Re-irradiation after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report

Modern radiotherapy machines with refinements in planning software and image-guidance apparatuses have made stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) more widely available as an effective tool in the management of spine metastases. In conventional palliative radiotherapy, the aim has traditionally been pain relief and short-term local control. In contrast, SBRT aims to deliver an ablative dose to enhance local control, with a smaller number of fractions while sparing the organs at risk (OAR), especially the spinal cord. Recently, trials have asserted the role of spine SBRT as an effective modality for durable local control, in addition to achieving pain relief. The quality of evidence for spine SBRT data is maturing, while prospective published trials on re-irradiation SBRT in spine remain sparse. The purpose of the present case report is to share the challenges faced while salvaging a dorsal spine metastasis and ablating a new right adrenal metastatic lesion in proximity of the transplanted liver.     

Distinct Kinase-Independent Role of RIPK3 in CD11c+ Mononuclear Phagocytes in Cytokine-Induced Tissue Repair

1. Download high-res image (257KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

DDESC: Dragon database for exploration of sodium channels in human

Background

Hepcidin/LEAP-1 is an iron regulatory hormone originally identified as an antimicrobial peptide. As part of a systematic analysis of the evolution of host defense peptides in primates, we have sequenced the orthologous gene from 14 species of non-human primates.

Results

The sequence of the mature peptide is highly conserved amongst all the analyzed species, being identical to the human one in great apes and gibbons, with a single residue conservative variation in Old-World monkeys and with few substitutions in New-World monkeys.

Conclusion

Our analysis indicates that hepcidin's role as a regulatory hormone, which involves interaction with a conserved receptor (ferroportin), may result in conservation over most of its sequence, with the exception of the stretch between residues 15 and 18, which in New-World monkeys (as well as in other mammals) shows a significant variation, possibly indicating that this structural region is involved in other functions.     

Synthesis and conformational evaluation of a novel gene delivery vector for human mesenchymal stem cells

We have synthesized a novel gene delivery vector by covalently combining branched polyethylenimine (bPEI) and hyaluronic acid (HA) with the aim of improving transfection of bPEI into human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) while maintaining cell viability. Because of the opposite charges on bPEI and HA, the bPEI-HA vector forms a zwitterionic polymer capable of inter- and intramolecular interactions. We have characterized the hydrodynamic radius of bPEI-HA and bPEI-HA/DNA complexes at ambient and physiological temperatures, as well as at a range of salt concentrations using light scattering, and investigated the effect of the size of transfecting complexes on gene delivery. We found that by increasing the salt concentration from 150 to 1000 mM of NaCl, the mean hydrodynamic radius (R(h)) of bPEI-HA increases from 2.0 +/- 1.1 to 366.0 +/- 149.0 nm. However, increasing the salt concentration decreases the mean R(h) of bPEI-HA/DNA complexes from 595.0 +/- 44.6 to 106.0 +/- 19.2 nm at 25 degrees C and from 767.0 +/- 137.2 to 74.0 +/- 23.0 nm at 37 degrees C. hMSCs transfected with smaller complexes showed a significant increase in transfection from 3.8 +/- 1.5% to 19.1 +/- 4.4%. Similarly, bPEI-HA performed significantly better than bPEI in terms of cell viability (86.0 +/- 6.7% with bPEI-HA versus 7.0 +/- 2.8% with bPEI, 24 h post exposure at the highest concentration of 500 mg/mL) and maximum transfection efficiencies (12.0 +/- 4.2% with bPEI/DNA complexes and 33.6 +/- 13.9% with bPEI-HA/DNA complexes). Thus, modifying bPEI by covalent conjugation with HA improves its performance as a gene delivery vector in hMSCs. This presents a promising approach to altering hMSCs for tissue engineering and other applications.     

