Heart rate and respiratory patterns in mild hypoxia in unanaesthetized newborn mammals

The heart rate and respiratory patterns in hypoxia are not well documented in unanaesthetized intact newborn animals. We studied heart rate and respiratory patterns during quiet sleep in 17% inspired O2 in 31 unanaesthetized newborns of five species: lamb, piglet, puppy, kitten, and rabbit. There was no significant change in mean heart rate and respiratory rate with hypoxia for any species. Brief apneas greater than 5 s were frequent (5-8/h), both in 21 and 17% O2 only in lambs and puppies. No sustained periodic breathing was induced by hypoxia. Thus, mild hypoxia has little steady-state effect on heart rate and respiratory rate and pattern in these unanaesthetized newborns. These findings are compatible with depressed chemoreceptor threshold, but indicate a remarkably mature respiratory pattern in full-term newborns of these species.     

Synaptonemal complexes and meiosis in myxomycetes

Synaptonemal complexes (SC) have been observed in spores 18–24 hr past cleavage in natural fruitings of Physarum cinereum, P. bogoriense, Hemitrichia stipitata, Tubifera ferruginosa, and Arcyria incarnata. Laboratory fruitings of Arcyria cinerea, Stemonitis herbatica, and a homothallic isolate of Physarum pusillum also have SC's present in spores during the same postcleavage period. The presence of these paired chromosomes of meiotic prophase in spores of species collected in nature and in a diversity of taxa suggests that the usual position of meiosis in Myxomycetes is inside the postcleavage spore. Criteria are proposed for evaluating the validity of the SC as an indicator of meiosis.     

Evidence that free GPI glycolipids are essential for growth of Leishmania mexicana.

The cell surface of the parasitic protozoan Leishmania mexicana is coated by glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored glycoproteins, a GPI-anchored lipophosphoglycan and a class of free GPI glycolipids. To investigate whether the anchor or free GPIs are required for parasite growth we cloned the L.mexicana gene for dolichol-phosphate-mannose synthase (DPMS) and attempted to create DPMS knockout mutants by targeted gene deletion. DPMS catalyzes the formation of dolichol-phosphate mannose, the sugar donor for all mannose additions in the biosynthesis of both the anchor and free GPIs, except for a alpha1-3-linked mannose residue that is added exclusively to the free GPIs and lipophosphoglycan anchor precursors. The requirement for dolichol-phosphate-mannose in other glycosylation pathways in L.mexicana is minimal. Deletion of both alleles of the DPMS gene (lmdpms) consistently resulted in amplification of the lmdpms chromosomal locus unless the promastigotes were first transfected with an episomal copy of lmdpms, indicating that lmdpms, and possibly GPI biosynthesis, is essential for parasite growth. As evidence presented in this and previous studies indicates that neither GPI-anchored glycoproteins nor lipophosphoglycan are required for growth of cultured parasites, it is possible that the abundant and functionally uncharacterized free GPIs are essential membrane components.     

Genes,agents and the institution of responsible action

The concern of this paper is with how the accounts of human beings and their behaviour now emerging from genetics, genomics and the new human biotechnology should be related to traditional accounts in which we identify ourselves as responsible agents, capable of choice, who normally act freely and voluntarily. The paper addresses these apparently competing accounts in terms of their functions and modes of use, and thereby arrives at a general solution to this current version of the ancient problem of free will and determinism. The causal scientific discourse of genetics and the everyday discourse of responsibility and choice do different things for us, it suggests, and should not be regarded as articulating conflicting theories. Whilst the former is oriented to the task of naturalistic explanation, the latter is predominantly, if not entirely, a medium of communication through which we affect each other and thereby mutually regulate our conduct. If this is indeed the case, then interesting implications follow concerning the proper relationship of the two kinds of account, which need no longer be regarded as incompatible with each other. And insights emerge into both the limitations and the profound importance of the contribution that genetics and genomics seem destined to make to the understanding of human behaviour.