Mediator subunits MED1 and MED24 cooperatively contribute to pubertal mammary gland development and growth of breast carcinoma cells

The Mediator subunit MED1 is essential for mammary gland development and lactation, whose contribution through direct interaction with estrogen receptors (ERs) is restricted to involvement in pubertal mammary gland development and luminal cell differentiation. Here, we provide evidence that the MED24-containing submodule of Mediator functionally communicates specifically with MED1 in pubertal mammary gland development. Mammary glands from MED1/MED24 double heterozygous knockout mice showed profound retardation in ductal branching during puberty, while single haploinsufficient glands developed normally. DNA synthesis of both luminal and basal cells were impaired in double mutant mice, and the expression of ER-targeted genes encoding E2F1 and cyclin D1, which promote progression through the G(1)/S phase of the cell cycle, was attenuated. Luciferase reporter assays employing double mutant mouse embryonic fibroblasts showed selective impairment in ER functions. Various breast carcinoma cell lines expressed abundant amounts of MED1, MED24, and MED30, and attenuated expression of MED1 and MED24 in breast carcinoma cells led to attenuated DNA synthesis and growth. These results indicate functional communications between the MED1 subunit and the MED24-containing submodule that mediate estrogen receptor functions and growth of both normal mammary epithelial cells and breast carcinoma cells.     

The RAC binding domain/IRSp53-MIM homology domain of IRSp53 induces RAC-dependent membrane deformation

The concave surface of the crescent-shaped Bin-amphiphysin-Rvs (BAR) domain is postulated to bind to the cell membrane to induce membrane deformation of a specific curvature. The Rac binding (RCB) domain/IRSp53-MIM homology domain (IMD) has a dimeric structure that is similar to the structure of the BAR domain; however, the RCB domain/IMD has a "zeppelin-shaped" dimer. Interestingly, the RCB domain/IMD of IRSp53 possesses Rac binding, membrane binding, and actin filament binding abilities. Here we report that the RCB domain/IMD of IRSp53 induces membrane deformation independent of the actin filaments in a Rac-dependent manner. In contrast to the BAR domain, the RCB domain/IMD did not cause long tubulation of the artificial liposomes; however, the Rac binding domain caused the formation of small buds on the liposomal surface. When expressed in cells, the Rac binding domain induced outward protrusion of the plasma membrane in a direction opposite to that induced by the BAR domain. Mapping of the amino acids responsible for membrane deformation suggests that the convex surface of the Rac binding domain binds to the membrane in a Rac-dependent manner, which may explain the mechanism of the membrane deformation induced by the RCB domain/IMD.     

Structural basis for specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by NZF domains of TAB2 and TAB3

TAB2 and TAB3 activate the Jun N‐terminal kinase and nuclear factor‐κB pathways through the specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by its Npl4 zinc‐finger (NZF) domain. Here we report crystal structures of the TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains in complex with Lys 63‐linked diubiquitin at 1.18 and 1.40 Å resolutions, respectively. Both NZF domains bind to the distal ubiquitin through a conserved Thr‐Phe dipeptide that has been shown to be important for the interaction of the NZF domain of Npl4 with monoubiquitin. In contrast, a surface specific to TAB2 and TAB3 binds the proximal ubiquitin. Both the distal and proximal binding sites of the TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains recognize the Ile 44‐centred hydrophobic patch on ubiquitin but do not interact with the Lys 63‐linked isopeptide bond. Mutagenesis experiments show that both binding sites are required to enable binding of Lys 63‐linked diubiquitin. We therefore propose a mechanism for the recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains in which diubiquitin units are specifically recognized by a single NZF domain.     

Triploid bridge and role of parthenogenesis in the evolution of autopolyploidy

Autopolyploidization is considered to play an important role in plant evolution. In polyploidization, the polyploid evolves from the original diploid cytotype, in which the triploid state is considered to mediate the process (triploid bridge). Nevertheless, the fitness of triploid individuals seems to be too low to facilitate the polyploidization process (triploid block). The evolutionary condition of autopolyploidy was analyzed using a mathematical model focusing on the role of parthenogenesis in triploid and tetraploid individuals. In addition, offspring were assumed to arise by sexual reproduction by conjugations between haploid, diploid, and triploid gametes produced by diploid, tetraploid, and triploid individuals. According to the analysis, even if triploid block suppresses the fitness of sexually produced triploids, the polyploidization process can proceed when parthenogenesis occurs frequently. If only triploids frequently reproduce parthenogenetically, the evolutionary consequences tend to depend on the fitness of the tetraploid individuals. On the basis of a predetermined parameter set, if tetraploid fitness is relatively low, all three ploidies can coexist. Otherwise, tetraploidization occurs. In this case, triploid parthenogenesis promotes not only triploidization but also tetraploidization. However, if both triploids and tetraploids frequently reproduce parthenogenetically, the ploidy levels with the highest fitness are likely to dominate in the population through direct competition among cytotypes.