Tomato transcriptional changes in response to Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis reveal a role for ethylene in disease development

Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) is a gram-positive actinomycete, causing bacterial wilt and canker disease in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Host responses to gram-positive bacteria and molecular mechanisms associated with the development of disease symptoms caused by Cmm in tomato are largely unexplored. To investigate plant responses activated during this compatible interaction, we used microarray analysis to monitor changes in host gene expression during disease development. This analysis was performed at 4 d postinoculation, when bacteria were actively multiplying and no wilt symptoms were yet visible; and at 8 d postinoculation, when bacterial growth approached saturation and typical wilt symptoms were observed. Of the 9,254 tomato genes represented on the array, 122 were differentially expressed in Cmm-infected plants, compared with mock-inoculated plants. Functional classification of Cmm-responsive genes revealed that Cmm activated typical basal defense responses in the host, including induction of defense-related genes, production and scavenging of free oxygen radicals, enhanced protein turnover, and hormone synthesis. Cmm infection also induced a subset of host genes involved in ethylene biosynthesis and response. After inoculation with Cmm, Never ripe (Nr) mutant plants, impaired in ethylene perception, and transgenic plants with reduced ethylene synthesis showed significant delay in the appearance of wilt symptoms, compared with wild-type plants. The retarded wilting in Nr plants was a specific effect of ethylene insensitivity, and was not due to altered expression of defense-related genes, reduced bacterial populations, or decreased ethylene synthesis. Taken together, our results indicate that host-derived ethylene plays an important role in regulation of the tomato susceptible response to Cmm.     

