Recovery action for threatened species–an Australian perspective

The history, scope and nature of threats facing endangered and vulnerable species in Australia are reviewed. The Australian Endangered Species Programme was established in July 1989 to address these problems. The planned approach adopted by this programme, including action plans, recovery plans, amelioration of threatening processes and education and public awareness campaigns, is described and explained. Example recovery actions for two threatened Australian birds (Orange-bellied Parrot Neophema chrysogaster and Noisy Scrub-bird Atrichornis clamosis ) are outlined.     

Paraphyly of Homoptera and Auchenorrhyncha inferred from 18S rDNA nucleotide sequences

Evolutionary affiliations of eighteen families of Hemiptera (s.l.) are inferred using molecular phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide (nt) sequences of 18S rDNAs. Exemplar taxa include: Archaeorrhyncha (=Fulgoromorpha): flatid, issid, dictyopharid, cixiid and delphacid; Prosorrhyncha (=Heteropterodea): Peloridiomorpha (=Coleorhyncha) -peloridiid, Heteroptera gerrid, lygaeid and mirid; Clypeorrhyncha [=extant (monophyletic) cicadomorphs]: cicadid, cercopoids (cercopid, aphrophorid), membracid and cicadellids (deltocephaline and cicadelline); and Sternorrhyncha: psyllid, aleyrodid, diaspidid and aphid. Analysed sequences encompass a region beginning ?550 nucleotides (nts) from the 5'-end to ?200 nts upstream from the 3'-end of the gene [?1150 base pairs (bp) in euhemipteran to >1400 bp in sternorrhynchan taxa]. Maximum parsimony and bootstrap analyses (PAUP) identify four principal hemipteran clades, Stenorrhyncha, Clypeorrhyncha, Archaeorrhyncha and Prosorrhyncha. These lineages are identified by synapomorphies distributed throughout the gene. Sternorrhyncha is a sister group to all other Hemiptera (i.e. Euhemiptera sensu Zrzavy), rendering Homoptera paraphyletic. Within Euhemiptera, clades Clypeorrhyncha, Archaeorrhyncha, Prosorrhyncha and Heteroptera are supported by one, three, two and three synapomorphic sites, respectively. There is equitable parsimonious inference for Archaeorrhyncha as the sister group to Prosorrhyncha (Neoherriiptera sensu Sorensen et al.) or Clypeorrhyncha, in either case rendering Auchenorrhyncha paraphyletic. Neohemiptera is supported by one synapomorphy. Within Clypeorrhyncha, clade cicada + cercopoids is the sister group of the clade cicadellids + membracid (Membracoidea sensu Dietrich & Deitz). Among archaeorrhynchans, clade delphacid + cixiid is the sister group of the clade dictyopharid + flatid + issid. Within Prosorrhyncha, the peloridiid is sister to the Heteroptera. Within Heteroptera, gerrid is the sister group of the clade mirid + lygaeid (Panheteroptera sensu Schuh). Based on secondary structure of synonymous 18S rRNA, two synapomorphies each of Sternorrhyncha, Prosorrhyncha and Heteroptera are compensatory substitutions on stem substructures. All other synapomorphies identifying major lineages of Hemiptera are noncompensatory substitutions on either bulges or stems. Short basal internodal distances suggest radiation of hemipteran lineages at the suborder level occurred rapidly. Morphological, palaeoentomological and eco-evolutionary factors supporting the 18S rDNA-based phylogenetic tree are discussed.     

Benthic macroinvertebrate community structure, function and production with respect to habitat type, reach and drainage basin in the southern Appalachians (U.S.A.)

1. Benthic macroinvertebrates were sampled for 1 year to assess functional and taxonomic differences in invertebrate biomass and production with respect to habitat types, reaches and catchments in Wine Spring Basin, western North Carolina. Quantitative samples were collected from depositional, cobble-riffle and bedrock outcrop habitats at four stream reaches (two headwater sites, one second order, and one third order). Other measures included physical parameters, periphyton and organic matter standing crops. Invertebrate data from the Wine Spring catchment were also compared with data from another catchment (Ball Creek) within the same region. 2. The three habitat types had different current velocities and mean substratum particle sizes; both measures were greatest in bedrock outcrop habitats and lowest in depositional habitats. Organic matter standing crops, invertebrate functional group productivity and biomass also differed significantly with respect to habitat type. Cobble-riffle areas had the lowest standing crops of organic matter, invertebrate productivity and biomass. 3. Both invertebrate communities and organic matter standing crops differed significantly between the two headwater reaches. First- to third-order reaches differed in taxonomic composition at the genus level, yet had similar relative functional group productivity and biomass. 4. Annual mean invertebrate biomass and secondary production were greater in the Wine Spring Basin than in Ball Creek. Sites in both the Wine Spring and Ball Creek catchments, however, exhibited similar functional group distributions per habitat type. 5. Local geomorphology and related physical parameters influenced the structure of invertebrate functional group composition, and the distribution of organic matter standing crops. Furthermore, comparison of community structure in Wine Spring with that in Ball Creek suggested that taxonomic composition was more related to catchment-specific parameters (e.g. thermal regime, evolutionary history) than stream size.     

