Single cell heterogeneity

Multi-level heterogeneity is a fundamental but underappreciated feature of cancer. Most technical and analytical methods either completely ignore heterogeneity or do not fully account for it, as heterogeneity has been considered noise that needs to be eliminated. We have used single-cell and population-based assays to describe an instability-mediated mechanism where genome heterogeneity drastically affects cell growth and cannot be accurately measured using conventional averages. First, we show that most unstable cancer cell populations exhibit high levels of karyotype heterogeneity, where it is difficult, if not impossible, to karyotypically clone cells. Second, by comparing stable and unstable cell populations, we show that instability-mediated karyotype heterogeneity leads to growth heterogeneity, where outliers dominantly contribute to population growth and exhibit shorter cell cycles. Predictability of population growth is more difficult for heterogeneous cell populations than for homogenous cell populations. Since “outliers” play an important role in cancer evolution, where genome instability is the key feature, averaging methods used to characterize cell populations are misleading. Variances quantify heterogeneity; means (averages) smooth heterogeneity, invariably hiding it. Cell populations of pathological conditions with high genome instability, like cancer, behave differently than karyotypically homogeneous cell populations. Single-cell analysis is thus needed when cells are not genomically identical. Despite increased attention given to single-cell variation mediated heterogeneity of cancer cells, continued use of average-based methods is not only inaccurate but deceptive, as the “average” cancer cell clearly does not exist. Genome-level heterogeneity also may explain population heterogeneity, drug resistance, and cancer evolution.     

Post‐harvest light treatment increases expression levels of recombinant proteins in transformed plastids of potato tubers

Plastid genetic engineering represents an attractive system for the production of foreign proteins in plants. Although high expression levels can be achieved in leaf chloroplasts, the results for non‐photosynthetic plastids are generally discouraging. Here, we report the expression of two thioredoxin genes (trx f and trx m) from the potato plastid genome to study transgene expression in amyloplasts. As expected, the highest transgene expression was detected in the leaf (up to 4.2% of TSP). The Trx protein content in the tuber was approximately two to three orders of magnitude lower than in the leaf. However, we demonstrate that a simple post‐harvest light treatment of microtubers developed in vitro or soil‐grown tubers induces up to 55 times higher accumulation of the recombinant protein in just seven to ten days. After the applied treatment, the Trx f levels in microtubers and soil‐grown tubers increased to 0.14% and 0.11% of TSP, respectively. Moreover, tubers stored for eight months maintained the capacity of increasing the foreign protein levels after the light treatment. Post‐harvest cold induction (up to five times) at 4°C was also detected in microtubers. We conclude that plastid transformation and post‐harvest light treatment could be an interesting approach for the production of foreign proteins in potato.     

Insights into the regulation of the core clock component TOC1 in the green picoeukaryote Ostreococcus

Living organisms such as plants and animals have evolved endogenous clocks in order to anticipate the environmental changes associated with the earth’s rotation and to orchestrate biological processes in the course of the 24 hour daily cycle. We have recently identified clock components in the primitive green picoalga Ostreococcus tauri, a promising minimal cellular and genomic model for systems biology approaches. A homologue of the Arabidopsis core clock gene Time of CAB expression-1 (TOC1) was shown to play a central role in Ostreococcus heralding an early emergence of clock components in the green lineage. Here we report the regulation of TOC1 at dusk in response to light and dark cues.Key words: Ostreococcus, circadian, clock, plants, microalgaeThe circadian clock is an autonomous timer, which provides for living organisms a means to measure time internally. As such the clock has two fundamental properties: (1) it allows the organism to anticipate daily predictable environmental changes such as light and temperature cycles; (2) it coordinates key physiological processes during the 24 hour daily cycle. As a result, internal time given by the clock and external time given by the photoperiod exhibit a stable phase relationship for a wide range of photoperiods during the course of the year. The clock is therefore also involved in regulating annual rhythms such as flowering (also called photoperiodism) and many clock mutants have been identified on the basis of abnormalities in the timing of flowering. Other clock genes, such as TOC1 were identified through screens for defects in the rhythmic expression of circadian-regulated genes such as the Light-harvesting complex (LHCB/CAB) gene.²In plants, the clock appears as a complex circuit relying on interconnected feedback loops, which are being studied through a combination of experimental and modelling approaches.³ However, circadian studies are complicated by cell-autonomous and tissue specific clockworks in multicellular plants. We have recently implemented tools for gene function, analysis in the very simple green cell Ostreococcus tauri.⁴ Amongst known core clock genes we identified two homologues of the plant clock genes TOC1 and CCA1 (Circadian Clock Associated 1). Furthermore we found that a conserved CCA1 binding site was required for the circadian expression of TOC1. TOC1 appears to play a more central role than CCA1 in the Ostreococcus clock since only TOC1 knock-down abolishes circadian function in constant light.⁴ In plants the dark-dependent degradation of TOC1 relies on the F box protein ZEITLUPE which is stabilized by GIGANTEA in blue light.^5,6 We identified no ZEITLUPE AND GIGANTEA homologues in Ostreococcus. We chose, therefore to investigate the regulation of TOC1 in Ostreococcus at dusk since there are similarities between TOC1 functions and patterns of expression in Ostreococcus and Arabidopsis.     