Activation and manipulation of host responses by a Gram-positive bacterium

The interaction between tomato plants and Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) represents a model pathosystem to study the interplay between the virulence determinants of a Gram-positive bacterium and the attempt of a crop plant to counteract pathogen invasion. To investigate plant responses activated during this compatible interaction, we recently analyzed gene expression profiles of tomato stems infected with Cmm. This analysis revealed activation of basal defense responses that are typically observed upon plant perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns. In addition, Cmm infection upregulated the expression of host genes related to ethylene synthesis and response. Further analysis of tomato plants impaired in ethylene perception and production demonstrated an important role for ethylene in the development of disease symptoms. Here we discuss possible molecular strategies used by the plant to recognize Cmm infection and possible mechanisms employed by the pathogen to interfere with the activation of plant defense responses and promote disease.Key words: tomato, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, ethylene, basal defense, pathogen-associated molecular patternsLittle is known on the strategies employed by Gram-positive phytopathogenic bacteria to sense the presence of the host plant, penetrate and colonize tissue, and counteract plant defense responses. Also largely unexplored are the molecular mechanisms associated with detection of Gram-positive bacteria by the host plant and with the activation of attempted defense responses.Among the most devastating Gram-positive disease agents are actinobacteria of the genus Clavibacter whose subspecies cause systemic infections of the xylem in different plant species.¹ The subspecies Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis (Cmm) causes bacterial wilt and canker of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), an economically important disease causing yield losses worldwide.¹ In recent years important insight into the molecular mechanism of Cmm pathogenicity has been achieved,¹ and genome sequence of a Cmm strain has been established.² Major Cmm pathogenicity determinants are plasmid borne and include the β-1,4-endocellulase CelA,³ and the putative serine protease Pat-1.⁴ Additional genes important for virulence are located in a pathogenicity island of about 129 kb on the Cmm chromosome which has a relatively low G + C content and is required for effective Cmm colonization of tomato plants.²Tomato is an economically important crop amenable to genetic analysis and transformations. Many resources are available for this plant species, including germplasm collections, natural and induced mutants, an extensive expressed sequence tag database and an ongoing genome sequencing project.⁵ In addition, because of its experimental tractability, tomato plants have been widely used to study plant disease resistance and susceptibility. As genetic and molecular tools for both Cmm and tomato are in place, the tomato-Cmm pathosystem represents an excellent model to study the interplay between virulence determinants of a Gram-positive phytopathogenic bacterium and defense responses of a crop plant.To get insight into host responses occurring during the tomato-Cmm compatible interaction and molecular mechanisms associated with the development of wilt and canker disease symptoms, we recently analyzed gene expression profiles of tomato stems infected with Cmm.⁶ This analysis revealed a clear activation of basal defense responses, which are typically observed upon plant perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs).⁷ These include production and scavenging of free oxygen radicals, induction of defense-related genes, enhanced protein turnover, and hormone biosynthesis. Interestingly, several tomato genes encoding proteins with characteristics of cell-surface receptors were differentially expressed in response to Cmm infection.⁶ These proteins can be considered as candidate receptors for Cmm PAMPs and include two receptor-like kinases, a homolog of the receptor for the fungal PAMP ethylene-inducing xylanase from Trichoderma viride,⁸ and the Ve1 resistance protein, which confers resistance in tomato to the vascular disease Verticillium wilt.⁹It remains to be elucidated what are the Cmm PAMPs perceived by tomato plants. Cold-shock protein from Gram-positive bacteria and different microbial patterns of Gram-negative bacteria, including lipopolysaccharides, flagellin, and the translational elongation factor EF-TU, were shown to act as PAMPs in plants.¹⁰ Similarly, Cmm cold shock protein or cell wall components, such as peptidoglycan, lipoteichoic acid, and lipopeptides, which function as Gram positive-derived PAMPs in animal systems¹¹, may act as PAMPs during the tomato-Cmm interaction. Additional possible Cmm PAMPs are exopolysaccharides, which are produced in large amounts by the bacterium and may interact directly with surface-exposed plant proteins.¹ The numerous extracellular cell wall degrading enzymes secreted by Cmm may also function as PAMPs, as observed for the fungal ethylene-inducing xylanase.^2,12 Alternatively, by virtue of their hydrolytic activity, these enzymes may release plant cell wall fragments that are recognized by PAMP receptors. Indeed, different β-glucan fragments released from plant cell walls were shown to elicit plant basal defense responses.^13,14How Cmm copes with the activation of basal defense responses is largely unknown. Many potential virulence determinants that might interfere with the plant defense reaction are clustered in the Cmm pathogenicity island, which is essential for effective plant colonization.² Several extracellular serine proteases are encoded in this region and inactivation of part of them by gene replacement drastically reduced Cmm colonization of tomato plants.² Although their targets are still unknown, these proteins might interfere with plant signaling pathways as it was described for certain cysteine proteases that serves in Gram-negative bacteria as suppressors of plant defenses.¹⁵ An additional candidate for interference with plant signaling may be a tomatinase, also encoded in the Cmm pathogenicity island, because hydrolysis products of α-tomatine were shown to suppress plant defense responses in a fungal system.¹⁶In addition to detecting the activation of basal defense responses, host gene expression profiling during the tomato-Cmm interaction unraveled the involvement of ethylene in disease development.⁶ In fact, Cmm infection of tomato stems was found to induce expression of host genes related to ethylene biosynthesis and response (Fig. 1).⁶ Further analysis of ethylene-insensitive Never ripe mutants and transgenic plants with reduced ethylene synthesis indicated that ethylene is required for normal development of wilting symptoms (Fig. 2), but not for the activation of defense-related genes or bacterial colonization.⁶ We hypothesize that during infection ethylene synthesis and response are manipulated by Cmm virulence determinants to promote disease. Alternatively, ethylene is released as part of the host responses activated by bacterial recognition, or as a result of tissue maceration. In line with our first hypothesis, the type III effectors AvrPto and AvrPtoB from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato were shown to promote enhanced disease symptoms in tomato leaves, in part, by upregulating genes involved in ethylene production.¹⁷ Interestingly, expression in tomato plants of AvrPto or AvrPtoB, and infection with Cmm resulted in the upregulation of the SlACO1 gene encoding the key enzyme of ethylene biosynthesis ACC oxidase.^6,17Open in a separate windowFigure 1Kinetics of ACC oxidase (ACO) gene expression in tomato plants inoculated with Cmm. Six-week-old tomato plants were infected with a Cmm suspension (10⁸ cfu/ml) or mock-inoculated. Total RNA was extracted from stem samples harvested at the indicated day post-inoculation (dpi) and subjected to Northern blot analysis using as probe a 550 bp fragment of the SlACO1 gene, which shares high homology with other ACO family members (upper). Ethidium bromide staining shows the amount of RNA loaded in each lane (lower).Open in a separate windowFigure 2Effect of impaired ethylene sensitivity on development of wilt symptoms in tomato plants infected with Cmm. Six-week-old plants were infected with a Cmm suspension (10⁸ cfu/ml) and examined for development of wilt symptoms during a 20-day period. The percentage of plants showing wilt symptoms was calculated in a group of at least 30 plants for the ethylene-insensitive mutant Never ripe and wild-type Pearson plants. Data are representative of two independent experiments.In conclusion, future research challenges for understanding how host responses are regulated by the plant and manipulated by a Gram-positive bacterium will be the isolation of Cmm PAMPs and their plant receptors, the identification of Cmm virulence determinants and the elucidation of their mode of action.     

