Dynamical Systems Approach to Higher-level Heritability

To explain higher-level heritability, we propose a dynamical systems approach, based on simulations of the high-dimensional replicator equation with mutation dynamics. We assume that all variants are generated from within the groups of variants through mutations. Simulating the equation with a random interaction matrix and possible variants, we report that this system tends to have many attractors, of fixed point, chaotic and quasiperiodic type. In a chaotic attractor, special gene-like variants appear to control the heritability ofthe system, in the sense that removal of the variants would easily enable the system to depart from the attractor. Those variants do not predominate in thepopulation size, but have the lowest net reproduction and mutation rates on average. Because their rate of growth is small, they are named neutral phenotypes. Additionally, combinatorial effects of these neutral variants to the entire system are reported.     

Design,synthesis, characterization,antibacterial and antifungal activities of a novel class of 5,7-diaryl-4,4-dimethyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydropyridino[3,4-d]-1,2,3-selenadiazoles

Compound 26 is more potent against Escherichia coli. and 24 is more active against Staphylococcus aureus, β-Heamolytic streptococcus, Vibreo cholerae, Salmonella typhii, and Shigella flexneri than the standard drug ciprofloxacin. Moreover, of all the compounds tested, 26 is more effective against Aspergillus flavus and Mucor, than the standard drug fluconazole.     

Evolution of green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): a molecular supermatrix approach

We present a time‐calibrated phylogeny of the charismatic green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Previous phylogenetic studies on the family using DNA sequences have suffered from sparse taxon sampling and/or limited amounts of data. Here we combine all available previously published DNA sequence data and add to it new DNA sequences generated for this study. We analysed these data in a supermatrix using Bayesian and maximum likelihood methods and provide a phylogenetic hypothesis for the family that recovers strong support for the monophyly of all subfamilies and resolves relationships among a large proportion of chrysopine genera. Chrysopinae tribes Leucochrysini and Belonopterygini were recovered as monophyletic sister clades, while the species‐rich tribe Chrysopini was rendered paraphyletic by Ankylopterygini. Relationships among the subfamilies were resolved, although with relatively low statistical support, and the topology varied based on the method of analysis. Greatest support was found for Apochrysinae as sister to Nothochrysinae and Chrysopinae, which is in contrast to traditional concepts that place Nothochrysinae as sister to the rest of the family. Divergence estimates suggest that the stem groups to the various subfamilies diverged during the Triassic‐Jurassic, and that stem groups of the chrysopine tribes diverged during the Cretaceous.     

Exclosure fences around nests of imperiled Florida Grasshopper Sparrows reduce rates of predation by mammals

Increasing nest survival by excluding predators is a goal of many bird conservation programs. However, new exclosure projects should be carefully evaluated to assess the potential risks of disturbance. We tested the effectiveness of predator exclosure fences (hereafter, fences) for nests of critically endangered Florida Grasshopper Sparrows (Ammodramus savannarum floridanus) at a dry prairie site (Three Lakes; 2015–2018) and a pasture site (the Ranch; 2015–2016) in Osceola County, Florida, USA. We installed fences at nests an average of 8 days after the start of incubation, and nest abandonment after fence installation was rare (2 of 149 installations). Predation was the leading cause of failure for unfenced nests at both sites (48–73%). At Three Lakes, nest cameras revealed that mammals and snakes were responsible for 61.5% and 38.5% of predation events, respectively, at unfenced nests. Fences reduced the daily probability of predation (0.016 for fenced nests vs. 0.074 for unfenced nests). The probability that a fenced nest would survive from discovery to fledging was more than double that of unfenced nests (60.4% vs. 27.7%). However, we found no difference in daily nest survival at the Ranch between the year before nests were fenced (2015; 0.874) and the year when all but one nest were fenced (2016; 0.867) because red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) were responsible for 86% of predation events at fenced nests at the Ranch. The use of cameras at fenced nests revealed that site‐specific differences in nest predators explained variation in fence efficiency between sites. Our fence design may be useful for other species of grassland birds, but site‐specific predator communities and species‐specific response of target bird species to fences should be assessed before installing fences at other sites.     

Somatostatin-detergent interaction

The effect of cationic, anionic and nonionic detergents on the EPR spectrum of spin-labeled somatostatin has been studied. At detergent concentrations well above the critical micelle concentration, nonionic detergents do not alter the EPR spectrum. Sodium dodecyl sulfate markedly alters both the line height ratio and the hyperfine splitting constant, whilst dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide alters only slightly the hyperfine splitting constant and line height ratio. The somatostatin-sodium dodecyl sulfate complex appeared monodisperse by sedimentation equilibrium with about 17 g bound detergent per g peptide. Circular dichroic and difference spectra of the dodecyl sulfate-somatostatin complex show that the tryptophanyl residue is buried in a nonpolar environment and that the secondary and tertiary structure of the peptide is markedly altered. Sedimentation equilibrium studies suggest that two types of dodecyltrimethylammonium-somatostatin complex exist. One type resembles the dodecyl sulfate-peptide complex, whilst the other appears to include several peptide units with only about one gram bound detergent per gram peptide.