A Forgotten Chiral Spiro Compound Revisited: 3,3'‐Dimethyl‐3H,3'H‐2,2'‐spirobi[[1,3]benzothiazole]

The title compound was obtained as a side product during dimerization‐oxidation steps of the carbene generated from N‐methylbenzothiazolium iodide. Chromatography on (S,S)‐Whelk O1 column showed on cooling a typical plateau shape chromatogram indicating an exchange between two enantiomers on the column. The thermal barrier to racemization was determined (85 kJ.mol^?1 at 10 °C) by dynamic high‐performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC).The absolute configuration of the first (M) and second eluted (P) enantiomers on the (S, S)‐Whelk O1 column was established by comparing the reconstructed circular dichroism (CD) spectra from the CD detector signal and the calculated CD spectrum of the (P) enantiomer. Mass spectrometry revealed that 3,3'‐dimethyl‐3H,3'H‐2,2'‐spirobi[[1,3]benzothiazole] can be viewed as a masked thiophenate attached to a benzothiazolium framework. Chirality 27:716–721, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

3D culture of cancer cells in alginate hydrogel beads as an effective technique for emergency cell storage and transportation in the pandemic era

Due to the restrictions in accessing research laboratories and the challenges in providing proper storage and transportation of cells during the COVID‐19 pandemic, having an effective and feasible mean to solve these challenges would be of immense help. Therefore, we developed a 3D culture setting of cancer cells using alginate beads and tested its effectiveness in different storage and transportation conditions. The viability and proliferation of cancer cells were assessed using trypan blue staining and quantitative CCK‐8 kit, respectively. The developed beads allowed cancer cells survival up to 4 weeks with less frequent maintenance measures such as change of the culture media or subculture of cells. In addition, the recovery of cancer cells and proliferation pattern were significantly faster with better outcomes in the developed 3D alginate beads compared to the standard cryopreservation of cells or the 2D culture conditions. The 3D alginate beads also supported the viability of cells while the shipment at room temperature for a duration of up to 5 days with no humidity or CO₂ support. Therefore, 3D culture in alginate beads can be used to store or ship biological cells with ease at room temperature with minimal preparations.     

Thioredoxin m4 Controls Photosynthetic Alternative Electron Pathways in Arabidopsis