Effect of gamma irradiation on the efficacy of β-glucan against acetaminophen induced toxicity in mice

The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of unirradiated β-glucan (UBG) and gamma irradiated β-glucan (GIBG) against acetaminophen (APAP) induced hepatotoxicity in mice. Mice of BALB/c strain were pretreated with UBG and GIBG (50 mg/kg, p.o.) for 7 days and on the 8th day they received an overdose of APAP (500 mg/kg, i.p.). Eight hours after the APAP injection, the levels of serum aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were measured and liver, kidney and lung tissue were examined for morphological changes. A significant elevation (p < 0.001) of the levels of AST and ALT was observed in mice toxicated with APAP. Histology data revealed severe liver centrilobular necrosis, portal vein damage with apparent toxicity in renal glomerulus and lung inflammation associated with edema. However, a significant inhibition (p < 0.05) in the elevation of AST and ALT was observed in mice that received UBG and GIBG compared with APAP-treated mice. Histology examination revealed the non-statistical difference between the protective effects of GIBG and UBG against acetaminophen challenge. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that gamma irradiation induced no severe alteration in the protective activity of β-glucan against APAP-induced hepatotoxicity.     

Structural and Enzymatic Characterization of Os3BGlu6, a Rice β-Glucosidase Hydrolyzing Hydrophobic Glycosides and (1→3)- and (1→2)-Linked Disaccharides