Phylogenetic relationships within the turacos (Musophagidae)

Cytochrome b sequences were used to investigate both the systematic position of the Musophagidae and the species relationships within the family. Phylogenetic analyses (neighbour-joining, maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony) supported the hypothesis that the Musophagidae are more closely related to the cuckoos, parrots and the Hoatzin than the gamebirds. Within the family, three major clades are evident that correspond to the three subfamilies generally recognized. The 'grey turacos' and the turacin-bearing turacos form two separate monophyletic groups. Corythaixoides leucogaster appears to be basal within the subfamily Criniferinae (the 'grey turacos'). This analysis yields a hypothesis for the controversy surrounding the position of Gallirex porphyreolophus and Tauraco johnstoni, which appear to be closely related and basal to the other turacin-bearing turacos. The Musophaga species are placed within the Tauraco clade and appear to be specialized forms of typical turacos. The superspecies persa forms a monophyletic group, within which T. hartlaubi falls. This is an association that has not been suggested previously.     

The phylogeny of the Rhinocerotoidea (Mammalia, Perissodactyla)

A new phylogeny of the Superfamily Rhinocerotoidea is proposed, based upon an analysis of shared derived characters of the skull, teeth and skeleton. Hyrachyus is considered the primitive sister-taxon of the three rhinocerotoid families (Amynodontidae, Hyracodontidae, Rhinocerotidae), and the amynodonts appear to be the sister-group of hyracodonts and rhinocerotids. The relationships of primitive hyracodonts and rhinocerotids are clarified. Menoceras and Pleuroceras (new Subfamily Menoceratinae) are removed from the Diceratheriinae, since they appear to be more closely related to higher rhinoceroses than they are to Diceratherium. Of the three major monophyletic groups of higher rhinocerotids (aceratherines, teleoceratines and rhinocerotines), the last two groups are more closely related to each other than either is to aceratherines. Toxotherium and Schizotheroides are tentatively removed from the Rhinocerotoidea and placed in the Lophiodontidae.     

Mutant tRNA<Superscript>His</Superscript> Ineffective in Repression and Lacking Two Pseudouridine Modifications

TRANSFER RNA has been implicated in the regulation of a number of amino-acid biosynthetic operons^1–4. Histidyl-tRNA^His has been shown to be involved in regulation of the histidine operon by analysis of six genes (hisO, hisR, hisS, hisT, hisU, hisW), mutation of which causes derepression of the enzymes of the histidine biosynthetic pathway in Salmonella typhimurium^5–7. A class of derepressed mutants (hisR) has only about 55% as much tRNA^His as the wild type⁴ and in the one example sequenced, contains tRNA^HIS with a structure identical to that of the wild type⁸. Studies of mutants of the gene for histidyl-tRNA synthetase (hisS) indicated that the derepressed phenotype was associated with defects in the charging of tRNA^HISin vitro². The amounts of charged and uncharged tRNA^His present in vivo during physiological derepression of the wild type and in the six classes of regulatory mutants, have been determined⁹. This work has shown that repression of the histidine operon is correlated directly with the concentration of charged histidyl-tRNA^Hisin vivo and not with the ratio of charged to uncharged or the absolute amount of uncharged tRNA^His. The derepression observed in mutants, of hisS (the gene for histidyl-tRNA synthetase), hisR (the presumed structural gene for the single species of tRNA^His) and hisU and hisW (genes presumably involved in tRNA modification) may be explained by the lower cellular concentration of charged tRNA^His which these mutants contain.     

The Function(s) of Bird Song

Male bird song may attract and stimulate females and may repelmales, but the evidence that song is essential for accomplishingthese "main functions" is not abundant. Correlations betweenmale song traits (such as repertoire size or singing rate) andcomponents of fitness reveal that important information, perhapsabout overall male quality, is available for listeners. To determinewhether birds use that information, however, will require researchersto manipulate song traits independently of male quality. Havingthen determined more rigorously the "current utility" of song,we will more clearly be able to infer how selection has shapedparticular song traits. We envision progress in understandingthe function(s) of bird song if investigators 1) thoroughlydescribe natural events, 2) use lucidly stated, multiple workinghypotheses, 3) realize the potential differences in song functionamong divergent taxonomic units, 4) transcend correlationalstudies by doing ingenious manipulative experiments, and 5)reason carefully when developing scenarios of evolutionary origin.