In addition to the linear electron flow, a cyclic electron flow (CEF) around photosystem I occurs in chloroplasts. In CEF, electrons flow back from the donor site of photosystem I to the plastoquinone pool via two main routes: one that involves the Proton Gradient Regulation5 (PGR5)/PGRL1 complex (PGR) and one that is dependent of the NADH dehydrogenase-like complex. While the importance of CEF in photosynthesis and photoprotection has been clearly established, little is known about its regulation. We worked on the assumption of a redox regulation and surveyed the putative role of chloroplastic thioredoxins (TRX). Using Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants lacking different TRX isoforms, we demonstrated in vivo that TRXm4 specifically plays a role in the down-regulation of the NADH dehydrogenase-like complex-dependent plastoquinone reduction pathway. This result was confirmed in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants overexpressing the TRXm4 orthologous gene. In vitro assays performed with isolated chloroplasts and purified TRXm4 indicated that TRXm4 negatively controls the PGR pathway as well. The physiological significance of this regulation was investigated under steady-state photosynthesis and in the pgr5 mutant background. Lack of TRXm4 reversed the growth phenotype of the pgr5 mutant, but it did not compensate for the impaired photosynthesis and photoinhibition sensitivity. This suggests that the physiological role of TRXm4 occurs in vivo via a mechanism distinct from direct up-regulation of CEF.In plant thylakoids, photosynthesis involves a linear electron flow (LEF) from water to NADP⁺ via PSII, cytochrome b₆/f, PSI, and soluble carriers. LEF produces NADPH and generates a transthylakoidal electrochemical proton gradient that drives the synthesis of ATP. Besides LEF, cyclic electron flow (CEF) can also occur, involving only PSI (for review, see Johnson, 2011; Kramer and Evans, 2011). These additional reactions include two main distinct pathways involving either the Proton Gradient Regulation5 (PGR5)/PGRL1 complex (Munekage et al., 2002; DalCorso et al., 2008) or the NADH dehydrogenase-like complex (NDH; for review, see Battchikova et al., 2011; Ifuku et al., 2011). The functioning of either CEF pathway, which generates a pH gradient ΔpH without any accumulation of NADPH, is thought to achieve the appropriate ATP/NADPH balance required for the biochemical needs of the plant, especially under certain environmental conditions such as low CO₂ (Golding and Johnson, 2003), heat (Clarke and Johnson, 2001), cold (Clarke and Johnson, 2001), drought (Golding and Johnson, 2003; Kohzuma et al., 2009), high light (Munekage et al., 2004), or dark-to-light transitions (Joliot and Joliot, 2005; Fan et al., 2007). CEF-generated ΔpH is also involved in photoprotection owing to the down-regulation of PSII via nonphotochemical quenching (Munekage et al., 2004; Takahashi et al., 2009). Very recently, the role of the PGR5 protein as a regulator of LEF has been established. It has proved to be essential in the protection of PSI from photodamage (Suorsa et al., 2012).The two cyclic pathways are redundant (Munekage et al., 2004), sharing ferredoxin (Fd) as a common stromal electron donor (Yamamoto et al., 2011) and electron carriers from plastoquinone (PQ) to PSI with LEF. Thus, LEF and either of the CEF pathways may be in competition. The molecular events that allow CEF to challenge LEF remain enigmatic, particularly when considering that the conditions that require CEF are also those under which LEF is in excess. Efforts to understand the appropriate functioning of CEF have led to the proposition of several models segregating cyclic and linear pathways at a structural level (for review, see Eberhard et al., 2008; Cardol et al., 2011; Johnson, 2011; Rochaix, 2011). According to the restricted diffusion model, founded on the uneven distribution of the photosynthetic protein complexes in the thylakoids, there is little competition between CEF and LEF, as CEF occurs in stroma lamellae where PSI is concentrated while LEF takes place in the grana stacks. In line with the supercomplex model, whose relevance was demonstrated in the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, CEF happens within tightly bound supercomplexes containing PSI, with its own light-harvesting complex (LHCI), the PSII light-harvesting complex (LHCII), cytochrome b₆/f, Fd, Fd NADP reductase (FNR), and the integral membrane protein PGRL1 (Iwai et al., 2010). In higher plants, an association between NDH and PSI subunits suggests the formation of such supercomplexes (Peng et al., 2009). The availability of FNR, found either free in the stroma or bound to the thylakoids (Zhang et al., 2001), has also been proposed to modulate partitioning between LEF and CEF (Joliot and Joliot, 2006; Joliot and Johnson, 2011). In addition, more dynamic models that illustrate competitive processes involved in the distribution of electrons between the cyclic and linear flows have been proposed. The competition between cytochrome b₆/f and FNR for electrons from Fd could regulate the segregation between LEF and CEF (Breyton et al., 2006; Yamamoto et al., 2006; Hald et al., 2008). A few years ago, Joliot and Joliot (2006) suggested that the ATP/ADP ratio was one of the parameters that triggered on the transition between LEF and CEF. It was also established that the redox poise of chloroplast stroma contributed to the regulation of the photosynthetic pathway and played an important role in defining the extent of CEF. Breyton et al. (2006) scrutinized this redox regulation and established that the fraction of PSI complexes engaged in CEF could be modulated by changes in the stromal redox state. Overreduction of the NADPH pool was involved in the repartition between LEF and CEF (Joliot and Joliot, 2006). The NADPH/NADP⁺ ratio was proposed as a regulator of PGR-dependent CEF in vivo (Okegawa et al., 2008).All the published data supporting a role for the redox status in the regulation of CEF urged us to investigate a putative role of thioredoxins (TRX) in the regulation of CEF. TRX are ubiquitous disulfide reductases regulating the redox status of target proteins (for review, see Lemaire et al., 2007; Meyer et al., 2009). In chloroplast, TRX mediate the light regulation of numerous enzymes, among which some belong to the Calvin cycle (for review, see Schürmann and Buchanan, 2008; Montrichard et al., 2009; Lindahl et al., 2011). Global proteomic approaches have revealed that well-known photosynthetic complex subunits may be partners of TRX, such as PsbO in PSII, plastocyanin, Rieske Fe-S protein in cytochrome b₆/f, and PsaK and PsaN in PSI (for review, see Montrichard et al., 2009; Lindahl et al., 2011). Furthermore, regarding the regulation of photosynthesis, TRX have also been involved in state transitions (Rintamäki et al., 2000; Buchanan and Balmer, 2005), and their participation in the control of the redox poise of the electron transport chain has also been suggested (Johnson, 2003).In this work, we have investigated the possible role of TRX in the regulation of CEF. Using Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants with altered expression of genes encoding different plastid TRX, we have established in vivo the inhibitor activity of TRXm4 on the NDH-dependent pathway for plastoquinone reduction. This result was confirmed in transplastomic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants overexpressing the TRXm4 orthologous gene. Moreover, in vitro assays performed with isolated chloroplasts indicated that TRXm4 negatively controls the PGR-dependent electron flow as well.     

Emerging views of corticothalamic function

Although it is now generally accepted that the thalamus is more than a simple relay of sensory signals to the cortex, we are just beginning to gain an understanding of how corticothalamic feedback influences sensory processing. Results from an increasing number of studies across sensory systems and different species reveal effects of feedback both on the receptive fields of thalamic neurons and on the transmission of sensory information between the thalamus and cortex. Importantly, these studies demonstrate that the cortico-thalamic projection cannot be viewed in isolation, but must be considered as an integral part of a thalamo-corticothalamic circuit which intimately interconnects the thalamus and cortex for sensory processing.