Glycoside hydrolase family 1 (GH1) β-glucosidases play roles in many processes in plants, such as chemical defense, alkaloid metabolism, hydrolysis of cell wall-derived oligosaccharides, phytohormone regulation, and lignification. However, the functions of most of the 34 GH1 gene products in rice (Oryza sativa) are unknown. Os3BGlu6, a rice β-glucosidase representing a previously uncharacterized phylogenetic cluster of GH1, was produced in recombinant Escherichia coli. Os3BGlu6 hydrolyzed p-nitrophenyl (pNP)-β-d-fucoside (k_cat/K_m = 67 mm⁻¹ s⁻¹), pNP-β-d-glucoside (k_cat/K_m = 6.2 mm⁻¹ s⁻¹), and pNP-β-d-galactoside (k_cat/K_m = 1.6 mm⁻¹s⁻¹) efficiently but had little activity toward other pNP glycosides. It also had high activity toward n-octyl-β-d-glucoside and β-(1→3)- and β-(1→2)-linked disaccharides and was able to hydrolyze apigenin β-glucoside and several other natural glycosides. Crystal structures of Os3BGlu6 and its complexes with a covalent intermediate, 2-deoxy-2-fluoroglucoside, and a nonhydrolyzable substrate analog, n-octyl-β-d-thioglucopyranoside, were solved at 1.83, 1.81, and 1.80 Å resolution, respectively. The position of the covalently trapped 2-F-glucosyl residue in the enzyme was similar to that in a 2-F-glucosyl intermediate complex of Os3BGlu7 (rice BGlu1). The side chain of methionine-251 in the mouth of the active site appeared to block the binding of extended β-(1→4)-linked oligosaccharides and interact with the hydrophobic aglycone of n-octyl-β-d-thioglucopyranoside. This correlates with the preference of Os3BGlu6 for short oligosaccharides and hydrophobic glycosides.β-Glucosidases (EC 3.2.1.21) have a wide range of functions in plants, including acting in cell wall remodeling, lignification, chemical defense, plant-microbe interactions, phytohormone activation, activation of metabolic intermediates, and release of volatiles from their glycosides (Esen, 1993). They fulfill these roles by hydrolyzing the glycosidic bond at the nonreducing terminal glucosyl residue of a glycoside or an oligosaccharide, thereby releasing Glc and an aglycone or a shortened carbohydrate. The aglycone released from the glycoside may be a monolignol, a toxic compound, or a compound that further reacts to release a toxic component, an active phytohormone, a reactive metabolic intermediate, or a volatile scent compound (Brzobohatý et al., 1993; Dharmawardhama et al., 1995; Reuveni et al., 1999; Lee et al., 2006; Barleben et al., 2007; Morant et al., 2008). Indeed, the wide range of glucosides of undocumented functions found in plants suggests that many β-glucosidase functions may remain to be discovered.Plant β-glucosidases fall into related families that have been classified as glycosyl hydrolase (GH) families GH1, GH3, and GH5 (Henrissat, 1991; Coutinho and Henrissat, 1998, 1999). Of these, GH1 has been most thoroughly documented and shown to comprise a gene family encoding 40 putative functional GHs in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and 34 in rice (Oryza sativa) in addition to a few pseudogenes (Xu et al., 2004; Opassiri et al., 2006). In addition to β-glucosidases, plant GH1 members include β-mannosidases (Mo and Bewley, 2002), β-thioglucosidases (Burmeister et al., 1997), and disaccharidases such as primeverosidase (Mizutani et al., 2002) as well as hydroxyisourate hydrolase, which hydrolyzes the internal bond in a purine ring rather than a glycosidic bond (Raychaudhuri and Tipton, 2002). The specificity for the glycone in GH1 enzymes varies. Some enzymes are quite specific for β-d-glucosides or β-d-mannosides, while many accept either β-d-glucosides or β-d-fucosides, and some also hydrolyze β-d-galactosides, β-d-xylosides, and α-l-arabinoside (Esen, 1993). However, most GH1 enzymes are thought to hydrolyze glucosides in the plant, and it is the aglycone specificity that determines the functions of most GH1 enzymes.Aglycone specificity of GH1 β-glucosidases ranges from rather broad to absolutely specific for one substrate and is not obvious from sequence similarity. For instance, maize (Zea mays) ZmGlu1 β-glucosidase hydrolyzes a range of glycosides, including its natural substrate, 2-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-4-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (DIMBOAGlc), but not dhurrin, whereas sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Dhr1, which is 72% identical to ZmGlu1, only hydrolyzes its natural cyanogenic substrate dhurrin (Verdoucq et al., 2003). Similarly, despite sharing over 80% amino acid sequence identity, the legume isoflavonoid β-glucosidases dalcochinase from Dalbergia cochinchinensis and Dnbglu2 from Dalbergia nigrescens hydrolyze each other''s natural substrate very poorly (Chuankhayan et al., 2007). Thus, small differences in the amino acid sequence surrounding the active site may be expected to account for significant differences in substrate specificity.GH1 is classified in GH clan A, which consists of GH families whose members have a (β/α)₈-barrel structure with the catalytic acid/base on strand 4 of the β-barrel and the catalytic nucleophile on strand 7 (Henrissat et al., 1995; Jenkins et al., 1995). As such, all GH1 enzymes have similar overall structures, but it has been noted that four variable loops at the C-terminal end of the β-barrel strands, designated A, B, C, and D, account for much of the differences in the active site architecture (Sanz-Aparicio et al., 1998). The similar structures with great diversity in substrate specificity make plant GH1 enzymes an ideal model system to investigate the structural basis of substrate specificity. To date, seven plant β-glucosidase structures have been reported, including three closely related chloroplastic enzymes from maize (Czjzek et al., 2000, 2001), sorghum (Verdoucq et al., 2004), and wheat (Triticum aestivum; Sue et al., 2006), the cytoplasmic strictosidine β-glucosidase from Rauvolfia serpentine (Barleben et al., 2007), and the