) on the resumption of meiosis was evaluated, and visualized by germinal vesicle break down (GVBD), of Bufo arenarum oocytes induced in vitro by either: (i) removing follicle cells; (ii) progesterone stimulation; (iii) VG-content injection; or (iv) injection of mature cytoplasm. The results show that DhL induced GVBD inhibition, in a dose-dependent manner, in spontaneous and progesterone-induced oocyte maturation. Nevertheless, DhL at the doses assayed had no effect on GVBD induced by mature cytoplasm injection, but exerted an inhibitory effect on GVBD induced by GV content. On the basis of these results, we interpreted that DhL does not inhibit MPF amplification and that the target of DhL is any event in the early stages of the cdc25 activation cascade.