secreted enzymes white clover (Trifolium repens) cyanogenic β-glucosidase (Barrett et al., 1995), white mustard (Sinapsis alba) myrosinase (thioglucosidase; Burmeister et al., 1997), and rice Os3BGlu7 (BGlu1; Chuenchor et al., 2008). These enzymes hydrolyze substrates with a range of structures, but they cannot account for the full range of β-glucosidase substrates available in plants, and determining the structural differences that bring about substrate specificity differences in even closely related GH1 enzymes has proven tricky (Verdoucq et al., 2003, 2004; Sue et al., 2006; Chuenchor et al., 2008).Amino acid sequence-based phylogenetic analysis of GH1 enzymes encoded by the rice genome showed that there are eight clusters containing both rice and Arabidopsis proteins that are more closely related to each other than they are to enzymes from the same plants outside the clusters (Fig. 1; Opassiri et al., 2006). In addition, there are a cluster of sixteen putative β-glucosidases and a cluster of myrosinases in Arabidopsis without any closely related rice counterparts. Comparison with characterized GH1 enzymes from other plants reveals other clusters of related enzymes not found in rice or Arabidopsis, including the chloroplastic enzymes, from which the maize, sorghum, and wheat structures are derived, and the cytoplasmic metabolic enzymes, from with the strictosidine hydrolase structure is derived (Fig. 1). Therefore, although the known structures provide good tools for molecular modeling of plant enzymes, most rice and Arabidopsis GH1 enzymes lack a close correspondence in sequence and functional evolution to these structures, suggesting that the variable loops that determine the active site may be different. It would be useful, therefore, to know the structures and substrate specificities of representative members of each of the eight clusters seen in rice and Arabidopsis. To begin to acquire this information, we have expressed Os3BGlu6, a member of cluster At/Os 1 in Figure 1, characterized its substrate specificity, and determined its structure alone and in complex with a glycosyl intermediate and a nonhydrolyzable substrate analog.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Simplified phylogenetic tree of the amino acid sequences of eukaryotic GH1 proteins with known structures and those of rice and Arabidopsis GH1 gene products. The protein sequences of the eukaryotic proteins with known structures are marked with four-character PDB codes for one of their structures, including Trifolium repens cyanogenic β-glucosidase (1CBG; Barrett et al., 1995), Sinapsis alba myrosinase (1MYR; Burmeister et al., 1997), Zea mays ZmGlu1 β-glucosidase (1E1F; Czjzek et al., 2000), Sorghum bicolor Dhr1 dhurrinase (1V02; Verdoucq et al., 2004), Triticum aestivum β-glucosidase (2DGA; Sue et al., 2006), Rauvolfia serpentina strictosidine β-glucosidase (2JF6; Barleben et al., 2007), and Oryza sativa Os3BGlu7 (BGlu1) β-glucosidase (2RGL; Chuenchor et al., 2008) from plants, along with Brevicoryne brassicae myrosinase (1WCG; Husebye et al., 2005), Homo sapiens cytoplasmic (Klotho) β-glucosidase (2E9M; Hayashi et al., 2007), and Phanerochaete chrysosporium (2E3Z; Nijikken et al., 2007), while those encoded in the Arabidopsis and rice genomes are labeled with the systematic names given by Xu et al. (2004) and Opassiri et al. (2006), respectively. One or two example proteins from each plant are given for each of the eight clusters of genes shared by Arabidopsis (At) and rice (Os) and the Arabidopsis-specific clusters At I (β-glucosidases) and At II (myrosinases), with the number of Arabidopsis or rice enzymes in each cluster given in parentheses. These sequences were aligned with all of the Arabidopsis and rice sequences in ClustalX (Thompson et al., 1997), the alignment was manually edited, all but representative sequences were removed, and the tree was calculated by the neighbor-joining method, bootstrapped with 1,000 trials, and then drawn with TreeView (Page, 1996). The grass plastid β-glucosidases, which are not represented in Arabidopsis and rice, are shown in the group marked “Plastid.” Percentage bootstrap reproducibility values are shown on internal branches where they are greater than 60%. Except those marked by asterisks, all external branches represent groups with 100% bootstrap reproducibility. To avoid excess complexity, those groups of sequences marked with asterisks are not monophyletic and represent more branches within the designated cluster than are shown. For a complete phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis and rice GH1 proteins, see Opassiri et al. (2006).     

Impact of rRNA methylations on ribosome recycling and fidelity of initiation in Escherichia coli

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) contains a number of modified nucleosides in functionally important regions including the intersubunit bridge regions. As the activity of ribosome recycling factor (RRF) in separating the large and the small subunits of the ribosome involves disruption of intersubunit bridges, we investigated the impact of rRNA methylations on ribosome recycling. We show that deficiency of rRNA methylations, especially at positions 1518 and 1519 of 16S rRNA near the interface with the 50S subunit and in the vicinity of the IF3 binding site, adversely affects the efficiency of RRF-mediated ribosome recycling. In addition, we show that a compromise in the RRF activity affords increased initiation with a mutant tRNA^fMet wherein the three consecutive G-C base pairs (₂₉GGG₃₁:₃₉CCC₄₁), a highly conserved feature of the initiator tRNAs, were mutated to those found in the elongator tRNA^Met (₂₉UCA₃₁:₃₉ψGA₄₁). This observation has allowed us to uncover a new role of RRF as a factor that contributes to fidelity of initiator tRNA selection on the ribosome. We discuss these and earlier findings to propose that RRF plays a crucial role during all the steps of protein synthesis.